kguillou
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2005
- Messages
- 26,884
- Reaction score
- 25,554
- Points
- 103
Interesting. Until Thor 3 happened, I had it as the best. But I flip flop around this and Logan on which is better. To me its the fact that they went low scale with this story even though they could potentially do a $1B movie with a bit more Stark and a bigger villain is such a good call. It shows they have their long term plans worked out well. And yeah, I feel its the best Spidey movie ever, at least live action.
IMO, I think Holland is most definitely the best Spider-man ever, he nails Peter and Spider-man whereas both Tobey and Garfield struggled with certain aspects (especially Garfield), but imo, I think Sam Raimi still nailed the core and feel of Spider-man's world like neither Webb or Watts has done. Sure, some aspects are dated now but man, Spider-man 1 and 2 are the comic books brought to life in a lovingly earnest way. That same earnestness is what I felt was sorely missing out of Homecoming.
I think what sums it up perfectly for me is Spider-man 1 and 2 both ended with beautifully filmed, triumphant sequences of Spider-man swinging through Manhattan to an epic Danny Elfman score, Homecoming literally ended with a "What the F***?!" Now, its funny, don't get me wrong, but, I was also kind of like "seriously? that's how they end it? With a joke?"