I'll never understand that. To this day I can't say for sure which Joker version I prefer (not to mention film). Ledger was fresh and entertaining, but Nicholson was delightful, too, not to mention more faithful to the source. And I'm in absolutely no hurry to label one as better, I'm just satisfied I can enjoy both of their performances.
You'd be wrong. Jack was the top fave in the role for years. From studio execs to Hollywood peers, they thought it was the role born for him. I believe his nickname was also "Jack the Joker" because of how similar his persona and look was to the comic book character. Hell, even Bob Kane personally recommended Jack for the role.I think Jack wasn't similar to the joker until artist began drawing Joker like Jack.
![]()
It was more of Joker doing the philosophical talking. Bats was more or less the grunt, ironically.I'd like to add that Mr Ledger also benefitted from a fantastic screenplay which was not really the case for B89. As a batfan I always dreamt of seeing a scene with The Joker and Batman just sitting in front of each other talking philosophical and thanks to the Nolans my wish was granted.
What's so outdated about it? It's simple and can hardly be relegated to a particular "era".Do/can we really still call Joker "Mr. J"? For some reason, that nickname sounds outdated now.
I recommend "the last detail" and " The passenger" and many others (usually before 1980) for some of Nicholson more subtle work.
I think Jack wasn't similar to the joker until artist began drawing Joker like Jack.
![]()
I agree, he was fantastic in Schmidt. He was also more subtle in the movies he did with Sean Penn "The crossing guard" and "the pledge".About Schmidt, I find to be his best recent work. I just didn't see Jack, less so the world-weary character of Warren, and there wasn't any moment of him tearing up the scenery
Back on topic, damn, where is that interview??![]()
Do/can we really still call Joker "Mr. J"? For some reason, that nickname sounds outdated now.
Im glad to see some people can still appreciate other interpretations no matter how good the new fresh ones are!
What's so outdated about it? It's simple and can hardly be relegated to a particular "era".
Both Joker's were awesome in their own way. Both of them looked awesome, acted great, and had some badass one liners. Wouldn't it be trippy if 20 years from now Heath's daughter Matilda played Harley Quinn in a new Batman movie?
Im glad to see some people can still appreciate other interpretations no matter how good the new fresh ones are!
Im glad to see some people can still appreciate other interpretations no matter how good the new fresh ones are!
Maybe it's just me... but I can see a little Nicholson influence in Ledger's portrayal.
It's subtle but it's there... and Jack's right... Heath just kind of naturally took it to 'the next level'.
Cool, I remember reading this great quote, thanks for reposting it.Had Ledger not upped the ante he would've failed he definitely had to and he succeeded. I know Ledger digged Nicholson's performance but the only real constant similarities I see is in terms of the energy and theatricality which is is natural given the character they're portraying I mean Romero also had that. But I see more than just the comic book Joker in Ledger's performance I see a lot of the conventional traits of cinematic sociopaths (Ie: Alex De Large, Travis Bickle) mixed with modern age Joker. Where as with Nicholson I just really see golden through bronze age comic book Joker more than anything else.
Heath Ledger on Jack Nicholson
"Im not going for the same thing he went for. That would be stupid. It is also two very different directors with different styles. Tim Burton did a more fantastical kind of thing and Chris Nolan is doing nitty gritty handheld realism. I love what [Jack] did and that is part of why I want to do that role. I remember seeing it and thinking how much fun it would be to put on that mask and attempt to do something along those lines. But it would obviously be murder if I tried to imitate what he did."