"Smaller" Avengers sequel?

Discussion in 'The Avengers Sequels' started by MessiahDecoy123, Mar 9, 2012.

?

Should the Avengers sequel have a smaller feel?

  1. Yes, it should be smaller

  2. No, keep it epic

  3. I'm not sure what "smaller" means

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. MessiahDecoy123

    MessiahDecoy123 Psychological Anarchist

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    22,464
    Likes Received:
    0
    #1
  2. R_Hythlodeus

    R_Hythlodeus Nerd Supreme

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    8,387
    Likes Received:
    0
    I voted for yes. I#m more than looking forward to a sequel with a more personal approach. You can't top an alien invasion anyway and if you don't have to focus on adding action scenes every ten minutes, you can focus on a better plot instead.
     
    #2
  3. Thundercrack85

    Thundercrack85 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    21,675
    Likes Received:
    1
    Isn't it bad luck to talk about a sequel before your movie comes out?
     
    #3
  4. hopefuldreamer

    hopefuldreamer Clark Kent > Superman

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,849
    Likes Received:
    0
    I personally love what he said.

    It's not that he's saying for the sequel there will be no action, and everyone will just talk. Of course there will still be epic action sequences.

    He's just saying that the worst way to approach a sequel to something this big is to think 'How can I do something bigger' cause if you do that you'll ultimately loose sight of your characters and their story.

    And Joss treats characters like people. In all of his tv shows he's proven that where he takes his characters isn't where he thinks the public want to see them go... It's where they would naturally go.

    And because of that, the stories are strong, believable and full of heart.

    Think of it this way.

    When most people think 'bigger', they are thinking of bigger stunts and sfx.

    Joss thinks bigger as in more 'drama'. More emotion. If the audience actually really CARES about these guys and what their going through... That's bigger than those 'ooohhh' moments when someone blows something up.

    I mean the 'biggest' moments in Buffy weren't the one's where something visually spectacular happened. They were the huge emotional moments.
     
    #4
  5. BigThor

    BigThor God of Thunder

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    18,256
    Likes Received:
    26
    I liked the fact that Joss said Avengers 2 is going to be smaller and more personal, because I think he means he gone to spend more time with the characters on a more in depth level.

    Besides, when I first read that interview I immediately thought about Ultron being the perfect villain for a more personal villain.
     
    #5
  6. DOOZlovesBOOZ

    DOOZlovesBOOZ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2012
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    0
    If smaller means introducing ultron and i get too see hank and jan, then i am all in. Although IMO i really think they might have to change hank to GIANT man only, so wasp's shrinkage has some significance. That wouldn't bother me cuz to me the importance of having hank in a movie is to HAVE anti-social/labrat hank in it, not necessarily his superpowers.
     
    #6
  7. MessiahDecoy123

    MessiahDecoy123 Psychological Anarchist

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    22,464
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually that kind of psychological symbolism would be refreshing in an action movie.

    I wouldn't want Ang Lee Hulk level ambiguity but a more direct approach where everyone can appreciate the symbolism would be welcomed.
     
    #7
  8. BigThor

    BigThor God of Thunder

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    18,256
    Likes Received:
    26
    Yeah you're right about Wasp's shrinking needing to be unique,besides I'm more of a fan of Hank's Giant Man persona anway.
     
    #8
  9. DOOZlovesBOOZ

    DOOZlovesBOOZ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2012
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh not to that level, but you have to delve into that part of the character or what is the use of having him in the avengers, it is who hank is.


    Me too plus the whole ant world on film just doesn't seem like it would work, but who am i to say that :yay: I mean there were people who thought Thor's world wouldn't work but now look who's villain is prominently in the avengers. I still think a man riding insects is pushing the GA imagination and may detract from the sequel.
     
    #9
  10. MessiahDecoy123

    MessiahDecoy123 Psychological Anarchist

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    22,464
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think you'll lose alot of people if you show a guy in a fishbowl helmet weaing tights riding a flying ant to fight evil. You can only take the general audience so far before they say "screw this nerd crap".

    and for the record I always knew Thor could work in a movie.
     
    #10
  11. DrCosmic

    DrCosmic Professor of Power

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    Messages:
    8,664
    Likes Received:
    1
    Did you know how dramatically they were going to change his storyline in order to make it work?

    I thought about this too. An earth-based robot with access to their personal data is pretty awesome in terms of ability to really get into these characters personal lives. As long as he's invented by Pym, I have no problem if Pym is still stuck in the 60s.
     
    #11
  12. Franklin Richards

    Franklin Richards Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2002
    Messages:
    23,029
    Likes Received:
    0
    Smaller doesn't mean less action. When the Masters of Evil invaded the Mansion and nearly killed Hercules... tortured Jarvis... and pretty much destroyed the house, THAT was a smaller story in scope. No invasions. No taking over the world.

    Just one big home invasion.


    :cap: :cap: :cap:
     
    #12
  13. BigThor

    BigThor God of Thunder

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    18,256
    Likes Received:
    26
    Exactly, it just means action on a smaller more personal scale not "small" as in less fight scenes.
     
    #13
  14. MarvelKnight

    MarvelKnight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,605
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yep, I agree. I like that he said it would be 'what happens next' as in a natural progression of events. Having a whacked out god with an alien horde at his disposal is pretty epic for a first time out.

    Having three cosmic/god-like enemies in a row lining up to take over earth.. it's almost not believable, so Smaller in scope, to me, lends itself to being a more home-grown threat.

    One who knows the Avengers in and out, almost better than themselves, where they can not only attack them each physically but mentally as well which is pretty personal.

    I say let him do whatever he feels! I trust Whedon to deliver
     
    #14
  15. BigThor

    BigThor God of Thunder

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    18,256
    Likes Received:
    26
    Once again that sounds a lot like my main man Ultron. :woot:
     
    #15
  16. MarvelKnight

    MarvelKnight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,605
    Likes Received:
    0
    ^Yep. I've been all for Ultron since day 1.
     
    #16
  17. BigThor

    BigThor God of Thunder

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    18,256
    Likes Received:
    26
    ^ Same here, I knew he wasn't going to be in the first film but I've been wanting to see him in an Avengers film forever.
     
    #17
  18. Chewy

    Chewy REDACTED

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    13,000
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think you're confusing "smaller" with "small"
     
    #18
  19. marcvader

    marcvader Lurker #1

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    13,124
    Likes Received:
    7
    He's speaking in code guys! The Pyms are coming to the bug screen, I meant big screen! ;)
     
    #19
  20. MessiahDecoy123

    MessiahDecoy123 Psychological Anarchist

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    22,464
    Likes Received:
    0
    If it is smaller then it will be small in comparison to the first movie.

    and if they weren't planning something noticeably smaller, why would they bring it up?
     
    #20
  21. cherokeesam

    cherokeesam SHIELD Director Coulson

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    12,044
    Likes Received:
    0

    To show that they have no intention of trying to outdo themselves in the sequel. And that's a good thing. The Michael Bay/Gore Verbinski/Brett Ratner School of Blockbuster Sequelology has taught a lot of fans the unhealthy myth that sequels have to necessarily be bigger than their predecessors, which leads to increasingly bloated bombastic bull**** that ultimately turns off even the die-hard fans.

    The better approach appears in sequels like The Temple of Doom, The Empire Strikes Back, and even X2: X-Men United, where directors chose not to one-up themselves and instead focus on a more personal, less epic story that concentrates on developing the main characters instead of just throwing them into an even bigger battle with even bigger sfx and fireworks.
     
    #21
  22. BigThor

    BigThor God of Thunder

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    18,256
    Likes Received:
    26
    Yesssssssss that would be great!!!!
     
    #22
  23. Dark Raven

    Dark Raven The Gal from Themyscira

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    47,221
    Likes Received:
    266
    That's what I would like. Ultron as the villain would be a smaller Avengers sequel because it's not as grand in scale as an all-out alien invasion. However, Ultron would still be epic and ought to be the way they go with the 2nd movie.
     
    #23
  24. Lord

    Lord All Mighty

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    15,505
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yeah, i tought the exact same thing :woot:
    And i hope he's used
     
    #24
  25. BigThor

    BigThor God of Thunder

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    18,256
    Likes Received:
    26
    I'm glad we're all on the same page here. :up:

    :woot: :woot: :woot:
     
    #25

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"