The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Shailene Woodley COULD BE Mary Jane Watson.....in TASM3 - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
I try not to get involved on this topic... but, can you honestly say this is a good picture of the girl?

People are still posting this nonsense like it means something?

Oh, look, it's Andrew Garfield. Surely this picture wasn't taken at an awkward moment, he's just "ugly".

The stupidity of fanboys on the internet will never cease to amaze me.

andrew-garfield-funny-faces.jpg


emma-stone-andrew-garfield-funny-faces-at-photogs-17.jpg



shailene-woodley-crash-cafe-spiderman-05.jpg


shailene-woodley-crash-cafe-spiderman-09.jpg


shailene-woodley-spider-man-2-waitress-01.jpg


She looks absolutely fine as MJ. Perfect even.


:up::up::up:
 
I want shailene woodley as M.J. Have you guys seen that new beautiful manip of her and Peter?
 
Really? Why is this discussion back to a debate about Shailene's physical attractiveness? She's clearly a very good looking young woman. Trying to argue otherwise is not only hurtful and insulting to the actress, but also makes any mention or discussion involving 616 MJ a living nightmare on these forums. C'mon guys we were finally starting to move past this.:csad:
 
People are still posting this nonsense like it means something?

Oh, look, it's Andrew Garfield. Surely this picture wasn't taken at an awkward moment, he's just "ugly".

The stupidity of fanboys on the internet will never cease to amaze me.

andrew-garfield-funny-faces.jpg


emma-stone-andrew-garfield-funny-faces-at-photogs-17.jpg

but peter's beauty is not essential to his character, mj's is!!!11111

like i said in the last page, next month marks a year of shailene's casting. insane that the argument is literally exactly the same.
 
Bearded Spider-Man? That'd be tough with the mask on.
 
There's something about the Ultimate Spider-Man's MJ's eyebrows that just look wrong.
 
but peter's beauty is not essential to his character, mj's is!!!11111

YES YES YES. Peter needs to be a nerd (which is why im glad they made the Garfield version sooooo nerdy and ugly), so that MJ is a hott model and when she says the icnic jackpot line, we can see teh contrast...somehting something 616 version something...

like i said in the last page, next month marks a year of shailene's casting. insane that the argument is literally exactly the same.

Insane isn't the word I would use. 'Pathetic' is more appropriate.

Insane, pathetic, delusional...all appropriate.
 
she is average looking.

If Shailene is 'average looking' to you, your beauty standards are skewed way out of proportion, because she's a very beautiful young woman. She's just not a 'supermodel', which is what 'the unwashed masses' of fans apparently wanted.
 
I honestly think they could not have gotten a better young actress than Shailene. They hit the jackpot. She is absolutely amazing in The Spectacular Now, and seeing her in the next movie is the most exciting news about the films I've heard since Garfield's casting as Peter Parker.
 
People are still posting this nonsense like it means something?...
no.. no I didn't post it as if it meant something (at least not in regard to her looks) did you even read the post or just see the pic :huh:

was just commenting on that posters refusal to ever acknowledge that it was in fact a bad shot of her... not that it meant that she isn't good looking
 
Last edited:
no.. no I didn't post it as if it meant something (at least not in regard to her looks) did you even read the post or just see the pic :huh:

was just commenting on that posters refusal to ever acknowledge that it was in fact a bad shot of her... not that it meant that she isn't good looking

You wrote: "Can you honestly say this is a good picture?"

To what end? What is this highlighting of this "bad shot" meant to prove? What is the "bad shot" of Andrew Garfield meant to prove? Answer: That anyone can have their photo taken at an awkward moment or poor angle that comes out looking less than stellar.

It seems your intentions in posting that picture weren't clearly communicated... If I post a picture of an "ugly" shot of Andrew Garfield apropo of nothing with a caption saying "Can you honestly say this is a good picture?", it's going to be interpreted in a certain way. Context always helps.
 
^ He was responding directly to me and a statement I'd made rejecting the notion that the picture in question was bad, asking me if I was serious in claiming that the picture in question wasn't bad.
 
^ He was responding directly to me and a statement I'd made rejecting the notion that the picture in question was bad, asking me if I was serious in claiming that the picture in question wasn't bad.

My bad!

(This whole picture posting thing is still silly though)
 
If Shailene is 'average looking' to you, your beauty standards are skewed way out of proportion, because she's a very beautiful young woman. She's just not a 'supermodel', which is what 'the unwashed masses' of fans apparently wanted.

my beauty standards are different, that's all. I find most supermodels to be average looking too, not to mention unhealthy looking, so it's not a case of Shailene falling short of looking like a supermodel
 
she looks like a kind a girl i like when I drink 5 beers, but when i get sober in morning i regret it. thats my standards.
if that's MJ, i am ok with casting
 
Last edited:
she looks like a kind a girl i like when I drink 5 beers, but when i get sober in morning i regret it. thats my standards.
if that's MJ, i am ok with casting

Woooooooooow, are you freaking serious?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,683
Messages
22,009,205
Members
45,804
Latest member
saintpablo
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"