Sequels SHOULD Singer even return to the X-Men franchise?

Sound Singer return?

  • Yes, I want things to go possibly back to the way they were.

  • No, I want to see what someone else can do with the franchise.

  • Don't really care as long as the franchise lives back up to its potential.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What in God's name does a statement abotu Magneto using Jean have to do with that element of the film?

I don't know.

AGAIN, in response to a question about team work and screen time, YOU were the one who pointed out that "Wolverine saved the day from Dark Phoenix, but Jean helped him do so" which is the bulk of the back and forths of the posts right now.

So I don't know where you gathered Magneto using Jean as part of this conversation...

It's no accident or mistake that everything else is getting destroyed and Wolverine isn't.
Then it speaks to Jean's character that she'd allow Dark Phoenix to annihilate everything around her SAVE FOR WOLVERINE.

...or it could've just been bad writing.
 
I'm not sure why people are quibbling over the Wolverine/Phoenix climax.

Wolverine says to Storm that Jean 'is still in there somewhere', which is evidenced by the fact that she mentally contacts him to come to Magneto's camp.

Jean obviously is in there somewhere.

And Phoenix is toying with him, for sure, mocking him for daring to try to approach her. Jean is obviously in there, because she emerges when Logan says 'not for them, for you'. It's fair to interpret that there is some mental struggle going on between Jean and Phoenix, that Jean isn't lost forever, and that is borne out by the fact that Jean gains control and allows herself to die.

It's the same principle as in the comics in which Jean momentarily regains control and allows an alien weapon to fire on her and kill her. In this case, she allows Wolverine to stab her.

Just because people are bitter about it not being Cyclops in that scene does not make it 'bad writing' - it just means you don't like it and feel bitter about it. That's your problem, not the fault of the movie or its writing. End of argument.
 
And are we now supposed to stop arguing our cases because you so eloquently told us "End of argument"?

I agree there is a struggle between Jean and Phoenix.

What's bad writing is Jean, who supposedly is one of the good guys, allows Phoenix to destroy everything in Phoenix' path with the exception of Wolverine.

Bad Writing. "End of argument." :dry:
 
Last edited:
And are we now supposed to stop arguing our cases because you so eloquently told us "End of argument"?

I agree there is a struggle between Jean and Phoenix.

What's bad writing is Jean, who supposedly is one of the good guys, allows Phoenix to destroy everything in Phoenix' path with the exception of Wolverine.

Bad Writing. "End of argument." :dry:

The Jean/Phoenix struggle reached a point where Jean had to sacrifice herself to stop it. That's simple and obvious.

Cyclops died because Jean was caught off guard by the newly freed Phoenix power/personality taking over. The 'reborn' Jean suddenly felt alive with energy but that energy came with a second personality that burst free with a colossal wave of force which Xavier and Callisto both detected.

Phoenix hated the fact she had been contained and controlled more than anything - and that hate was directed at Xavier. A hate and a rage that allowed Phoenix to take over and destroy him, despite Jean's struggle to stop it. That is borne out by the deleted scene with psychic voices in which you can hear Jean trying to help but unable to stop the intense fury of Phoenix. Simple.

Phoenix was destroying everything on the island, everyone was fleeing, but then Wolverine dared to approach. Phoenix toyed with the man who dared to challenge her, his healing power and adamantium gave him an added advantage in being able to withstand her bursts of energy towards him (you can even see the waves of energy in the film). It's reasonable to assume that, as on other occasions, Jean was also battling to regain control, which she managed. Simple.

I don't know why everyone is making it so so complicated and so difficult to understand.

It's fine to say you hate that it wasn't Cyclops, but what happened from a storytelling view is pretty clear.

Also, Magneto hoped that he might rely on Jean as his ultimate weapon but, unfortunately for him, she wasn't going to be ordered about by anyone. She had become so powerful that everything else seemed a petty squabble unless she was directly targeted. The fact that she stands there at Alcatraz looking aloof and godlike and unconcerned with human troubles means that she was intended to look aloof and godlike and unconcerned with human troubles, even if we would rather have seen the character with more obvious characterisation and interpersonal reactions.

Simple.
 
It's not hard to understand. It's all because of Wolverine that Jean and everyone is "saved." If he wasn't there, evil would win. Apparently Jean is too weak to do it herself, and everyone else is useless. You might want to desperately believe that Jean letting Wolverine save her is the same as Jean being the one to do it herself, but it's not.

And you said earlier that Jean letting the machine kill her is the same as letting Wolverine kill her. It's really not. Jean activated the gun herself, and redeemed herself, because all her friends loved her too much to do it, and weren't strong enough. In the movie, Wolverine was the only reason Jean came through, because she was too weak and only he was strong enough.

You know, you and the Guard claim that it's so obvious that Jean is holding back when attacking Wolverine, and coming up with elaborate excuses as to why. Couldn't the movie have done that? No where in the movie is any of this clear, no exposition or anything. Maybe some acting from Famke as Logan is walking up to her while she's "toying with him" or struggling with herself (which one is it guys? both?) could have made things clear. But as it is, Wolverine is healing stupidly fast, and that was the key to beating her.

I guess the writers made it ambiguous on purpose. It makes Wolverine look like the awesome hero that Fox and general audiences love (which was the bases for the entire film), but also gives some illusion that there was something more going on, and those who want to defend the movie have something to cling on to. The fans can debate it, because thanks to the movie, we'll never know.
 
Last edited:
I don't know.

AGAIN, in response to a question about team work and screen time, YOU were the one who pointed out that "Wolverine saved the day from Dark Phoenix, but Jean helped him do so" which is the bulk of the back and forths of the posts right now
.

Okay...but what does me saying THAT...

Have to do with THIS?

She didn't need to do anything, as she wasn't directly threatened. When she did need to...she did.

Because that is my most recent statement that you've responded to. With this:

The original argument was that the rest of the X-men did not get to do much, that Wolverine got to do the bulk of the heroics/screentime in the third film. You, in fact, just proved it.

Two things.

1. My statement about Jean not doing anything and why, had NOTHING to do with what you call "the original argument". We are wayyy beyond that point.

2. You addressed my statement about Dark Phoenix and why she did or didn't do anything, and only this statement, and you tied it to some random statement you made about the X-Men's equal playing time, despite the fact that they have nothing to do with each other.

She didn't need to do anything, as she wasn't directly threatened. When she did need to...she did.

Which had NOTHING to do with Wolverine getting the bulk of screentime, and everything to do with the reason she didn't act until the end of the film.

Here's the chain of responses, so you'll see why I'm confused:

THE OVERLORD
There was a giant battle right in front of her and she just stands there, why is she there if she isn't going to do anything?

ME
She didn't need to do anything, as she wasn't directly threatened. When she did need to...she did.

YOU
The original argument was that the rest of the X-men did not get to do much, that Wolverine got to do the bulk of the heroics/screentime in the third film. You, in fact, just proved it.


How does my statement, which has NOTHING to do with Wolverine getting the bulk of hero time, prove that Wolverine got the bulk of the heroic/screentime, which, btw, I never even debated on?

I think you are still talking about this, which I believe you said yesterday:

Correct me if I'm wrong but the main complaint from the previous posts was that based off of the first two X-men movies, the rest of the X-men did not get to do anything, that there was no teamwork, only having Wolverine save the day both times. "Wolverine got the lion's share of the screentime, both outings" they argue.

Then added that in contrast, X3 gave equal roles, having "Wolverine save the day from the Phoenix, with Jean helping him."

My question is how does Jean just standing there, allowing herself to be gutted out, an argument FOR X3 giving equal amount of screentime for the rest of the team, much less Jean. She was JUST standing there!


In case my response to this wasn't clear enough...I never even implied that Jean helping Wolverine was an argument for "equal screentime". I don't know why you would ever have thought that.

The best argument for a decent amount of screentime for all the X-Men is the actual team moments, and the nature of the final battle, where the X-Men displayed teamwork and most of them got solo moments. Jean assisting Wolverine in defeating Dark Phoenix is just an argument for him not doing it all on his own. Because he didn't. He couldn't have.

So I don't know where you gathered Magneto using Jean as part of this conversation...

Because I was talking about Magneto and Jean's interactions, and Magneto's plans for Jean, which was the more recent conversation.

Then it speaks to Jean's character that she'd allow Dark Phoenix to annihilate everything around her SAVE FOR WOLVERINE.

...or it could've just been bad writing.

Of course it speaks to Jean's character.

She and Wolverine were friends. They had feelings for each other, etc.
 
I don't know why everyone is making it so so complicated and so difficult to understand.

Nor do I. I suspect it's just bitterness and hated and a desire to tear down every element of a film that disappointed them.

Also, Magneto hoped that he might rely on Jean as his ultimate weapon but, unfortunately for him, she wasn't going to be ordered about by anyone. She had become so powerful that everything else seemed a petty squabble unless she was directly targeted. The fact that she stands there at Alcatraz looking aloof and godlike and unconcerned with human troubles means that she was intended to look aloof and godlike and unconcerned with human troubles, even if we would rather have seen the character with more obvious characterisation and interpersonal reactions.

Simple.

Exactly.

Magneto was "mentoring" Jean throughout the film. He found out pretty quickly that he wasn't going to be able to control or truly manipulate her into doing what he wanted, so he hoped to have her join his cause instead, to have her as an ace in the hole if things went really South. He appealed to her ideas about being cured, after it happened to him, in a last ditch effort to prevent the cure from continuing to exist.

Mad Ones, you sound so ridiculously bitter at this point that it's difficult to take anything you're saying seriously. Seriously, tell us what you really think about the adaption of the Dark Phoenix saga and Wolverine's capability in this franchise?

Calling Jean "weak" after she overcomes the Dark Phoenix strikes me as absurd.

You know, you and the Guard claim that it's so obvious that Jean is holding back when attacking Wolverine, and coming up with elaborate excuses as to why. Couldn't the movie have done that? No where in the movie is any of this clear, no exposition or anything. Maybe some acting from Famke as Logan is walking up to her while she's "toying with him" or struggling with herself (which one is it guys? both?) could have made things clear. But as it is, Wolverine is healing stupidly fast, and that was the key to beating her.

When you say things like "Maybe some acting as Logan is walking up", I just want to laugh.

Watch. Her. Performance. Closely. It's subtle. But it's there.

The rest is simple logic. She is using a RIDICULOUS amount of power in that scene, and the destructive everywhere but on Logan is massive.

Had she been taking him apart at the rate she was taking others apart, he'd be nothing but a skeleton, and who knows, she might even have been able to take THAT apart, too.

She was clealry not attacking him with the same rate of disintigration as the others. Not just because he was healing quickly, but because she simply WASN'T. She wasn't even attacking his whole form, just pieces of him. It's VERY clear when you compare what she does to the soldiers to what she's doing to Wolverine, and also to Xavier.

It's not an elaborate excuse at all. It's the simplest one I can think of, actually. It's freaking OBVIOUS she's not attacking him with the same ferocity as everything else is being attacked with, and the reason why should ALSO be obvious if you watched any of the previous films and this one.

The movie shouldn't have to explain the obvious, especially after it spent several scenes setting up Wolverine's connection to Jean in this film. The writers expect you to understand these simple concepts by the end of the film. That Jean, deep down, knows what has to be done. That she and Logan have a connection. That Jean is able on some level to fight the influence of Dark Phoenix, and knows she must.

Now, you all talk about bad writing.

You know what's bad writing?

This:

BOBBY
"I don't get it...why isn't she blowing him away?"

STORM
"She's...she's fighting Dark Phoenix for control.

BEAST
That's why he isn't disintigrating as fast as everything else. She's...she's holding back."


Good lord.

Screenwriting 101. Show, don't tell.

ESPECIALLY during moments of high drama.

I guess the writers made it ambiguous on purpose. It makes Wolverine look like the awesome hero that Fox and general audiences love (which was the bases for the entire film), but also gives some illusion that there was something more going on, and those who want to defend the movie have something to cling on to. The fans can debate it, because thanks to the movie, we'll never know.

Her simply deciding not to kill him doesn't make Wolverine any less awesome. His healing abilities are still really cool, as are his claws, his fighting skills, his hair, etc.

Yes...we'll never know if it was a sudden attack of bad writing, or if it was the professional writers wrapping up the structured story arc they spent the entire film setting up for Jean and Wolverine.
 
Last edited:
Famke's face was all special effects in that scene. That's laughable that you think a computer can simulate actual acting.

Xavier was trying to restore the mental blocks when Jean was struggling, and than she destroyed him (obviously she was struggling and that's why it was taking so long). The same thing was happening with Wolverine, but because his healing factor decided to be extra awesome that day he didn't meet the same fate as Xavier. Bad writing. The "toying with him" excuse is laughable.

Good writers would have made including some exposition work. But seeing the rest of the movie, maybe cutting out dialogue and explanation was a good thing, because I honestly doubt they could have pulled it off.

When defending the movie you reach extra far in your explanations. The movie didn't make it obvious and it's evident by so many here debating it. We're not stupid, we're just explaining the movie on how we see it, and have extremely valid points.
 
Yes, how would a character with computer effects ever emote?

Not obvious is called "subtle".

Hate the movie some more. I'm watching it right now and having a blast.
 
No basis at all?

So the writers just FORGOT the level of power she was at? Come. On.

You are the one who needs to come.on Guard, IMO you are giving the writers, who have written numerous poor movies, far too much credit. I dont think they forgot what level of power she was at all, but they did make Wolverine godlike just so Wolverine could save the day, I see no indication if DP holding back in this scene, non at all.

It's pretty apparent in her performance that even as Dark Phoenix strains to blow him away, there's something going on there beneath the surface, some kind of conflict. Is it the most clear thing ever? No. But the fact that she bothered to put that into her performance coupled with the fact that she obviously was not using her full power against Wolverine despite using it all around him would tend to suggest something more than meets the eye is going on in that sequence.

Sorry, but I see no conflict, I see DP trying to blow Logan to high heaven, and getting frustrated at the fact she isnt able to do so, Jean isnt in the scene until the Logan says "For you" which is another thing that makes me laugh seeing as Logan was the one who told Scott "maybe its time we all move on" earlier, some love that is.

But again, Jean isnt in the scene until Logan utters those words and THEN, you see a change come over, but not before i'm afraid.



That IS the indication that she's holding back. Look at the levels of power she's using...except on Wolverine, who is trying to reach her, and has been trying to reach her throughout the film.

Sorry, but no, its no indication at all except the film-makers were clueless and used a deus ex machina in making Wolverine godlike to save the day. Not saying the other movies didnt use such things, but they used them so much better than at the end of X3 it is unbelievable.

People, I'm not saying it's the most clear or best handled element ever. It could easily have been handled better, or differently, sure. But this isn't a scene they just farted out. You don't spend millions and millions of dollars in effects and not look at subtlies of expression, what's going on in the scene, etc.

It's no accident or mistake that everything else is getting destroyed and Wolverine isn't.

Now, there's no mathematical proof of this, or of the level of her powers, and how that works. There's no formula you can apply to explain why Dark Phoenix does or doesn't do this or that in a particular moment. You have to use some logic. You either see it or you don't. Is it open to interpretation a bit? Probably. Darn near every performance or visual is, in a sense. But would you really rather believe the writers and creators just FORGOT what was going on between Jean and Logan throughout the film (despite the fact that they developed the angle) and suddenly, despite him not being so in any other sequence, made Logan into a GOD, or believe that they capitalized on the themes and story they'd been developing since the beginning of the film?

Seeing as most people despise the scene because Logan IS made into an unkillable God and is the hero again. Once again, I see no Jean in the scene until Logan says "For you" (which again as I pointed out above, I found ridiculous anyway considering his earlier comments), that is the very first time in the scene that Jean appears. The fact that you are saying its not the most clear or well handled aspect SHOWS that the scene was poorly written and poorly executed, especially if they were going for what you suggest they were.
 
You can't hide behind subtleties when they've been so highly debated (this kind of undermines subtleties, doesn't it?)

Maybe I'll pop in X1 or 2, and see how a decent movie is done. It's on!

(Edit: For the record, I totally agree with AVEITWITHJAMON)
 
Last edited:
Subtle acting and writing are subtle acting and writing.

I already watched X-MEN and X2 recently. Figured it was time X3 got a shot.
 
Famke's face was all special effects in that scene. That's laughable that you think a computer can simulate actual acting.

Xavier was trying to restore the mental blocks when Jean was struggling, and than she destroyed him (obviously she was struggling and that's why it was taking so long). The same thing was happening with Wolverine, but because his healing factor decided to be extra awesome that day he didn't meet the same fate as Xavier. Bad writing. The "toying with him" excuse is laughable.

Good writers would have made including some exposition work. But seeing the rest of the movie, maybe cutting out dialogue and explanation was a good thing, because I honestly doubt they could have pulled it off.

When defending the movie you reach extra far in your explanations. The movie didn't make it obvious and it's evident by so many here debating it. We're not stupid, we're just explaining the movie on how we see it, and have extremely valid points.

Exactly, at the end of the day Guard can go on and on about how "FREAKING obvious" his observations are, yet its FREAKING obvious to me that Jean isnt holding back in that scene, as I have pointed out, you see DP VISIBLY straining in one scene just before the majority of Logan's front chest is blown off, sorry but that isnt holding back or 'toying' with someone, and thats FREAKING obvious to me.
 
You can't hide behind subtleties when they've been so highly debated (this kind of undermines subtleties, doesn't it?)

Maybe I'll pop in X1 or 2, and see how a decent movie is done. It's on!

(Edit: For the record, I totally agree with AVEITWITHJAMON)

:up: I watched X2 tonight and it is still an amazing movie, its just so dissapointing what followed it.
 
You are the one who needs to come.on Guard, IMO you are giving the writers, who have written numerous poor movies, far too much credit.

Who would have thought the writers behind films like xXx: State of the Union and Elektra could have wrote a film with such subtlety and nuance? :wow:
 
You are the one who needs to come.on Guard, IMO you are giving the writers, who have written numerous poor movies, far too much credit. I dont think they forgot what level of power she was at all, but they did make Wolverine godlike just so Wolverine could save the day, I see no indication if DP holding back in this scene, non at all.

The writers' previous films really have no bearing on the content of X3. Don't create straw arguments. Nevermind that even their crappy other films had proper structure, which tends to suggest that THE LAST STAND would have as well, and that they would not just have "forgotten" how to write structure and wrap up their main two characters' arcs in the last scene of the biggest movie they've ever written.

So...Wolverine doing what he's always done...healing from wounds...is suddenly godlike? By the way. He healed that quickly in the beginning of X3, in the Danger Room, too.

You've been told in detail why it's clear that Dark Phoenix is holding back. Stop just thinking "I hate X3" and ignoring the obvious.

Look how FAST Dark Phoenix vaporizes the soldiers, almost instantly. The buildings. The vehicles.

But she suddenly she's just able to vaporize Logan's skin slowly? In little pieces?

And you think she's at full power, and not holding back? Are you KIDDING me?

She is OBVIOUSLY not operating at full power while attacking Wolverine. Ergo...she is, in fact, either holding back or weakening. Either one of these means one thing: JEAN IS FIGHTING FOR CONTROL.

Sorry, but I see no conflict, I see DP trying to blow Logan to high heaven, and getting frustrated at the fact she isnt able to do so, Jean isnt in the scene until the Logan says "For you" which is another thing that makes me laugh seeing as Logan was the one who told Scott "maybe its time we all move on" earlier, some love that is.

But again, Jean isnt in the scene until Logan utters those words and THEN, you see a change come over, but not before i'm afraid.

You're not GOING to see a major change in CHARACTER until the very end. Dark Phoenix is in control until then, at least in some control, because again, suddenly she's struggling to blow apart a person. But you do see Dark Phoenix struggling as the scene progresses. Now, why do you think Dark Phoenix would ever struggle? To destroy some skin? Really? You think it just takes THAT much effort for her to destroy a few patches of skin, when she was vaporizing dozens of people just moments before?

Or you think perhaps, just perhaps, it takes that much effort because Jean, who is still there, doesn't want Dark Phoenix to blow Logan to pieces, or to strip his skeleton and flesh from the feet up as she did to everyone else in the area?

Sorry, but no, its no indication at all except the film-makers were clueless and used a deus ex machina in making Wolverine godlike to save the day. Not saying the other movies didnt use such things, but they used them so much better than at the end of X3 it is unbelievable.

I'll be honest...I hardly even know what this sentence means. It just sounds like you being bitter. Not only because you just...sound bitter, but because you're being illogical, and apparently don't understand what a Deux Ex Machina actually is.

Wolverine's healing abilities aren't a Deux Ex Machine, because they aren't new. They've been there since the beginning of the franchise. Him healing quickly isn't new either. And reaching someone emotionally, especially when an emotional arc exists within the film and previous films between two characters isn't a Deaux Ex Machina element, either. A Deux Ex Machina is something that appears out of the blue, without previously having been set up as an important element in a story. You can't say that about Wolverine's healing ability, or his connection to Jean/Dark Phoenix.

Right after she opens up his chest, etc, that's the biggest moment of conflict you see from her. She sees he's still coming, and that he's not going to stop. And you're right, she starts visibly trembling, and there are flashes of recognition, etc. And this is the giveaway. She starts trembling. Not just her face, or head, but her whole form tenses up, and it starts actually looking like she has to exert some effort, where before she looked pretty damn relaxed and confident in what she was doing.

She's not trembling because it takes Dark Phoenix a ton of effort to destroy ****. That can't be it, because she HASN'T had to exert much effort before, as the film SHOWS you that. She's trembling because she's emotionally affected by what is happening. Frustrated. Curious. Whatever way you slice it, there is conflict there within Dark Phoenix.

And she's also, instead of ignoring him and what he's saying, as she was in the moments prior, registering everything he says, not just as Dark Phoenix, but deep down, as Jean. She takes less and less of him apart as he gets close to her. I.E, she is weakening. Now WHY would Dark Phoenix be weakening, I wonder?

Nevermind that the fact that Jean DOES come back essentially proves she was fighting Dark Phoenix. Or how else would she surface to begin with?

Seeing as most people despise the scene because Logan IS made into an unkillable God and is the hero again. Once again, I see no Jean in the scene until Logan says "For you" (which again as I pointed out above, I found ridiculous anyway considering his earlier comments), that is the very first time in the scene that Jean appears. The fact that you are saying its not the most clear or well handled aspect SHOWS that the scene was poorly written and poorly executed, especially if they were going for what you suggest they were.

Not being perfectly executed does not make something "poor", either in execution or the writing of it. It just means it could have been handled better. A lot of things could be handled better.

Exactly, at the end of the day Guard can go on and on about how "FREAKING obvious" his observations are, yet its FREAKING obvious to me that Jean isnt holding back in that scene, as I have pointed out, you see DP VISIBLY straining in one scene just before the majority of Logan's front chest is blown off, sorry but that isnt holding back or 'toying' with someone, and thats FREAKING obvious to me.

...

What in God's name do you think she's visibly straining to do? Blow a few pieces of skin off someone?

You did see her disintigrating entire buildings, people and vehicle in moments, right?
So now she has trouble with skin cells?

You're looking right at it and not seeing it. You're just assuming that writers who developed a particular character arc throughout the entire film, instead of presenting the payoff to that arc, just decided to SUCK at structuring a story, because that's what you want to believe. It's kind of sad, really, because the logic of the moment is fairly obvious.
 
Last edited:
It's not hard to understand. It's all because of Wolverine that Jean and everyone is "saved." If he wasn't there, evil would win. Apparently Jean is too weak to do it herself, and everyone else is useless. You might want to desperately believe that Jean letting Wolverine save her is the same as Jean being the one to do it herself, but it's not.

Of course it's the same. The principle of it is that she chooses to sacrifice her own life. Whether by alien weapon on the moon, or Wolverine's claws, or whether we saw some other person/weapon involved. She allows herself to die in comics and in the movie (in X2 as well, in fact).

You just sound bitter that it was Wolverine whom she allowed to deal the fatal blow. And it's fine to hate that it was Wolverine yet again. But that doesn't make the movie 'wrong', it just means you didn't like it. It was far more effective and dramatic to have him kill her than have her drop a car on top of herself or project a piece of rubble to impale herself on.

And you said earlier that Jean letting the machine kill her is the same as letting Wolverine kill her. It's really not. Jean activated the gun herself, and redeemed herself, because all her friends loved her too much to do it, and weren't strong enough. In the movie, Wolverine was the only reason Jean came through, because she was too weak and only he was strong enough.

In the comics, it wasn't that they weren't strong enough, it was that it wasn't possible. Cyclops brought down a million tonnes of masonry on top of her and she survived that too. In the end, she had to just take her own life in a moment where Jean was in control. It's not that dissimilar to allowing Wolverine to do it. Since we weren't going to get abandoned Skrull weapons on the moon in the film, then it was going to be something else.

As I say, if you don't like that it was Wolverine, then okay. He has been somewhat overexposed in the films, which have chosen him as a central character, much to the vexation of many comic book fans. But that doesn't mean the final scene was 'wrong' or 'weak' or 'poor writing', it just means you remain bitter - three and a half years after the movie - that it was Wolverine. It's a long time to be bitter.

You know, you and the Guard claim that it's so obvious that Jean is holding back when attacking Wolverine, and coming up with elaborate excuses as to why. Couldn't the movie have done that? No where in the movie is any of this clear, no exposition or anything. Maybe some acting from Famke as Logan is walking up to her while she's "toying with him" or struggling with herself (which one is it guys? both?) could have made things clear. But as it is, Wolverine is healing stupidly fast, and that was the key to beating her.

Babbling conversation wouldn't have worked in that scene and you know it. Are you seriously expecting to have heard 'I'm toying with you my pet, mwahahaha', 'Jean, my handy adamantium and healing powers will help me get to you'. Uh, no. Just. No.

We know that Jean is trying to fight back the Phoenix because of the character's dual behaviour earlier - calling him to the forest, then turning away, Wolverine saying she's 'still in there somewhere'. We even have that exposition from Wolvie in saying that line to Storm, and then seeing her behaviour at the forest camp. She's unpredictable because of a mental struggle going on, which is how Famke said she wanted to portray the Jean/Phoenix duality.

I've already explained what we can deduce must be happening on the island. Phoenix was toying with him and/or Jean was trying to regain control to pull back the Phoenix from obliterating him (you can see Phoenix 'straining' at one point as he gets nearer, as though held back), and Wolverine had the added advantage of adamantium and healing powers. (Lauren Shuler Donner says on the Wolverine commentary, if i recall correctly, that they had decided his healing reacts to how hard he is hit - in other words he heals more rapidly from a big attack such as Phoenix's energy wave than from a minor wound).


I guess the writers made it ambiguous on purpose. It makes Wolverine look like the awesome hero that Fox and general audiences love (which was the bases for the entire film), but also gives some illusion that there was something more going on, and those who want to defend the movie have something to cling on to. The fans can debate it, because thanks to the movie, we'll never know.

Yep, it's true they want him to be the hero, that is obvious. But that doesn't make the events of the movie to be bad writing, it just means you didn't like them or don't want to allow yourself to like them.
 
Last edited:
I've said this before. Jean was struggling with Phoenix while killing Xavier, that's why it took so long. Again, Jean is struggling with Phoenix (which is highly debatable) while attacking Logan, that's why it's taking so long in a similar process. But all of a sudden Wolverine's healing ability is exaggerated (which contradicts with the first two movies, where he took days to recover from wounds as serious) and that's the thing that allows him to survive, and not Xavier. Again, it's promoting Wolverine above both Xavier and Jean as the true hero.
 
There are a LOT of heroes in the X-Men movies, just like there are a lot of villains in them. What does "True hero" even mean anymore? Wolverine is the main character. He's been the main character in four films now. If you mean "the main character was the main character"...well...yeah. Of course he was.
 
I've said this before. Jean was struggling with Phoenix while killing Xavier, that's why it took so long. Again, Jean is struggling with Phoenix (which is highly debatable) while attacking Logan, that's why it's taking so long in a similar process. But all of a sudden Wolverine's healing ability is exaggerated (which contradicts with the first two movies, where he took days to recover from wounds as serious) and that's the thing that allows him to survive, and not Xavier. Again, it's promoting Wolverine above both Xavier and Jean as the true hero.

But the thing is, he DOES have that healing power. He WOULD have the physical advantage over the others.

(As I said above, I'm sure Lauren Shuler Donner says on the Wolverine commentary that his healing reacts to how hard he is hit; in other words he heals more rapidly from a big attack such as Phoenix's energy wave than from a minor cut, because his immune system goes into overdrive against a bigger assault).

Doesn't mean the whole scenario was perfect for me at all. There are many more things I'd liked to have seen in the movies. I'm just judging what we did see on screen, not what I'd like to have seen.
 
I don't accept Shuler's explanation on healing abilities. It's obvious they made that up after the fact. It just doesn't make sense in the context of the trilogy, and it's an example of things being made up and excuses being used for this movie.

By true hero I mean the cliche meaning of it. And that's what Wolverine was in the movie. A cliche. The veranda scene nailed that right in.
 
(As I said above, I'm sure Lauren Shuler Donner says on the Wolverine commentary that his healing reacts to how hard he is hit; in other words he heals more rapidly from a big attack such as Phoenix's energy wave than from a minor cut, because his immune system goes into overdrive against a bigger assault).

He sure reacted fairly slowly to being shot in the head in X2. Guess that wasn't a big enough injury.

I agree with Mad One that they made it up after the fact.

It's funny that she said that in the Wolverine commentary because in that film he took two bullets to the head from Agent Zero and all it did was annoy him. Compare that to the one he took in X2 that knocked him out.
 
Last edited:
He got knocked out when he was shot in the head in X2. He was unconscious, but the bullet didn't penetrate his skull. If he has any control over his healing ability, and it appears he has some...he's not going to be controlling it while unconscious. He woke up when the wound healed, indicating that he also regained consciousness at that point, or shortly before it.

Looking for a "level" of his powers seems counterproductive. He heals. Quickly sometimes, not so quickly at other times. His healing speed in X3 was fairly consistent with the other times he healed over the course of the film. Maybe he learned to control it better or something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"