• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Sequels SHOULD Singer even return to the X-Men franchise?

Sound Singer return?

  • Yes, I want things to go possibly back to the way they were.

  • No, I want to see what someone else can do with the franchise.

  • Don't really care as long as the franchise lives back up to its potential.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wasn't asking for a Storm movie with the first two flicks but I did want a stronger Storm who actually acted like she was second in command of the X-Men. If you only watched the first two X-flicks you'd think that Jean was second in command.

Except Storm wasn't second in command during X3. She was first in command and written like she was second in command.

And the leadership for all the characters was screwed up in the X-Films. Cyclops didn't feel like first in command either. But none of those leadership mix ups felt nearly as wrong as Wolverine as first in command. At least Jean co-lead X-Factor with Cyclops and whenever Cyclops was leader of the X-Men she always had a heavy influence. And besides, in the comics Storm didn't try to be a leader until Professor X gave her the position upon Cyclops' departure. The same can be said for the X-Films except swap Cyclops leaving with Cyclops being a hopeless wreck. Storm was the only senior member left besides Wolverine and Wolverine hasn't been around as long so Professor X turned to Storm.
 
Last edited:
Singer probably gave up on accents after he saw how they turned out for Storm and Rogue.

Storm was rude to Rogue, heartless about Jean, and abrasive to Wolverine. She was okay for some scenes but most of the time I just wanted her to shut up.

I doubt it. Most people weren't optimistic but I remember when the trailers came out people felt like Ratner was trying to imitate Singer's style (and that's a good thing). Some people were wary but I doubt anyone made up their minds. I was actually worried it was going to be good because it looked so epic in the trailers and I didn't want to like it because I knew Cyclops was going to die. The movie itself resolved that issue thankfully.

One thing it's easy to forget is that X-Men was the first super hero film of the modern generation. It was already taking a big risk. Most successful comic book films at the time had heroes wearing all black like Blade and the Crow. It was a time when super heroe filmshad to be wary of looking too much like super hero films and it was films like X-Men that got us to the point where we are now. The fact that you're saying the black leather means X-Men wasn't trailblazing is laughable to me because the fact X-Men was even made was trailblazing.

Making the movie wasnt trailblazing. Sure, comic movies had a bad rep for about a decade but it wasn't that big a risk to adapt the most popular comic book series in the last 20 years. Espcially since Fox only put 80 million into it (Not a huge gamble. Relatively cheap for a big summer movie) So trailblazing was the wrong word. (Plus, Blade opened the door a bit first) But it would have been nice if it looked a little more 'original'. Bad-ass black leather was pretty played out at the point. I just didn't like the costumes, is all I'm saying. Espcially wolverines. And that cape under Storms arms looked pretty silly when she wasn't "flying".

Really, as it's been said, Fox are the ones to blame. I just think Singer gets too much praise. And X3 too much hate.
 
Last edited:
Except Storm wasn't second in command during X3. She was first in command and written like she was second in command.

And the leadership for all the characters was screwed up in the X-Films. Cyclops didn't feel like first in command either. But none of those leadership mix ups felt nearly as wrong as Wolverine as first in command. At least Jean co-lead X-Factor with Cyclops and whenever Cyclops was leader of the X-Men she always had a heavy influence. And besides, in the comics Storm didn't try to be a leader until Professor X gave her the position upon Cyclops' departure. The same can be said for the X-Films except swap Cyclops leaving with Cyclops being a hopeless wreck. Storm was the only senior member left besides Wolverine and Wolverine hasn't been around as long so Professor X turned to Storm.


In X3, Xaiver told Storm he always imagined she'd take over for him some day. Other than that, I don't remember hearing too much about what roles of command people had in the x-films.

She was always (one of the) most powerful team members. Didn't really make sense that she'd take a backseat to a guy with claws. (Even Rodger Ebert was confused by that in his review of Xmen 1) Another reason she should have been saved, and therefore, more focused on, in a sequel.

At this point though Id like a re-boot. Have you ever read the Andrew Kevin Walker script?
 
Last edited:
In X3, Xaiver told Storm he always imagined she'd take over for him some day. Other than that, I don't remember hearing too much about what roles of command people had in the x-films.

She was always (one of the) most powerful team members. Didn't really make sense that she'd take a backseat to a guy with claws. (Even Rodger Ebert was confused by that in his review of Xmen 1) Another reason she should have been saved, and therefore, more focused on, in a sequel.

At this point though Id like a re-boot. Have you ever read the Andrew Kevin Walker script?

Ok but if there is a reboot, what should they do differently in the movies?
 
Ok but if there is a reboot, what should they do differently in the movies?

Id make Andrew Kevin Walkers version:
http://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/x-men_walker3.html

For some reason, the format on this file is really hard to read. You'll have to mess with the settings to read it. Maybe you can find a better copy on the internet somewhere. If your an Xmen fan, it's worth a read.

I read this before I saw Xmen 1. It was a big part of the reason I was so underwhelmed.
 
Making the movie wasnt trailblazing. Sure, comic movies had a bad rep for about a decade but it wasn't that big a risk to adapt the most popular comic book series in the last 20 years. Espcially since Fox only put 80 million into it (Not a huge gamble. Relatively cheap for a big summer movie) So trailblazing was the wrong word. (Plus, Blade opened the door a bit first) But it would have been nice if it looked a little more 'original'. Bad-ass black leather was pretty played out at the point.

Yes it is a big risk to adapt a comic book series regardless of how popular it is. X-Men is probably harder to adapt then most actually because of the nature of the source material. The fact it was cheap doesn't mean it didn't have a chance of bombing. Dragon Ball Evolution was cheaper then X-Men but it bombed massively. And Dragon Ball has a huge fanbase. Comments like this only prove my point that people seriously forget how the atmosphere was back then. X-Men was the trailblazer for the modern comic book films. It seems very reserved and squeemish about being a super hero film compared to most films now but even a super hero film with heroes in black leather was still a super hero film and that was something to see back then.

Blade may have came earlier, but it wasn't a super hero film. X-Men was really the one that really opened the door, followed by Spider-Man and it continued on from there. Those were the ones that started the new generation of super hero films.

Besides Blade was still far from the source material, so if anything Blade only proves that the forefathers of the modern super hero films had to squeeze into ttheaters as action films more then super hero films and the concern for loyalty to the source material developed more and more as time went on and new standards were set. Faithfulness to the source material is really secondary to quality. Once it was proved good comic films could be made, we started getting more faithful ones.

In X3, Xaiver told Storm he always imagined she'd take over for him some day. Other than that, I don't remember hearing too much about what roles of command people had in the x-films.

The only thing is Storm immediately brought up Scott and Professor X talked as if he only discounted Scott since Jean died. So the notion that he always thought Storm would take his place is contradicted right after it's introduced. But like you said, the talk about roles didn't appear much. Storm's talk with Xavier sure didn't matter because Wolverine became the leader of the team anyway.

At this point though Id like a re-boot. Have you ever read the Andrew Kevin Walker script?
A reboot isn't going to come for a long time.
 
Last edited:
The only thing is Storm immediately brought up Scott and Professor X talked as if he only discounted Scott since Jean died. So the notion that he always thought Storm would take his place is contradicted right after it's introduced. But like you said, the talk about roles didn't appear much. Storm's talk with Xavier sure didn't matter because Wolverine became the leader of the team anyway.

You seem terribly confused about the roles of team leader and head of the school. They're entirely different.

Storm is already the acting team leader at the start of X1, because Scott is absent and Jean is gone, making Ororo the most senior X-Men member, as we see when she leads the training room session.

Xavier had said that Scott may not only lead the team but run the school and this surprises Storm, who obviously never imagined herself to be the head of the school.

But it didn't happen. Wolverine stepped into Storm's role as leader, and Storm stepped into Xavier's role as head of the school.
 
Storm was rude to Rogue, heartless about Jean, and abrasive to Wolverine. She was okay for some scenes but most of the time I just wanted her to shut up.

She wasn't rude to Rogue, she was trying to reassure her that everything was okay, that she shouldn't try to change what she was. You need to watch that scene again. You're talking like she punched her across the room or something. Storm was trying to stop Rogue thinking about the cure because Storm herself is, by this film, a character more proud of what she is

I doubt it. Most people weren't optimistic but I remember when the trailers came out people felt like Ratner was trying to imitate Singer's style (and that's a good thing). Some people were wary but I doubt anyone made up their minds. I was actually worried it was going to be good because it looked so epic in the trailers and I didn't want to like it because I knew Cyclops was going to die. The movie itself resolved that issue thankfully.

You were worried it was going to be good? You didn't want to like it? That just about says it all. Biased much?
 
She wasn't rude to Rogue, she was trying to reassure her that everything was okay, that she shouldn't try to change what she was. You need to watch that scene again. You're talking like she punched her across the room or something. Storm was trying to stop Rogue thinking about the cure because Storm herself is, by this film, a character more proud of what she is



You were worried it was going to be good? You didn't want to like it? That just about says it all. Biased much?


And he knew Cyclops would die. I actually think a lot of people hate X3 because of all the deaths. I agree, I don't like the random killing of characters in the comics, let alone the movies, but I didn't take them seriously. None of them looked like "permenant deaths" in X3 to me.
 
ou were worried it was going to be good? You didn't want to like it? That just about says it all. Biased much?

I think you missed the part that I said I was worried about it being good because I thought it looked good. I also was upset about X2 when I heard that Cyclops wasn't in it much. It's still my favorite X-Film. Not to mention a part of me still was the type that wished we were getting X-Films closer to the comics. I couldn't help liking X2 because it felt so well made but X3 didn't have that same effect because overall I find it to be mediocre. I actually despise it for what it does to some of my favorite characters but I wouldn't rate it much lower then mediocre. It's actually better then pretty much all of Fox's other super hero non X-films.

I was fairly certain the movie was going to objectively good despite the fact Cyclops died. I'll just point out I very much wanted to like X-Men Origins: Wolverine. I saw Wolverine was making better use of Cyclops and from a fanboy perspective I like that but from a film perspective I thought it was a really bad movie when I finally got to see it. The Cyclops, Emma, Gambit, etc. cameos got me giddy but that didn't stop me from realizing the movie was pretty awful. I actually think X-Men Origins: Wolverine is way worse then X3 even though I wanted to like it and I didn't want to like X3. I think X3 is objectively mediocre but Wolverine is objectively bad. I have fanboy biases but when it comes down to it I try not to judge a good film as bad or a bad film as good just because it doesn't appeal to my fanboy urges.
 
Last edited:
She wasn't a complete waste in X-MEN and X2. She had a few nice moments, with Senator Kelly in X-MEN, and with Nightcrawler in X2, and some decent action beats, but they got Storm a lot more right in X3: Instead of just hating humans, or fearing them (both valid issues to bring up, mind you), she was proud of her mutant nature, and of mutants in general.
I never liked that scene with Sentator Kelly. I wasn't feeling Halle Berry's performance in that scene...at all.
 
I don't think anyone was. It's a well written scene, though.
 
BLADE was the first mostly serious superhero film in a while, but X-MEN was definitely trailblazing as far as what could be done with a comic book film, in terms of exploration of themes and social concepts. Very few comic films had been taken seriously, and certainly none as seriously as X-MEN was. Remember, X-MEN came before SPIDER-MAN, BATMAN BEGINS, etc. I agree...people do forget the atmosphere and attitude toward comic book movies back then.

I don't feel like Storm was first or second in command. She was just more of a leader than she was in the previous two films, period.

It's never stated or shown that Wolverine is "the leader" of the X-Men in X3. He just displays leadership qualities at key moments. And in the final battle, that makes perfece sense. He's a former soldier type, after all.

There's also nothing concrete that suggests Xavier thinks Cyclops will never recover. Storm is a backup, and he's clearly referring to the school and the team, but the capacity is vague.

As far as rebooting: I liked a lot of what Andrew Kevin Walker did with the X-Men. I wrote a YOUNG X-MEN reboot script a few years back that I hope we get something similar to in FIRST CLASS. Bits of ULTIMATE X-MEN and early X-Men lore, etc. It was a prequel of sorts of the movie franchise, featured a young Scott, Jean, Storm, and Hank McCoy working with Xavier at the start of the school. It detailed Erik and Charles breaking point, and Magneto's first real attack against humanity, with Scarlet Witch, Quicksilver, and The Blob as an early Brotherhood, and the beginnings of the Sentinel Program, which Magneto and the others destroyed. It introduced a lot of the "character elements" we see later on in the films, "Phoenix", Scott's leadership role, Storm's acceptance of others and embracing her mutancy, etc. It was a much smaller concept, but still had some big action. I wish I could find that stuff. Blast.
 
Last edited:
I think you missed the part that I said I was worried about it being good because I thought it looked good.

I still don't get it though. You were worried it would be good because it looked good?

And I heard Cyclops limited role (and maybe his death) was a result of Bryan Singer taking him for Superman Returns. So it's kinda his fault in a way, no?
Ridiculous too when you consider just about anyone could have played Lois Lanes' new boyfriend.

I agree about Origins: Wolverine. Just terrible.

Maybe X3 is mediocre. But I always felt the first one was mediocre too. I enjoyed 3 much better. Better action, better script. Just my opinion obviously.
 
I still don't get it though. You were worried it would be good because it looked good?

And I heard Cyclops limited role (and maybe his death) was a result of Bryan Singer taking him for Superman Returns. So it's kinda his fault in a way, no?
Ridiculous too when you consider just about anyone could have played Lois Lanes' new boyfriend.

I agree about Origins: Wolverine. Just terrible.

Maybe X3 is mediocre. But I always felt the first one was mediocre too. I enjoyed 3 much better. Better action, better script. Just my opinion obviously.

That's what always got on my nerves too. That role was such a waste even though I understand that it was to show that Lois had moved on. He was just there to be there for that one and only reason. Technically, they could have given him no lines and it wouldn't have made a difference.
 
I never liked that scene with Sentator Kelly. I wasn't feeling Halle Berry's performance in that scene...at all.


Something about how she runs aways seemed really phoney. Like there was a wierd cut or something right after the Senator liquifies.
 
I still don't get it though. You were worried it would be good because it looked good?

I didn't want to like it for fanboyish reasons but from an impartial view the trailers made the movie look really good. The fanboy in me didn't want to like it just like fanboy in me wanted to like Wolverine. As with Wolverine, the fanboy in me didn't make the final decision.

And I heard Cyclops limited role (and maybe his death) was a result of Bryan Singer taking him for Superman Returns. So it's kinda his fault in a way, no?
Ridiculous too when you consider just about anyone could have played Lois Lanes' new boyfriend.
I agree. I blame X3's mediocrity very heavily on Singer as well as Fox. Singer annoys me especially because if he was going to not make X3 he could have at least made a Superman film that wasn't a remake of the original Superman movie with Super Stalker dead beat dad added in. At least we have some kind of X-Men films in the works but Singer put a bullet into the head of an already wounded film franchise.

Good point about Lois' boyfriend. Singer taking Marsden really was pointless. Maybe Singer thinks hes just the definite actor for playing third wheels in love triangles.
 
I think the franchise just needs a different type of treatment now that superhero movies are becoming so common-place. I would like to see the x-men out of their toned-down leather and in full blown Astonishing costumes. I think it could really work if the movies had something of the look of Watchmen but just taking itself less seriously and without slow-motion every two seconds.
 
I agree, but I don't think Fox is going to be the studio that is going to make such a change. Nor are they going to let go of the franchise until it stops making them money. Maybe they might go a different way with First Class but I'm willing to bet if it does get made it'll be more of the same.
 
I didn't want to like it for fanboyish reasons but from an impartial view the trailers made the movie look really good. The fanboy in me didn't want to like it just like fanboy in me wanted to like Wolverine. As with Wolverine, the fanboy in me didn't make the final decision.

I agree. I blame X3's mediocrity very heavily on Singer as well as Fox. Singer annoys me especially because if he was going to not make X3 he could have at least made a Superman film that wasn't a remake of the original Superman movie with Super Stalker dead beat dad added in. At least we have some kind of X-Men films in the works but Singer put a bullet into the head of an already wounded film franchise.

Good point about Lois' boyfriend. Singer taking Marsden really was pointless. Maybe Singer thinks hes just the definite actor for playing third wheels in love triangles.

Totally. Superman came off downright creepy in that movie. And I like Kevin Spacey, but I think he overplayed the character. Gene hackman was kind of a goofy Luther. Evil, but funny. When they tried to make him a serious villian, you start to see his character didn't have much motivation to hate superman in the first place. ('He flies around and doesn't share his powers?' What does that mean?) And that third act went on WAY too long. Frankly, I thought the first 2 X films weakened significantly in their 3rd acts. Espcecially the second one.
 
how is anybody blaming singer for x3 fox could of been smart and let signer do a movie in between and wait for him

did WB get a new director when Nolan did the prestige or inception? nope

wb could of got a new director and recasted Alfred since Nolan has him in inception
 
Actually, as I have pointed out, but you have apparently ignored, yes, he did heal that fast at points in previous films, and in X3. His hand scars, for instance, heal almost INSTANTLY in all four films.

But those are minor scars, there is a big difference between that and half the majority of the front portion of your body blow away, and I have watched all of these movies countless times and he never heals as fast as at the end of X3, never.

And watch how fast he heals after getting hit in the head in the Danger Room in X3.

The movie is on telly right now, and no, he doesnt heal instantly like at the end of X3, there is a small delay, which coincides with the previous movies.

I just went through X-MEN and X2 and watched his healing scenes yesterday. He heals slower when he's groggy or unconscious, but otherwise, his healing rate, while amped up a bit at the end of X3, is pretty consistent with previous films with a reasonable variance.

The fact that you admit it is 'amped up a bit' simply proves my point. The rest of X3 is pretty consistant with his healing factor, I will readily admit that, but the end scene, na, just isnt consistent at all.



Not going to go with this elementary school logic.

Their previous films and what they've done after X3 have no actual bearing on X3 as an individual work.

IMO it does, a poor writer is a poor writer, and nothing they have done, including, in fact i'd go so far as too say especially X3, proves this.

You're not judging what you've been presented on the screen at all, because you're clearly ignoring the sizeable difference in intensity between Dark Phoenix's attacks on Logan...and her attacks on everything else.

I've gone into detail about why I believe what I believe, while your arguments against my (and others now) reasoning for why Logan isn't just BLOWN AWAY in that scene amounts to something along the lines of "Nuh uh!"

Thats a bit of a childish statement IMO, I have explained why I believe she isnt holding back and said the same thing countless times, but every time, you have just tried to force me into thinking what YOU think. It ISNT going to happen get over it, you see one thing, I see something completely different.

Your excuse is that we arent judging the movie properly because we dislike it? Thats ridiculous and arrogant in and of itself, there are plenty of movies I dislike, but, like X3, I always point out what they did well in my reviews of them. But go ahead, believe we cant put logic together because we dislike a movie, I personally think thats absolutely ridiculous.

Fair enough. Don't look for it. Don't believe/buy it. Don't enjoy the element that is in the movie, and was clearly meant to be in the movie.

Obviously it wasnt clearly meant to be in the movie, as I pointed out but you chose to ignore again, I know people who liked the movie who see no conflict in Pheonix in this scene, but you'll probably ignore this again.



She asks because he's risking his life, period. Not because he's risking his life against all she has. She is not going at him with all she has. That is a silly statement on so many levels. We've SEEN what she's capable of, not only earlier in the film, but at the SAME TIME she's attacking Wolverine, and what she's throwing at him is barely a FRACTION of that power potential.

We have seen what she was capable of, and never in the movie was it shown, or even suggested, that she could wreak havoc on a whole area while not effecting one little tiny portion of it, look at the house scene, she is focused solely on Xavier in that scene, yet everything else in the immediate vicinity is effected, are you asking do believe she suddenly learned this a few days after the house scene?

EDIT: Just want to add after watching the scene again that you physically see power coming FROM HER in the scene as well and towards Logan, this is CLEARLY shown in the scene so I very much doubt she isnt going full tilt at Logan.

I mean, I get that you don't like it, and don't see conflict and whatnot, but I really don't see how you can be in denial about this very simple and rather clear visual element of the film (her power levels). I mean, you really think that despite the fact that she can blow buildings to pieces in seconds, that "trying her damdnest" is blowing a few inches of skin of Logan a couple of times?

And just because a lot of people didn't bother to assess the scene logically doesn't mean it doesn't have logical components. The "legions" of fans who hate X3 on principle don't impress me. People who discuss things in depth, with some semblance of logic impress me.

As if we havent gone into this in depth enough, I have explained to you what I see in the movie, the only evidence we have is what the moie presents us, and sorry, I see no conflict, I see a DP pissed off because she cant blow him away despite trying her hardest, and ill say it again for the 50th time, you see her visibly straining to blow him away at one point, funnily enough just before she comes closest to doing so, thats all the evidence I need to make my point, but again, you'll just ignore it.



I'm sorry (see, I can do that too, what are we apologizing for?), but my explanation of what a Deux Ex Machina is, and my assessment that his powers are not one since they've been there from the beginning and didn't just suddenly appear, and me saying what I think I see in her performance reeks of excuses?

What am I excusing, exactly?

How is me telling you what I think I see an "excuse" for anything in context?

How would an "excuse" even fit the context of the part you quoted me saying?

Do you know what an excuse is, and the context such a concept is used in?

Yes, throwing out childish insults like this is really going to help your argument, but keep it up, as you just seem more and more like a spoilt person who is upset because people dont like a movie you do.
 
Last edited:
OK folks, the days of endless bickering over X3 have long past. Let's discuss the film without going after others for liking it or disliking it.
 
how is anybody blaming singer for x3 fox could of been smart and let signer do a movie in between and wait for him

did WB get a new director when Nolan did the prestige or inception? nope

wb could of got a new director and recasted Alfred since Nolan has him in inception
Singer could have been less presumptuous and tried to make an arrangement with Fox beforehand. And like it was said, he took Marsden with him for no real good reason so Cyclops' role is largely his fault. Plus Singer ran off to work on another franchise while Nolan simply wanted a break from Batman with both of his two films. Inception is even being produced by Warner Bros so they're getting money from Nolan either way. Singer was running off to a rival company.

I think both sides dropped the ball, but Fox came out of it better then Singer did. Singer lost two franchises and now he has to come crawling back to Fox. Fox on the other hand is still making money off X-Films.
 
how is anybody blaming singer for x3 fox could of been smart and let signer do a movie in between and wait for him

did WB get a new director when Nolan did the prestige or inception? nope

wb could of got a new director and recasted Alfred since Nolan has him in inception


Honestly, any director who thinks Superman is cooler than the X-Men, doesn't deserve to be working on the X-Men. Superman over Xmen? No offense to Supes but that's just blasphemy. He shouldnt be rewarded.
Think outside the box, people. Singers not the only good director in Hollywood. He's not even that good. Maybe they could find a fan. Someone who actually appreciates and respects the history. Like Sam Raimi. But not like Mark Steven Johnson.
I love Del Toros' Blade 2. I think he'd do wonders with mutants. Sadly it seems he's fallen in with the hellboy people. But you never know...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"