Homecoming "Spider-Man Summit" Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
A Lego Spider-Man movie aimed at kids could work if those same creative parties from the first Lego movie were involved. DC characters shouldn’t be having all the Lego movie fun.

Spider-Man appearing in Civil War? Hey, now. My pitch would be to make it the Miles Morales version. Chris Rock can play the father (with hair this time.) Eva Mendez can play the mother. Mike Epps can be the uncle. Mr. Garfield's a cool actor but let him stay in his own trilogy zone.
I’m also leery of the Sony producers (Arad, et al.) getting creative input on any Spider-Man-featured MCU films (i.e., character choices, plot points, etc.). Of course now that the email hacking has been publicized? That might derail things. Oh, well.
 
Does the E-Mail not debunk direct Marvel connections like Civil War? I don't see Raimi directing 3 as Webb was confirmed to return. Raimi could return as an executive producer like in Evil Dead as the E-Mail apparantly did not specifically say they wanted him to direct.
 
Raimi coming back is a huge marketing tactic, IMO. Like Nolan involved with MOS.

"From the director that brought you the two "good" Spider-Man films".
 
Does the E-Mail not debunk direct Marvel connections like Civil War? I don't see Raimi directing 3 as Webb was confirmed to return. Raimi could return as an executive producer like in Evil Dead as the E-Mail apparantly did not specifically say they wanted him to direct.

"Superman: Man of Steel" was to follow up Superman Returns with Singer confirmed to direct and Routh confirmed to return.

Edward Norton was confirmed to have been signed for the Avengers, originally as a possible antagonist according to the commentary.

Sam Raimi was confirmed to direct Spider-Man 4, while Maguire and Dunst were signed for 4-6.

My point is a Studio can write contracts, secure dates, do whatever it is they must to ensure they have options, but they by no means have to honor any decisions made prior to shooting or even after in some cases.
 
"Superman: Man of Steel" was to follow up Superman Returns with Singer confirmed to direct and Routh confirmed to return.

Edward Norton was confirmed to have been signed for the Avengers, originally as a possible antagonist according to the commentary.

Sam Raimi was confirmed to direct Spider-Man 4, while Maguire and Dunst were signed for 4-6.

My point is a Studio can write contracts, secure dates, do whatever it is they must to ensure they have options, but they by no means have to honor any decisions made prior to shooting or even after in some cases.
So you're saying there's still hope for our Aunt May spinoff?
 
"Superman: Man of Steel" was to follow up Superman Returns with Singer confirmed to direct and Routh confirmed to return.

Edward Norton was confirmed to have been signed for the Avengers, originally as a possible antagonist according to the commentary.

Sam Raimi was confirmed to direct Spider-Man 4, while Maguire and Dunst were signed for 4-6.

My point is a Studio can write contracts, secure dates, do whatever it is they must to ensure they have options, but they by no means have to honor any decisions made prior to shooting or even after in some cases.

I'm not saying Webb will no doubt come back, I was just pointing out that it was confirmed twice, once in April (though it said he signed a contract) and in July he was confirmed to return to direct. When Orci left for Star Trek 3 they just said it. I'm just saying as far as we know Webb will direct in May 2018, which is official Sony news and not "journalists" like Devin Frachi, CBM "scoop" or my mate's uncle's nephew's cat who works at Sony and told me...
 
So you're saying there's still hope for our Aunt May spinoff?

Maybe Sony can make Aunt May either a Men In Black Agent or Jump Street cop in that cross over
 
Shame that Marvel chose to decline to share Spider-Man. They could've pleased their fans but chose not to.

from comments many here are more marvel studios fans than spider-man fan.

People dismiss me due to being more classic Spider-man fan but i don't like idea of spider-man in civil war or avengers.Sorry but spider-man is solo hero and he needs to remain that way.

I don't even think sinister six film is good idea and i like the idea of reboot
even less.hard or soft reboot the end result is same for me I have no intrest in another spider-man reboot.

If we go with the marvel has film all maped out till 2028 claims then apart from cameos in civil war and avengers sequels there isn't any place.

X-Men and SPider-man were always the marvel characters i cared about and
batman was DC character i cared about.

Amazing SPider-man 2 still managed to do 700 million ww.Imagine what a better received film could do.Sony needs to worry about making a good spider-man film not what marvel studios is doing.

Some say spider-man should do more.Well thor the dark world doing more ww than The Wolverine didn't ruin X-Men.

Marc Webb isn't directing S6.Kurtzman & Orci aren't writing it.Drew Goddard is.Even though i am not wild about it that's a big difference in quality.

As for rami returning who knows.
 
Honestly think Webb won't return.
 
Maybe Sony can make Aunt May either a Men In Black Agent or Jump Street cop in that cross over
Plot Twist: She's Will Smith's biological mom.
 
I'm not saying Webb will no doubt come back, I was just pointing out that it was confirmed twice, once in April (though it said he signed a contract) and in July he was confirmed to return to direct. When Orci left for Star Trek 3 they just said it. I'm just saying as far as we know Webb will direct in May 2018, which is official Sony news and not "journalists" like Devin Frachi, CBM "scoop" or my mate's uncle's nephew's cat who works at Sony and told me...

April was before the film performed 300 mil under projection. Contracts mean the studio would like them to return and they are offering you a deal to return. Terrence howard was signed and contracted for Iron Man 2, but because he was getting a cut in pay they recast. Sony can easily do the same. Not to mention movies like Ant-Man with Edgar Wright, X3 with Singer, Vaughn, and finally Rattner, Thor 2 with Alan Taylor and the other director I can't remember, Tim Burton with Batman Forever, etc. Most likely he'll be given a producer credit if the movie is even made.
 
Shame that Marvel chose to decline to share Spider-Man. They could've pleased their fans but chose not to.

If that's not baiting then I don't know what is.

You'd turn down an offer to have Sony make movies at your expense with their recent quality control too. Marvel started the talks, Sony were crappy about it as per usual, talks ended.
 
^^ same

All I want from the event is this (posted in other thread too):

spidurmanjul1again_zps5c9c164e.png

:waa: Don't play with my feelings like that :(
 
I like to think Marvel has a script ready to go for all their properties not currently in house and are just waiting on the rights to revert to start up production
 
Well, this is happening in January and Marvel is prepping "Welcome Home" variant covers for January. Coincidence?
 
What?! Pics or didn't happen!!!
 
It's a load of covers of Marvel characters lined up for something, labelled 'Welcome Home' covers

Probably nothing, but very intriguing
 
It's for Star Wars returning to Marvel who originally published some now defunct comics of in the 70s (included tid bits like Jabba being a muscular alien, and Luke's father being named "Tan")
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,359
Messages
22,091,999
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"