Hmmmmmm, it looks as I expected in regards to Jaime. They're making it easy for the audience to accept Brienne possibly cutting him down.
It's disappointing that they aren't giving us a more conflicted Jaime.
I don't think both of them will wish the season alive anyway.
Cersei, Jaimie, and Tommen die this season.
Book it.
Tommen - I agree.
Cersei - No, simply because Tommen is dying. Cersei has been such a despicable character that Cersei needs to outlive him by at least a few episodes (more than those that are left in this season) to feel the pain of having lost all of her children (in accordance with the prophecy...though I don't think that is part of the show), and accept that she probably caused it (at least with two of them), in the name of preserving her own power while using her children as a justification for her evil powergrabbing ways. In other words, Cersei, more than any other villain on the show, needs to see and feel the impact of what she has done. Plus there is unfinished business with Tyrion, who should be present for her death (if not outright kill her) to make it have its full emotional impact on the viewer.
Jamie - Could go either way. The only way he dies this season is if Brienne kills him...and it would be fitting for him to die at the hands of Brienne, impaled on a blade called Oathkeeper, that he gave her. Plus it would further isolate Cersei, taking away the one person she loves other than her children. In addition, it seems like Martin was setting up conflict between Brienne and Jamie through Lady Stoneheart. Its curious that in the absence of Stoneheart, Brienne has been inserted into the Blackfish/Riverrun siege story. This creates conflict with Jamie. Its almost as if despite Stoneheart being cut, the writers, who have some access to what Martin is planning in the next book, NEEDED to find a way to put Brienne in conflict with Jamie. Why do so if she isn't going to kill him. Flip side of that is that Jamie could kill her. Its not evidence of Jamie's death. Just evidence that these two characters need to be in conflict for some reason.
The argument against Jamie dying is that his story is not really set up for it (in context of the show) and I am not sure that they can give Jamie an appropriate swan song (that his character necessitates) with the way that the table has been set for the third act of the season. A conflict between he and Brienne over the siege of Riverrun does not really fit the kind of death that is warranted for Jamie's character. Plus, he also has unresolved business with Tyrion.
Personally, I do not think death is an appropriate end for Jamie. I think Jamie should survive the series (both TV and book) as the only surviving Lannister (well, one of two...maybe Tyrion lives) and take the Black (possibly becoming the new Lord Commander of the Night's Watch) as an act of atonement for his sins (for which he has some degree of guilt). It effectively ends the Lannister name, it is a satisfying conclusion for Jamie, and it is thematically fitting that the Oathbreaker atone for his sins by voluntarily taking a lifetime oath of service, not for glory, but to protect the realm.
You think the Night's Watch and the Wall is going to survive this series? Interesting... considering that A Song of Ice and Fire is very much structured as the conclusion of the ancient mythical conflict with the Others, with the Prince who was Promised and the return of dragons and all that jazz.
You don't think the High Sparrow would have Tommen named as the Faith's Champion and thrown to the Mountain, do you?
Oh yes please give us a Tommen/Mountain trial by combat. I need to see that little dolt die a brutal death.
Oh man, that would be evil...even by this show's incredibly high standard.
I don't think the High Sparrow would do that (because it doesn't do much to further his goals)...although, why is he so interested in Tommen having an heir? Unless he is planning to outlive Tommen.
Fist, that's what I'm predicting will happen too: Sandor will go get his revenge against the Brotherhood. A sparrow out in the Riverlands will notice or hear word of the warrior that ended the Brotherhood's worship of the Lord of Light, and end up escorting Sandor to King's Landing as a potential commander for the Faith Militant.
He'd have to have some pretty heavy malice toward Cersei for that.
I think the HS wants another political hostage. I guarantee the moment Margaery bore a son, the boy'd be taken from his parents to be raised "in the light of the Seven."
Fist, that's what I'm predicting will happen too: Sandor will go get his revenge against the Brotherhood. A sparrow out in the Riverlands will notice or hear word of the warrior that ended the Brotherhood's worship of the Lord of Light, and end up escorting Sandor to King's Landing as a potential commander for the Faith Militant.
It would also give Sandor the chance to turn the faith more toward Septon Ray's teachings.
I don't like that one. I read a theory that the Waif is a figment of Arya's imagination. A manifestation of the Faceless side of her personality. This was supported by the fact that you never see Jaqen addressing the Waif while Arya's in the room. And vice-versa.
I don't buy this weird theory that Arya gave some random street girl her own face. I mean, WTF? How would you convince someone to do that? "Hey! You! Yes, you! You're about my height and build. Listen, a secret group of assassins is planning to kill me. Would you mind walking around with my face for a few days? I'll make sure you get paid afterward if you prove successful. Deal?"
Fist, that's what I'm predicting will happen too: Sandor will go get his revenge against the Brotherhood. A sparrow out in the Riverlands will notice or hear word of the warrior that ended the Brotherhood's worship of the Lord of Light, and end up escorting Sandor to King's Landing as a potential commander for the Faith Militant.