I was not impressed by the FX in Revolutions at all and they didn't save that poor ass movie.
To me FX have to work in conjunction with the movie, and even if it has the best FX, if the movie sucks it doesn't deserve a nod.
Well, the visual effects did'nt save PoTc 3 from being a crappy movie now did it...Nor Spiderman 3..
I will agree visual effects are'nt just about the special effects or CGI used. Its how it was used,was it needed,does it flow with the movie. Does it make the movie worse or better.
300: It was visually entertaining. The cut scenes,the scenery,the coloring of the film was very good. Though I think the 'matrix' style effects will hurt it for this voting..
PoTC3: Though I disliked this movie,the visual effects were very solid. The sceneries were very well done,the CGI stuff looked like it belonged,everything blended in with its surroundings..
Bourne Ultimatum: Though this movie did'nt have the CGI like the others it was still visually good. This movie proves u don't have to throw in CGI robots,or matrix illusions to make a visually good movie..
Transformers: Not sure what to say? IMO this movie was way overrated in every department. However for this award its all about visuals. They were well done overall. I will give the CGI props on the auto/deceptacons,but overall visually the movie was'nt on par as I think it could of been..I don't think visually it was appealling or worthy of winning. However; I dont get a vote,but I will assume this one will win?
Evan Almighty: Not sure how this got thrown in the mix? Not even gonna comment on this...
*Spiderman3,not sure how this got left off,but I don't think it would of win anyways.
I am Legend: This ones hard to say. Visually it looked solid,but I don't think enough to win the award. The whole deserted city was very good,though complaints on the Dark Seekers came to forfront.
Who will win: Transformers
Who should win: 300
*Runner up: Bourne Ultimatum(showed ppl you don't need a ****load of CGI to be visually good movie)