"So You Think You Can Mod?"--A Hype Reality Show!

The answer is simple.

Ban Hypester B without any warning and when he or she logs on, it will give no description as to why they were banned.

And then delete the thread that caused the issue.

Also, I would make no mention that it was I who did that, leaving the non-moderators oblivious to any goings on.
Hypster B is the gay one. Unless....
 
When's the contest end and who is the judge?
 
Probably both. Hypester A is obviously against gays, but Hypester B could be over reacting. Either way, Hypester A should calm down about constantly mentioning his view on gays and such. Not every thread here has to mention gays, so it would be off topic. And I am sure Hypester B isn't in threads about gays all the time, so it would have to be off topic in many occasions.

good point...
 
When's the contest end and who is the judge?

There are several more scenarios on the way, so it's not going to end for awhile. And everyone is the judge...of everyone else's character.

REMINDER: As I made clear in the first post, keep the spamming out of here. Stay on topic please.

You know who you are. :mad:
 
Is just me or have some of my posts been deleted
 
There are several more scenarios on the way, so it's not going to end for awhile. And everyone is the judge...of everyone else's character.

REMINDER: As I made clear in the first poast, keep the spamming out of here. Stay on topic please.

I see my bad
 
Also, if you answer a question incorrectly, you're banned. That's what I heard behind the scenes, anyway.
 
There are several more scenarios on the way, so it's not going to end for awhile. And everyone is the judge...of everyone else's character.

REMINDER: As I made clear in the first post, keep the spamming out of here. Stay on topic please.

You know who you are. :mad:

:csad:
 
As I mentioned, no warning but small PM asking to tone down gay jokes by request, and tell them they are on notice.....let B know that there is no strong evidence to take any action but you will follow the situation as much as possible, but to PM him if A continues with gay taunts....if there is evidence after you told him to tone down, then give A is given a warning and told the next time they will be given a probationary ban....

An official warning, or simply a warning by PM?
 
I did the same thing, so we are both ******ed. :yay: :word:

See that would result in a banning.

Causing trouble, that's a banning.

Talking back, that's a banning.

Looking me cock eyed, oh that's a banning.
 
Also remember, as a Global Mod, you have about 5 OTHER situations going on like this one....on any given day.....if your movie has opened that you mod the board for, then you have that to monitor as well....:yay:
 
See that would result in a banning.

Causing trouble, that's a banning.

Talking back, that's a banning.

Looking me cock eyed, oh that's a banning.
Wow. And I called you ******ed so that's like 20X looking you cockeyed. :wow:
 
Also remember, as a Global Mod, you have about 5 OTHER situations going on like this one....on any given day.....if your movie has opened that you mod the board for, then you have that to monitor as well....:yay:


Get out the bannin' button and go to town
 
Scenario #2

Posting pornography on public boards is condemned by the site's rules. However, Hypester B is now claiming that Hypester A is sending him heterosexually-themed porn via PM. Please note that no derrogatory comments are included, but it is a known fact that Hypester A hates gay individuals. Hypester B feels that the harrassment has elevated to a new level and blames you--the moderator--for only choosing to "monitor" the situation from Scenario 1.

How would you mediate the conflict?

KEY NOTE: According to the site's rules, PMs (private messages) are inadmissable for judgement and should not be posted publicly. However, Hypester B has forwarded you the PMs containing porn for proof.
 
There's nothing wrong with giving "A" a warning, then its up to "A" what happens from then on out.
 
Wait....who won Scenario 1!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????????
 
i was going to do a Hype Apprentice game and it was shot down. it would have been much better than this
 
Scenario #2

Posting pornography on public boards is condemned by the site's rules. However, Hypester B is now claiming that Hypester A is sending him heterosexually-themed porn via PM. Please note that no derrogatory comments are included, but it is a known fact that Hypester A hates gay individuals. Hypester B feels that the harrassment has elevated to a new level and blames you--the moderator--for only choosing to "monitor" the situation from Scenario 1.

How would you mediate the conflict?

KEY NOTE: According to the site's rules, PMs (private messages) are inadmissable for judgement and should not be posted publicly. However, Hypester B has forwarded you the PMs containing porn for proof.
Ok, so who the hell are poster A and B here? Cause thats 2 scenario's straight with the same dudes and the same problem.
 
Scenario #2

Posting pornography on public boards is condemned by the site's rules. However, Hypester B is now claiming that Hypester A is sending him heterosexually-themed porn via PM. Please note that no derrogatory comments are included, but it is a known fact that Hypester A hates gay individuals. Hypester B feels that the harrassment has elevated to a new level and blames you--the moderator--for only choosing to "monitor" the situation from Scenario 1.

How would you mediate the conflict?

KEY NOTE: According to the site's rules, PMs (private messages) are inadmissable for judgement and should not be posted publicly. However, Hypester B has forwarded you the PMs containing porn for proof.

"A" should be put on probation, no one deserves that kind of treatment, but probation first, since it is in a pm.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"