This Survivor could be a "wash". Holly and I were in the process of arranging the next Survivor at LSP. No offense to Matt, but trying to do up a "hurry up" and finish Survivor for the sake of finishing a game just seems like bad idea especially if you have to resort to bringing in previously voted out players. If you have a player who was voted out, having them brought back in just ruins the dynamic of the game, imho. I know some hosts have done this, I just never thought it was a good idea.
i still think that this game should be halted, and let the new game commence.
whatever you had planned Matt, why don't you just build onto that and create a solid game to play after LSP Survivor 3?
Because I am doing the next game![]()
have you even started to plan any challenges? and has the council approved this?
also, if matt's already got some challenges and stuff put together, either host the one following that, or you guys host together and combine what you have
also 13000th POSTt:
Thing about putting it off is next game is invite only. I doubt newer players like me are getting invites to the LSP game, so we'd have to wait a lot longer to play a real game.
Thing about putting it off is next game is invite only. I doubt newer players like me are getting invites to the LSP game, so we'd have to wait a lot longer to play a real game.
Nearly all the SHH players from last Survivor on LSP were accepted. The ones that weren't didn't participate in the preliminary/qualifying round. I know you SF, we have a few spots to fill and I don't see why you wouldn't be allowed to play.
We were trying to do this in January but in lieu of Norman's departure, we have decided to move it up. However, it has not yet started yet. We will keep everyone updated.
Well, being as the players do not wish to continue, we can close the book on this. Sorry to those of you who did, 6 players just isn't enough.