DaddlerTheDalek
Starship Captain
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 2,795
- Reaction score
- 379
- Points
- 73
This looks awesome! I can't wait wait to play as a Battledroid!
That is because it didn't. I don't think it had heroes either, at least not ones you could control. I honestly can't remember, because I spent years playing the second game in comparison.
The Force is in all of us
[FONT="]When the original DICE Star Wars Battlefront released in 2015, select PC players were able to sign up for the game's alpha. With the sequel coming up, it seems likely that PlayStation 4 and Xbox One owners will also get a chance to get an early look at the game.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Recently, Community Manager of Star Wars Battlefront, Sledgehammer70 wrote a post on the Star Wars Battlefront 2 forums asking players to report bugs found in the game's alpha. In the bug reporting template, there is a choice for PS4, PC, and Xbox One.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Unfortunately, the post was deleted, likely to cover the tracks of a leak, but Reddit user CaptainPhantasma21 (Nice double-reference!) got a screenshot of the post before it was taken down.[/FONT]
[FONT="][/FONT]![]()
[FONT="]Will you be trying to get into the alpha for Star Wars Battlefront 2? Which console are you gunning for? Star Wars Battlefront 2 will get a full beta this Fall, and release November 17, 2017.[/FONT]
[FONT="][Via WCCFTech][/FONT]
IN THIS ARTICLE
[FONT="][/FONT][FONT="]Tags:
DICEEA
[/FONT]
we don't know if that the last of it heroes & villain's wise. So we'll see.Really? No Obi Wan?![]()
Which is why he'd be prime bait for future DLC. Like Finn and Jyn.He could play amazingly, but he's barely a film character and Obi-Wan...well he's Obi-Wan. You'd think they'd prioritise fan favourites lol
It'd be really funny (but not Ha-Ha funny) if they included someone like Bossk over Obi-Wan.
Well, they ruined it.
They made it pay to win.Huh?
Well, they ruined it.
That doesn't means they didn't just make the game easier for those that pay more.It is EA. It was always a very good possibility.
hmm as was said in the video of the run down above that article addressing the issue it's why it was put above it. (and please no one say i'm defending this practice , this is what they told gamer news outlets ) this is where most the game's industry as whole is looking into it or doing as trend and they say this is a model/ trend that blizzard started with over watch which they are fallowing.Yeah.. this is a textbook case of P2W. **** this game and anyone who supports it. You are part of the problem.
hmm as was said in the video of the run down above that article addressing the issue it's why it was put above it. (and please no one say i'm defending this practice , this is what they told gamer news outlets ) this is where most the game's industry as whole is looking into it or doing as trend and they say this is a model/ trend that blizzard started with over watch which they are fallowing.
It's being used a way for offset/ alternative have to paid dLc or putting it behind a pay wall which capcom and other's inthe same industry have been doing still doing. it's an alternative to those other hated practices.
For Example the former director doom saw of MHO (marvel heroes omega) told the gamers before he retired, that all new Zones ( which is what they call the games map's/ levels ) and new chapter's for the game won't used as paid DLc or put behind a pay wall, like whats done in DCUO's where the latter will only let you as player play what they call the latest news episodea (DCUO's call's there episode's) if you pay for it. that part only become free to all player's with out cost unless even newer Dlc come's out and the former Dlc is free to all other players that weren't allowed access to it.
in which certain player do the waiting game. and other's still have complaints.
so this is being used as new model/ alternative to that and what to do so where they don't make you pay for new Zones/ maps (<< the latter word in battle fronts case ) or new chapter's /episodes .
this was what is supposedly being used to off set paid dlc and pay wall standard/ new trend wise that half the games industry is looking into and fallowing which was started by blizzard with overwatch .
And supposedly be used as alternative to create new content with that other hated former method . now the only that is truly in question since those that are fallowing this trend over watch started will keep is as fair as that game . their in lock box's and the they claim all the in game gear people will supposed get will be the same and equal regardless .
You can't see the in game's stats on the gear in the lock box in that "oh that gear has the highest stat's and will let me win." they did this with in justice 2 where anything buy able is cosmetic only with buy able lock box's so no one get's that. and in game earned lock box's are the only ones that give player extra stats for injustice 2.
now since other's are fallowing this supposed new standard/ trend that blizzard started with the game Overwatch it remains to be seen which one will deviate or not .
apparently all gear will be on or is supposed to be the same level and people won't be able to do that , and most makig other procustion like injustice 2 did. but that remains to be seen .
but that was the reason this was supposedly made. It's an alternative way for some of to create new content with the other hate and complained about form of paid Dlc charges or having it behind a pay wall which people as stated in the run down video as reason part's of the game industry are seeking alternatives to paid DLC and pay wall of zone/ map's and chapters/ episode. and some certain people play the waiting game with some games til it becomes free's or overly cheap.
that way they get the supposed map's or new chapter's with out charge to the audiance/ buyers/ fans of the game supposedly.
but it remains to be seen which of these game publisher's will do it properly like overwatch is doing(for now ) to keep thing fair to their audiance/ buyers/ fans of the game.
those that don't keep thing fair will die as series.