Lightning Strykez!
Former Mod On Pension Pay
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2004
- Messages
- 32,406
- Reaction score
- 54
- Points
- 73
Storm's Hydrokinetic Attack:
Scientific Fact or Mere Fiction?
Scientific Fact or Mere Fiction?
Considering that yours truly has not launched a thread here in decades), I thought it'd be good to develop a discussion on the much-anticipated and debated "Tidal Wave" scene...and a little science to boot.
Thanks to the generosity of SHH user "PerfectStorm" this deleted scene can now be viewed on Youtube here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC2N9RcDNYA
Is such a feat scientifically possible, or is it pure fictionalized eye candy? Let's talk about it for a moment, shall we?
***
UNIT 1: WAS IT REALLY A "TIDAL WAVE"?
UNIT 1: WAS IT REALLY A "TIDAL WAVE"?
Well, the first thing we must realize is that technically we're not looking at a tidal wave per se. Tidal waves are large, destructive ocean waves, produced by seaquakes (underwater earthquakes), hurricanes, or strong winds. Tidal Waves are also known as tsunamis, which are generated by the attraction of the moon and sun.
Since Storm did not bring a wave across Alcatraz Island from the surrounding waters, obviously terming this a "tidal wave" would technically be innappropriate. Yet, as the clip shows, there was a consistent downpour from the skies. What accounts for it?
UNIT 2: CLOUDBURSTS: WHAT ARE THEY?
What we are actually viewing in the deleted scene is effectively called a cloudburst. Notice the two definitions Dictionary.com provides for this terminology:
DEFINITION #1
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source
cloud‧burst  /ˈklaʊdˌbɜrst/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[kloud-burst] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun a sudden and very heavy rainfall.
DEFINITION #2
Cloud-burst \Cloud"-burst`\, n. A sudden copious rainfall, as the whole cloud had been precipitated at once.
We all know that clouds are essentially airborne water formations. And simply put, when they get heavy, they produce what we know as rainfall. This is a natural process and ordinary in execution.
Cloudbursts, however, are sometimes a different matter. These take place very suddenly, resulting in a concentrated torrential downpour. In some countries flash floods were a biproduct of this erratic weather activity.
UNIT 3: IS "COMIC" STORM CAPABLE OF HYDROKINESIS?
In the comics, Storm has been shown to direct the path of lightning and wind. However, in the early 70's her creations of "flash floods" seemed to be a little too fantastic, as she was depicted forming waves from the palm of her hand, or inside enclosed buildings. Such panels showing her washing her enemies away may have looked cute, but certainly unbelievable. In recent years though, comic writers have brought scientific feasibility back into the mix, making such feats more feasible.
UNIT 4: IS "MOVIE" STORM CAPABLE OF HYDROKINESIS?
Considering that cloudbursts can happen via the earth's natural cycle, is it feasible for a mutant to quickly and deliberately channel precipitation into a specific place?
Well, recall the precision utilized in X2 where Storm summoned dozens of tornadoes to throw pursuing jet planes off-course. In fact, the first plane she attacked was actually spun off track by two twisters: One forming north (downward) and the other south (upward).
Clearly, the films have shown her ability to make cloud mass move rapidly. Therefore, is it really a stretch to assume she can't do the same with other weather phenomena? We must remember that Storm manipulates the elements on a psionic level--in other words, with the power of her mind. So hydrokinesis is certainly not beyond her grasp of ability.
UNIT 5: OTHER CLIP OBSERVATIONS
Notice on the ground below Storm that there is a strong wind funnel forming right before the cloud breaks. No doubt some of that energy was used to keep her afloat in the air. But she later used those same winds to drive the waters forward to cascade over the Evil Brotherhood of Mutants. So, in effect, she was using the wind energies to suck that water flow downward into a funnel, and then she generated a wall of wind to push the wave outward. Summoning bolts of lightning for the electrocution of the X-Men's enemies was the finishing touch.
Some have complained that the cloud mass formed too quickly in the scene. But again, I point to the example in X2's dogfight scene--Storm had the cloud mass moving even faster there.
In addition, I really believe that Callisto attacked her AFTER Storm created the cloudburst. I hate the way the theatrical version makes it seem as if Storm rose up to create something awesome, only to be humbled prematurely. The full footage explains why Callisto considered her a threat that needed to be taken out.
UNIT 6: WHY WAS IT DELETED?
Brett Ratner's "redundant" explanation notwithstanding, it is my opinion that this scene (like the Phoenix/Forest Attack clip) should have been kept in. It would have fleshed out Storm's role in the final battle, as she is the only X-Man in the theatrical version that did not have a share in fighting multiple opponents. Instead, she spent her entire time wrapped up with Callisto.
While the SFX could use some work, I think the concept in itself is brilliant and creative. If they had more time to clean it up with the effects it could've proven to be an awesome money shot for the theatrical version. It's a shame that all of that $$$ went to waste.
Hopefully, lessons will be learned.
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION
1.) What do you think of the clip?
2.) What do you think of Brett Ratner's reasons for cutting the scene (that Storm using lightning twice in battle would be too "redundant")?
3.) If/when an extended "Director's Cut" is released should the editors/SFX teams restore this scene and include it?
1.) What do you think of the clip?
2.) What do you think of Brett Ratner's reasons for cutting the scene (that Storm using lightning twice in battle would be too "redundant")?
3.) If/when an extended "Director's Cut" is released should the editors/SFX teams restore this scene and include it?