Should American public schools mandate uniform dress code?

Should public schools require uniforms/uniform dress code

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
I'd like to see these stastitics and learn about the variables. I really do not believe that is the way to go. We should learn to reduce behavior without forcing everybody to be the same, so that later on we can have the best of both worlds as a society.

And are you saying you don't know what a kid looks like if he or she is not wearing a school uniform? If a police officer sees kids out skipping school, he's not going to pull them over because they aren't wearing uniforms? come on.

The latter argument isn't a major argument of mine, but if you want to use the argument that a kid won't be able to find his friends during lunch (how traumatic) because of uniform dress code, then you must be willing to concede a police officer might be able to better spot an individual or group of individuals flocking away if they all have the same clothing?
 

I could just as easily type up a page and make a link to it and post it. I'm not saying you typed that whole thing up in the last 15 minutes but still.

It is possible that it reduces some "unruly" behavior, but I still dont' believe that is the answer. I believe in social reform, but we need to get to the cause instead of just masking the symptoms. Clothing is not the cause. Something else is.

We should be finding ways to prevent bad behavior without making everybody look the same. We need to allow individuality. It's important, that future generations don't lose sight of that. I don't want to train kids at a young age that it's okay to force everybody to be a certain way, or teach them to stereo type that if somebody looks different they must be "unruly."

And clothes do help people find themselves and it helps them identify themselves. I am a completely different person than I was a teenager, and I dress completely different as well. Back then I would have felt akward dressing how I do now, and today I'd feel akward dressing how I used to back then.
 
I was thinking about that after I posted. In some instances people will save money, and in others they will lose money.


It's not like not wearing uniforms caused economic dissaray. And we still have the best economy in the world. And uniforms could hurt economies. The retail industry could take a huge hit. We could see stores closing.

No it can't. That is no reason kids should need to wear uniforms. Your get used to it only means, quit complaining, because you'll have to do it later.

Name one person who was't prepared to wear uniforms later in life because he didn't in school. Name one person who grew up to be a failure because they didn't have to wear uniforms. You see every person I've ever met in the workplace, wore uniforms. All of them. They managed to wear them just fine, even though they never had to wear them in school.


that's what your arguing. Hide them from "disrespectable clothing :whatever: hide them from dirstractions." I said expose them to diversity to help them be used to living and interacting and accepting people who are different from them. Your the one supporting a culture shock later down the road. I'm the one saying teach them to accept people with diverse cultures at a young age, before it's too late.



I didn't dress along with the social norm. Who's to say what the social norm is? Not everybody dresses the same. Different stokes for different folks. Live and let live.


They are an extension of my personality. In school, I was proud of my clothes and my outfits I picked out. It was artistic expression. You could tell I was into rock by the way I dressed, and it wasn't because I had metallica written on my shirt. It was a total extentions of my overall persona. I enjoyed it. choice of clothing is no different from choice of words, or speech patterns.

And what about the clean cut professional guy? What about the muslim girl wearing the head scarf? What about the two girls at my school who came from an Yhamish background? What about the girl with the Jesus shirts? What about kids who like to stand out or blend in? What about personal freedom?


That's good that they care about their grades.



What about that pair of Nikey's I wanted when I was 12? Or those clothes I was looking forward to? I always looked forward to getting new clothes. For me it was like getting new toys.


I am relieved that you allow them to worry about them. I figured you'd think they caused distractions and rebellion. Most pro-uniform advocates want those taken out of the curriculum, because they feel it promotes comptetiveness, jocks, kids getting made fun of for not being athletic, and a distraction from academic classes.


Nope but man and women make the clothes. And I only feel comfortable in certain clothing. As a kid I wouldn't want to be distracted by the fact that I hated the way I looked in certain clothing. If a girl is concerned because she has a flat butt, or a big butt, she should be allowed to choose her clothing in a way that disguises it.
listen we can argue til we're blue in the face... no i love expressionism... i just dont think uniforms are that bad as some of you are making it.. you can wear your nike's after school.... you can wear your GEAR after school... noon'es tellin you not to be you.. but what about the poor kids looking at you and cant afford the things you can?? they dont feel like the IN crowd our as diverse... im not tryin to hide my kids from diversity... they have their own styles out of school.. i just want them to worry about JUST school when they are in school... not who dresses cooler... and why they dont have the same pair of shoes as the MORE fortunate kids... i love being invidividuals... and i dont caer if they DONT enforce a uniform code... but im saying i dotn mind one.. its not the end of the world... and its not gonna harm us any.. i just see some of the good points and dont feel it takes away from my kids any.. they stil know they are special.. that where i come in .. its MY job to make sure they feel unique and special.. NOT their PEERS...

i whole heartedly agree with your big butt argument.. but uniforms can be tailored and altered..
 
The latter argument isn't a major argument of mine, but if you want to use the argument that a kid won't be able to find his friends during lunch (how traumatic) because of uniform dress code, then you must be willing to concede a police officer might be able to better spot an individual or group of individuals flocking away if they all have the same clothing?


You can tell looking at somebody if they are a kid or an adult most of the time.

And I don't think uniforms will have much impact. What about the 17 year old who is ahead on credits going home two hours early? What about field trips? There are a large amount of incidents where teenagers on field trips would be indistruingashable from teeangers skipping school.

In addition. We don't need police officers to worry about this. They have real criminals to worry about. We already have things called attendance records. We don't need police officers to deal with it. I believe prosecutors should be able to prosecute kids for skipping too much school, and attendance records would be more valuable, and more efficent than expecting polife officers to pull kids over for not being in school.

In addition if I was a kid skipping school, wearing a uniform, I'd just change my clothes.
 
Well if the girl is fat, then she deserves cruelty. Remeber God Hates Fatties

j/k
 
You can tell looking at somebody if they are a kid or an adult most of the time.

And I don't think uniforms will have much impact. What about the 17 year old who is ahead on credits going home two hours early? What about field trips? There are a large amount of incidents where teenagers on field trips would be indistruingashable from teeangers skipping school.

In addition. We don't need police officers to worry about this. They have real criminals to worry about. We already have things called attendance records. We don't need police officers to deal with it. I believe prosecutors should be able to prosecute kids for skipping too much school, and attendance records would be more valuable, and more efficent than expecting polife officers to pull kids over for not being in school.

In addition if I was a kid skipping school, wearing a uniform, I'd just change my clothes.
i agree not wearing uni's isn't gonna solve all our social inequities.. it's ultimately the up to the parents to instill the proper morals within the children.. uniforms may feel constricting on someones expression of themselves but THATS what i argue.. it is society that has gotten us to this conscietousness(sp)... children shouldnt be defined by their clothing.. uniforms in my eyes levels the playing field and gives kids the chance to find uniqueosity(yes not a word) on different terms..it gives them a chance to break from what society deems cool.. just my view though
 
I could just as easily type up a page and make a link to it and post it. I'm not saying you typed that whole thing up in the last 15 minutes but still.

nice excuse to ignore research.:whatever:

It is possible that it reduces some "unruly" behavior, but I still dont' believe that is the answer. I believe in social reform, but we need to get to the cause instead of just masking the symptoms. Clothing is not the cause. Something else is.

You can believe philosophy you want, but all I care about is the operations of the school. That's what the research shows, decreased unruly behavior. If I ever have a kid, I 'd like that kid to go to a school that is safe. We can talk about "social reform" and find out "what the real cause is" but that doesn't have to be mutually exclusive to use of uniformed dress code. I think you put too much value on kid's choice and fads of clothing. Furthermore, no one is suggesting that kids need to wear these uniform dress code clothes 24/7. Or even one minute after the last bell rings. But during mandatory school hours, education and discipline is key, and business is business.

We should be finding ways to prevent bad behavior without making everybody look the same. We need to allow individuality. It's important, that future generations don't lose sight of that. I don't want to train kids at a young age that it's okay to force everybody to be a certain way, or teach them to stereo type that if somebody looks different they must be "unruly."

OF course, this argument is always used whenever the "threat" of uniform dress code is proposed. I really really think you'res assigning too much value to kids clothing. Children can see individuality beyond the cloth on their skin and will have a better chance seeing without cultivating a environment where valuing clothes is norm . Let's be honest here. Kids are fickle and influenced by peer pressure and will follow the pop-culture, MTV society norm if not the uniform dress code norm.

And clothes do help people find themselves and it helps them identify themselves. I am a completely different person than I was a teenager, and I dress completely different as well. Back then I would have felt akward dressing how I do now, and today I'd feel akward dressing how I used to back then.
...
 
listen we can argue til we're blue in the face... no i love expressionism... i just dont think uniforms are that bad as some of you are making it.
They both have drawbacks, but freedom is very important, even for children.

. you can wear your nike's after school.... you can wear your GEAR after school... noon'es tellin you not to be you..
I liked to be seen in those outfits. When I got my new clothes each school year I couldn't wait to be seen in them. yeah it was stupid and childish, but I was a child, and it made me happy.

but what about the poor kids looking at you and cant afford the things you can??
To me that's more of an agrument to make when discussing economic policies. The answer there is to fight poverty.

As I was saying we can find ways to help society without elminating diversity. We need to let kids realize that there are a lot of things they can do and ways they can live. It opens their eyes to choices. America is the most diverse country in the world, and I want it to remain that way.

they dont feel like the IN crowd our as diverse... im not tryin to hide my kids from diversity... they have their own styles out of school..
But they need to be exposed to people who are different, and school is the perfect place to do that.

i just want them to worry about JUST school when they are in school...
That sounds like a boring childhood. I don't mean to sound insulting, and I'm not saying their childhood is boring. For all i know it might be exciting inspite of their uniforms. Education is important, but school offers other things besides that.

not who dresses cooler...
Kids learn lessons in life. I used to think as a kid I always had to hang out with kids with the same taste in music and clothing as me. But through exposure in my late teens I realized that was ignorant and stupid. I learned because I made mistakes in choosing friends.

and why they dont have the same pair of shoes as the MORE fortunate kids... i love being invidividuals... and i dont caer if they DONT enforce a uniform code... but im saying i dotn mind one.. its not the end of the world... and its not gonna harm us any.. i just see some of the good points and dont feel it takes away from my kids any.. they stil know they are special.. that where i come in .. its MY job to make sure they feel unique and special.. NOT their PEERS...
but mommy and daddy wont always be there for them. Love from Mommy and Daddy isn't enough for a good life.

i whole heartedly agree with your big butt argument.. but uniforms can be tailored and altered..
color and fabric make a big difference in that department. Big girls sometimes prefer to wear larger clothing. If a girl is embarassed about being flat chested, she might try to make up for it by wearing clothing that showes off her butt, so she doesn't feel so insecure about her looks. I'm not saying we should promote kids having sex, but we know kids are never going to stop being concerned with how attractive they look, no matter what we do.
 
You can tell looking at somebody if they are a kid or an adult most of the time.

And I don't think uniforms will have much impact. What about the 17 year old who is ahead on credits going home two hours early? What about field trips? There are a large amount of incidents where teenagers on field trips would be indistruingashable from teeangers skipping school.

In addition. We don't need police officers to worry about this. They have real criminals to worry about. We already have things called attendance records. We don't need police officers to deal with it. I believe prosecutors should be able to prosecute kids for skipping too much school, and attendance records would be more valuable, and more efficent than expecting polife officers to pull kids over for not being in school.

In addition if I was a kid skipping school, wearing a uniform, I'd just change my clothes.

Ok, I guess we can sit here and think up "but what if scenarios"....the point I was making that is might be safe for the kid. If walking home alone in a uniform,....people know that is a student from a distance. A predator cannot say he or she didn't know it was a student. Kids will be discouraged from skipping school if they have to figure out how to change clothes, sneak out..etc.... This is not a major argument for uniform dress code, just a small added one. No one is talking about arresting students.
 
i wear a uniform in work,so schools should make kids wear uniforms as well,besides,parents won't have to spend $500 on school clothes for thier kids.
 
Ok, I guess we can sit here and think up "but what if scenarios"....the point I was making that is might be safe for the kid. If walking home alone in a uniform,....people know that is a student from a distance. A predator cannot say he or she didn't know it was a student.
what are you talking about? "Yeah I raped her, but I thought she was an adult." It would never matter. Assault on a kid is assault on a kid. You don't not get charged with assaulting a minor because you thought they were an adult. If your talking about statutory rape, that just going out on a limb, and is not large enough to have a role in this debate.

Kids will be discouraged from skipping school if they have to figure out how to change clothes,
They already know how to change their clothes. It's easy.

sneak out..etc...

:huh: If they have to figure out how to sneak out? It has nothing to do with uniforms, unless your going to put tracking devices in their uniforms now, which it would probably lead to. Before you know it, they will have an alarm system set to go off whenever one of those uniforms crosses school grounds. And besides WE DON'T NEED UNIFROMS FOR THIS. WE HAVE ATTENDANCE RECORDS. WE DON'T NEED TO TALK ABOUT CATCHING KIDS SNEAK OUT. IF THEY AREN'T IN CLASS, EVERYBODY KNOWS THEY AREN'T IN CLASS, BECAUSE THEY AREN'T IN CLASSS.

.
This is not a major argument for uniform dress code, just a small added one. No one is talking about arresting students.

You said it would be easy for police officers to spot a group of kids not in school if they are wearing uniforms. I don't think we should be tagging students anyways. It's like making inmates wear orange, so if they escape we will all know they are inmates running down the street.
 
i wear a uniform in work,so schools should make kids wear uniforms as well,besides,parents won't have to spend $500 on school clothes for thier kids.

How does you wearing one at work mean kids should wear them at school? What do you feel like you aren't equal to the children?

How about you wear one at work, therefore they should have to wear one when they grow up and go to work.
 
They both have drawbacks, but freedom is very important, even for children.
agreed look at my avy... but parents have been dressing kids for years and YOUR parents give you your freedom.. you dont have it when you're a kid...
spidey said:
I liked to be seen in those outfits. When I got my new clothes each school year I couldn't wait to be seen in them. yeah it was stupid and childish, but I was a child, and it made me happy.

To me that's more of an agrument to make when discussing economic policies. The answer there is to fight poverty.
both of these are again social views and a matter of pride... you can feel good about your outfits but the poor kids cant???? you are subjecting kids to not only diversity but social heirarchy ..KIDS should be KIDS.. and not worry about whos the poorer or cooler.. that is a FUNNER environment for kids..
spidey said:
But they need to be exposed to people who are different, and school is the perfect place to do that.
clothes arent the main difference in which they should be exposed.. they WILL be subjected to different intellects views and cultures... what the heck do kids have to learn from dressing different???

spidey said:
That sounds like a boring childhood. I don't mean to sound insulting, and I'm not saying their childhood is boring. For all i know it might be exciting inspite of their uniforms. Education is important, but school offers other things besides that.

Kids learn lessons in life. I used to think as a kid I always had to hang out with kids with the same taste in music and clothing as me. But through exposure in my late teens I realized that was ignorant and stupid. I learned because I made mistakes in choosing friends.
see above post.. there are other lessons to be learned .. what great mentor led made a speech about being CLOTHED equally or different..fashion is always A SOCIAL factor.. never has it been a moral fiber.. i'm sorry you think fashion is the ONLY exciting thing in a childhood.. cause i dont remember what i used to wear when i was kid.. just remember my friends and the good times we had playing kick the can.. video games and baseball.... never did i regret not having the new NIke's... my priorities lay(lied whatever) elsewhere

spidey said:
but mommy and daddy wont always be there for them. Love from Mommy and Daddy isn't enough for a good life.
mommy and daddy SHOULD always be there for them.. THAT is what is wrong with society.... BEING there is THEE most important part of parenting... instilling other factors in my kids life is good enough for me.. my kids will not judge otehr kids by the clothes they wear.. that moral will be around long after i am gone.. in a sense that moral is me... and when my kids are thirty i can still give them advice and pick them up. i will ALWAYS be there for them... if clothes define the value of my kids life then i have FAILED my kids..

spidey said:
color and fabric make a big difference in that department. Big girls sometimes prefer to wear larger clothing. If a girl is embarassed about being flat chested, she might try to make up for it by wearing clothing that showes off her butt, so she doesn't feel so insecure about her looks. I'm not saying we should promote kids having sex, but we know kids are never going to stop being concerned with how attractive they look, no matter what we do.

there are diff types of uniforms.. overalls. jumpsuits.. and navy blue is pretty concealing as well as white button up shirts... and no kids shouldnt show off their butt.. lets see you argue that point when you have a daughter...
 
what are you talking about? "Yeah I raped her, but I thought she was an adult." It would never matter. Assault on a kid is assault on a kid. You don't not get charged with assaulting a minor because you thought they were an adult. If your talking about statutory rape, that just going out on a limb, and is not large enough to have a role in this debate.

Hmm..nice...if you say so. :whatever: As I said before, this was a minor argument, but it seems obvious guys will less likely approach a 17-year old in uniform than without uniform. If an officer or neighbor sees this behavior, there is no question alarm bells should ring.


They already know how to change their clothes. It's easy.

But it will discourage the behavior....any obstacle is an obstacle.

:huh: If they have to figure out how to sneak out? It has nothing to do with uniforms, unless your going to put tracking devices in their uniforms now, which it would probably lead to. Before you know it, they will have an alarm system set to go off whenever one of those uniforms crosses school grounds. And besides WE DON'T NEED UNIFROMS FOR THIS. WE HAVE ATTENDANCE RECORDS. WE DON'T NEED TO TALK ABOUT CATCHING KIDS SNEAK OUT. IF THEY AREN'T IN CLASS, EVERYBODY KNOWS THEY AREN'T IN CLASS, BECAUSE THEY AREN'T IN CLASSS.


You said it would be easy for police officers to spot a group of kids not in school if they are wearing uniforms. I don't think we should be tagging students anyways. It's like making inmates wear orange, so if they escape we will all know they are inmates running down the street.

So, the student should be in school... if a police officer sees someone in a uniform from far away, they can obtain the student before he becomes a missing or exploited child or criminal, as opposed to if the student was not wearing a uniform. If the student should be in school, yes the teacher should be able to find out...but in the meanwhile,....the student is not in school. Assuming the student is wearing one, it will be easier to find the child. If the student is not wearing one, this it is no different that if there were no uniform dress code at all.
 
agreed look at my avy... but parents have been dressing kids for years and YOUR parents give you your freedom.. you dont have it when you're a kid...
and now your advocating taking that freedom away from their parents.

both of these are again social views and a matter of pride... you can feel good about your outfits but the poor kids cant???? you are subjecting kids to not only diversity but social heirarchy ..KIDS should be KIDS.. and not worry about whos the poorer or cooler.. that is a FUNNER environment for kids..
that's economic inequality, which wont change because of school uniforms. Your talking about poverty, which is irrelevant to this debate. Fighting poverty is the answer to that.

clothes arent the main difference in which they should be exposed.. they WILL be subjected to different intellects views and cultures... what the heck do kids have to learn from dressing different???

That not everybody is the same, nor should they be. Clothes are very easily noticeable.

see above post.. there are other lessons to be learned .. what great mentor led made a speech about being CLOTHED equally or different..fashion is always A SOCIAL factor.. never has it been a moral fiber.. i'm sorry you think fashion is the ONLY exciting thing in a childhood..
So because it's not the "only" one that means it doesn't count?

cause i dont remember what i used to wear when i was kid..
You can't remember?

mommy and daddy SHOULD always be there for them.. THAT is what is wrong with society.... BEING there is THEE most important part of parenting... instilling other factors in my kids life is good enough for me.. my kids will not judge otehr kids by the clothes they wear.. that moral will be around long after i am gone.. in a sense that moral is me... and when my kids are thirty i can still give them advice and pick them up. i will ALWAYS be there for them... if clothes define the value of my kids life then i have FAILED my kids..
You can't always be there. It's not possible. They will grow up and they will leave the nest. Are you going to hold their hand while they go to the bathroom at school? When they are at school finding their social niche and trying to get accepted, are you going to sit there and say, "don't fret it son. So the girls don't like you. But you don't care because you got us?"

It will never work.

Are you going to be there at their job? In the room when they first have sex? Always living with them?

there are diff types of uniforms.. overalls. jumpsuits.. and navy blue is pretty concealing as well as white button up shirts... and no kids shouldnt show off their butt.. lets see you argue that point when you have a daughter...


eyeyeyeye. I guess nobody should ever be allowed to do anything? If a girl wants to wear snug pants than she should be able to wear snug pants. You can't suck the life out of everything or we might as well all be dead. Sexual attraction and showing off is a normal healthy human trait, which makes life worth living. It's one of the few human traits that are worth having.

Snug pants and nice asses on girls made school awesome.
 
and now your advocating taking that freedom away from their parents.


that's economic inequality, which wont change because of school uniforms. Your talking about poverty, which is irrelevant to this debate. Fighting poverty is the answer to that.



That not everybody is the same, nor should they be. Clothes are very easily noticeable.


So because it's not the "only" one that means it doesn't count?


You can't remember?


You can't always be there. It's not possible. They will grow up and they will leave the nest. Are you going to hold their hand while they go to the bathroom at school? When they are at school finding their social niche and trying to get accepted, are you going to sit there and say, "don't fret it son. So the girls don't like you. But you don't care because you got us?"

It will never work.

Are you going to be there at their job? In the room when they first have sex? Always living with them?




eyeyeyeye. I guess nobody should ever be allowed to do anything? If a girl wants to wear snug pants than she should be able to wear snug pants. You can't suck the life out of everything or we might as well all be dead. Sexual attraction and showing off is a normal healthy human trait, which makes life worth living. It's one of the few human traits that are worth having.

Snug pants and nice asses on girls made school awesome.
okay obviously you're getting heated with sentinelmind and NOT reading or refusing to understand what i write..and it's becoming childish retorts....:whatever:


carry on.. it was pretty intellectual while it lasted
 
So, the student should be in school... if a police officer sees someone in a uniform from far away, they can obtain the student before he becomes a missing or exploited child or criminal, as opposed to if the student was not wearing a uniform. If the student should be in school, yes the teacher should be able to find out...but in the meanwhile,....the student is not in school. Assuming the student is wearing one, it will be easier to find the child. If the student is not wearing one, this it is no different that if there were no uniform dress code at all.

I'm sorry I think your bordering on insane now. It would be horribly inefficent. A waste of the officer's time and the kids time who shouldn't be stopped. Just because a kid isn't in school, that doesn't mean they are skipping school.

I remember during my senior year, I had to leave school to report for drug tests every week. According to you, I should have been stopped, questioned, and ID'd by a cop every time, missing even more school.

And all the students ahead on credits leaving school an hour and a half early, or 3 hours early, or 4 and a half, should have been stopped and harassed by a cop.

We don't need to. And most of the kids I know in school who had good grades skipped once in a while. They weren't problem kids, and in that instance it wasn't a problem. It's the habitual skippers that need to be stopped.

No we dont' need police officers grabbing students off the streets. We don't need to MOVE ON THE DOUBLE, NOW, NOW, NOW, MOVE MOVE MOVE over every little thing a kid does. We don't need teachers calling the cops because a kid isn't in class, saying search for this kid. "I'd like a clothing description mam. What's the kid wearing?" "The same thing every other kid is wearing right now"

Attendnace records are good enough. Your going for overkill here. These aren't terrorists. They are children.
 
okay obviously you're getting heated with sentinelmind and NOT reading or refusing to understand what i write..and it's becoming childish retorts....:whatever:


carry on.. it was pretty intellectual while it lasted

I'm sorry but that is a cop out post. Every thing I said in there is true. He said his keed doesn't need acceptance or to feel unique and special at school, because his parents do that for him. That sounds like a recipe for Jeffery Dhamer to me. And I pointed out parents are not always going to be there making everything better, and Rekal thinks he will always be there making everything better. He's wrong, and I specifically pointed that out.

And it's true. We can't suck the fun out of everything. I made specific relevant points, and this is an example people needing to learn to live and let live, and drop the bigotry. Not everybody is the same, nor should they be. If I dont' want to stop my kid from wearing something at school, just because you don't like it, well then tough ****.
 
I'm sorry but that is a cop out post. Every thing I said in there is true. He said his keed doesn't need acceptance or to feel unique and special at school, because his parents do that for him. That sounds like a recipe for Jeffery Dhamer to me. And I pointed out parents are not always going to be there making everything better, and Rekal thinks he will always be there making everything better. He's wrong, and I specifically pointed that out.

And it's true. We can't suck the fun out of everything. I made specific relevant points, and this is an example people needing to learn to live and let live, and drop the bigotry. Not everybody is the same, nor should they be. If I dont' want to stop my kid from wearing something at school, just because you don't like it, well then tough ****.
omg for advocating such diversity you are so narrow minded..

nowhere do i say diversity isnt a must... but i praise equality just the same... people shouldnt be judged by their clothes just as much as their skin color... clothes are a social disorder...if you cant find yourself through poetry..sports.. dance.. music... and CLOTHES is your ONLY form of expression then i feel sorry for you.. were your parents not there for you.. YES your parents will and SHOULD always be there for you its a sad day when society ACCEPTS neglect of a child.... yes kids need to learn on their own.. doesnt mean parents cant pick them up when they fall.. why do we as parents go through such lessons oursleves aif not to help our children through theirs.. obviously your naivte(sp) says that we give birht to our children and then let them go... YOU my friend are wrong i will ALWAYS be ther to help my child..in any way i can.. whether you beleive it or not is not my concern... when you have kids.. i would like to see you say you WONT be there.. and you praise expressionism and individualism... yet... renounce change to social disfunction... should i allow my child to think its okay for a guy like you to wana stare at her butt cause it was fun in high school... whos morals are wrong???sounds like a recipe for Ted Bundy

you fail to understand the views of someone else and i was polite and understanding in yours and you came with childish rants and emo kid tantrums... that is why i stop the debate..

when we will teach our kids that they are all the same and NOT different..edit: you probably already quoted the other one.. i meant to say accept others differences

how is that bigotry??? excuse me for teaching my kids love.. and that clothes arent as important as character
 
Anything that keeps emo boys from wearing women’s jeans. :up:
 
I wouldn't mind it so much if the public schools paid for the uniforms. If the families have to pay for it then I say no.
 
Besides, You can't go wrong with this look.:wow: :woot:

UA8879.jpg
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
202,294
Messages
22,081,648
Members
45,881
Latest member
lucindaschatz
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"