Shane Black Directing Predator Sequel! - Part 2

I quickly went through the script again, and the only character that fits with this guy has one scene and a few lines. It won't affect the flow of the flick. Still hyped for this.
 
Wondering if the bad press will affect it's reception tonight at TIFF.
 
Every sexual predator has friends or family. The idea that it is okay to trust them just because you care about them, no matter the evidence, no matter what they admit to, is exactly what willful ignorance is. Why you do it, is irrelevant. It was Black's choice to believe a convicted sexual predator of children for why he had to go to jail for 6 months and register as a sex offender.
So if I came to you and told you that your brother molested my child, you'd take me at my word 100%?
 
I quickly went through the script again, and the only character that fits with this guy has one scene and a few lines. It won't affect the flow of the flick. Still hyped for this.
The script you have, Is it an early or late one? Does it have the changes?
 
Almost everyone seem to have jumped on how stupid Shane is, no one thought maybe he wanted to subtly keep him in check?
 
So if I came to you and told you that your brother molested my child, you'd take me at my word 100%?
What a very BS question to ask when we know for a fact this man did what he was accused of, as he left a very large digital footprint of doing it. There isn't a question of if he did it. He did it. He pledge guilty. He is a registered sex offender for it.

He says Black knew the facts. Well those are the facts and now Black is trying to act like he didn't know the facts. Which were readily available.

Twentieth Century Fox pulls scene from 'The Predator' after director Shane Black casts his friend, a registered sex offender
Striegel said he did not have to audition for his part in the movie. “The character I played was named after a mutual friend of ours, and it seemed a good fit,” he wrote in an email.

“I've known Shane Black 14 years, well before this incident, and I think it's worth noting that he was aware of the facts,” Striegel said. “Shane can speak for himself, but I'm quite certain that if he felt I was a danger in any way to have around, he would not have.”

In emails to The Times, Striegel described her as one of his “distant relatives” who spoke to him at “several family gatherings” about “a multitude of problems she was facing, including being a truant, being pressured to do drugs and alcohol, and that she had started having sex, as well as many other things.”

In an attempt to boost her self-esteem, Striegel said he “made the the very bad judgement call of telling her in these emails that she was attractive, and sexy, and not a failure, etc.” He said he made it clear the two could not engage in a romantic relationship because of her age and because they were related.

But a March 2009 arrest warrant affidavit — which identifies the 14-year-old only as “Jane Doe” — alleges that physical contact included “kissing, touching Doe’s breast over her clothing, rubbing her legs and stroking her neck” on several occasions.

In one email message, Striegel told the girl that there was no one in the world he would rather have sex with. “I will be VERY honest: There’s no question that it’s you. None. Hope that doesn’t totally freak you out, and just because it’s what I want, and what you want, doesn’t mean it’s the right thing.”

In other correspondence, he described his sexual preferences in graphic detail, including his favorite intercourse position and intimate grooming practices.

“EVERY thing you say turns me on!!” he wrote to Doe. “I love that it rocked you when I pulled your hair that time.”

Further, Striegel cautioned the girl not to tell anyone about their clandestine relationship. “I know it might be hard for you to not tell someone, as it’s something on your mind I’m sure, but pleeease try to keep it between us ...”

The girl’s father discovered their correspondence and forbade them from talking. Still, the affidavit said, Striegel gave her a private number to call him on.

Though he lived in New York at the time, he was charged in Connecticut, where the girl lived.

Although the warrant alleged physical contact, Striegel called that claim “groundless.” “Nothing supported such a claim, and no charges in that regard were even filed. The only thing I was ever charged with were words in an email,” he told The Times.
 
The problem with this is it does not match with anything Black has said so far. If that was his plan, he has been lying the entire time so far. Which I am willing to believe, but no indication that was his idea so far and would make him look even worse. Especially if he had him on sets with kids on it. Which I think at least 3 of the movies Black has made since the conviction have all had kids on the set. And considering this guy is his friend, I doubt he was on set only to film his scenes.
 
What a very BS question to ask when we know for a fact this man did what he was accused of, as he left a very large digital footprint of doing it. There isn't a question of if he did it. He did it. He pledge guilty. He is a registered sex offender for it.

He says Black knew the facts. Well those are the facts and now Black is trying to act like he didn't know the facts. Which were readily available.

Twentieth Century Fox pulls scene from 'The Predator' after director Shane Black casts his friend, a registered sex offender
I'm just trying to say, your brother may be a pedo.
 
The problem with this is it does not match with anything Black has said so far. If that was his plan, he has been lying the entire time so far. Which I am willing to believe, but no indication that was his idea so far and would make him look even worse. Especially if he had him on sets with kids on it. Which I think at least 3 of the movies Black has made since the conviction have all had kids on the set. And considering this guy is his friend, I doubt he was on set only to film his scenes.
Assuming that what I said is how it happened, he wouldn't want his friend to know his plan, it will make things harder.
 
Assuming that what I said is how it happened, he wouldn't want his friend to know his plan, it will make things harder.
But here is the issue. His first statement says that he thought his friend got caught up in something, but was not lecherous. His second statement condemns what his friend did completely after he says he saw the evidence of what he did. How does that match up with your idea?
 
Olivia Munn's character is just meh tho. Eh. Props to Black if he made better changes to her character. lol
 
But here is the issue. His first statement says that he thought his friend got caught up in something, but was not lecherous. His second statement condemns what his friend did completely after he says he saw the evidence of what he did. How does that match up with your idea?
I am not someone with authority to try and fix the issue being discussed, so I'll just leave at that. Besides, trying to explain will just throw us in a long winded loop that will annoy everyone.
 
Really disappointed to hear this stuff about Shane.

He comes off as such a weasel with those excuses in the statement, jesus. At least admit you knew what was what, and ****ed up on a judgement call. Way easier for people to...well, not justify it, but it's something that can be forgiven if he's actually contrite on it. As it stands, it's pretty obvious he knew exactly what he was doing and was counting on the guy's past not coming to light. And now does the "he fell in with a bad crowd!" bull****, whatever that's supposed to mean.

Not sure it really rises to should-affect-his-career-majorly or anything, but it's right on the threshold. Happy Fox didn't mess around though, acted quickly.

Still gonna see the movie, but it definitely puts a dampener on it.
 
But here is the issue. His first statement says that he thought his friend got caught up in something, but was not lecherous. His second statement condemns what his friend did completely after he says he saw the evidence of what he did. How does that match up with your idea?


Maybe the evidence was only presented to him when Munn brought it to FOX's attention?
 
Maybe the evidence was only presented to him when Munn brought it to FOX's attention?
It seems he is claiming he didn't see it until he read the LA Times article. Which is all on him considering what he said.
 
Still very "we'll see" regarding the big guy. Lots of new footage there, still looks very digital though.

But :D @ the "7 feet and 400lbs of ugly mother-****er" description of the classic.
 
So, what's the consensus? Great beginning and middle, but absolutely terrible ending?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
202,368
Messages
22,092,917
Members
45,887
Latest member
Barryg
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"