Tacit Ronin
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 20,527
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 31
I think the fact that we are even comparing a 2003 film to a 2008 one proves how great the first Hulk movie still looks.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! That truly was NUFF'SAID!!!I think the fact that we are even comparing a 2003 film to a 2008 one proves how great the first Hulk movie still looks.
Your wrong about that too.
Because what I said was a fact.
I think the fact that we are even comparing a 2003 film to a 2008 one proves how great the first Hulk movie still looks.
Ha this post was funny!!!However the only Crap taking place is when TIH faces Ang's Hulk and Craps on himself and at the same time says "Holy Crap"!!!!You and I both know He would take the canon off of a tank Samck TIH in the face a couple of times then Ang's Hulk would rip TIH's head off completly and use it as a Bowling Ball to Bowl down all those lousey Over Acting and/or Under Acting actors as well!!!!
Ha this post was funny!!!However the only Crap taking place is when TIH faces Ang's Hulk and Craps on himself and at the same time says "Holy Crap"!!!!You and I both know He would take the canon off of a tank Samck TIH in the face a couple of times then Ang's Hulk would rip TIH's head off completly and use it as a Bowling Ball to Bowl down all those lousey Over Acting and/or Under Acting actors as well!!!!
He looks STUPID!!!!!So what's your point? I'm gonna start calling you Mr. Rant.
He looks STUPID!!!!!
Yes, in that shot he doesn't look so good. Bad angle, and the CGI in that shot wasn't so good. But in others he looks much better. Contrast that with how he looks in AngHulk* where he looks "STUPID!!!" virtually ALL the time. TIH, is the lesser of two evils, I'd say.
I don't know. I'm not an avid Hulk fan so to speak, but I really like the design because it has monster-ish, neanderthal qualities without being too extreme (i.e. Jack Kirby's design). It's a nice combination of human and monster. The two film designs we've gotten so far have been too human for my taste, but that's purely a preference thing.
I will say that the TIH design is pretty good, but execution of it did nothing for me. Like I said in another thread, I still think the CG in that film was mediocre at best. There was not a second in that film where I didn't think the Hulk looked fake (whether it be the rubbery texture or the fact that he was lit horribly).
I think a crap marketing campaign is what killed TIH, and the fact that the first (failed) Hulk was too fresh in the public's psych. The public was not very interested in getting another hulk movie (even though it was a reboot) to begin with, and the fact that Marvel botched the marketing campaign didn't help. The teaser trailer was a POS and it greatly turned me off to the film, The later trailers were much better, but by then I think that much of the public wasn't interested, and the fact that there was not much promotion on TV or elsewhere didn't help. The marketing campaign was much more muted than the first film's, even though they had a much better movie to sell. It was kind of a no-win situation, sadly.
Look at how fake this looks with his caved in Chest.He looks like a Puppet a Maniquin.He looks like Rubber!!!!!!!!!!!
There is no deminsion to his body he looks like a Box!!!
I hate it!!!!
http://forums.superherohype.com/und...s/uncategorized/2008/06/12/hulksoldier660.jpg
I fail to see the logic in this. There will no doubt be comparisons to Ang Hulk because it was the first big-budget Hulk movie with a CGI monster. People can argue all day long which creature looked better, but this is only opinion.
TIH > Ang Lee's Hulk
now I enjoyed Ang's Hulk, but as far as movie/looks go, TIH has it beat hands down. More action, the movie flows smoother and faster (obviously) and Norton's Hulk is just far less boring looking than Ang's.
so there you have it, it's all opinion
One thing that's fact and not opinion is that Ang's Hulk had more action.
And...........Okay, whatever. This is getting extremely annoying.
You yourself call it horrible.......So why not just face it.You are out of your mind ..... and that's a HORRIBLE picture from that scene.
Never!The Ang Hulk was a beast who would have ripped TIH head off and then pulled out his Spleene!!!NO COMP!!!EVER!!!Yes, in that shot he doesn't look so good. Bad angle, and the CGI in that shot wasn't so good. But in others he looks much better. Contrast that with how he looks in AngHulk* where he looks "STUPID!!!" virtually ALL the time. TIH, is the lesser of two evils, I'd say.
*Wish we has a spit smiley as I feel the urge whenever I use Ang's name(may he burn in the fires of hell forever and ever, amen!).