Matt
IKYN Guy Groupie
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2000
- Messages
- 80,934
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 31
You mean, you're practicing the Singer approach?
Well, if he can get 250 million dollars and unlimited control doing it, why not me?

You mean, you're practicing the Singer approach?
Well, if he can get 250 million dollars and unlimited control doing it, why not me?![]()
depends...
is it a complete reboot, or is it a sequel to Superman Returns?
If you'll give me behind the scenes access I'll go on message boards and scream about how "Matt is bringing the greatest depection of Superman ever brought to screen!"
As long as you bring me in, I am behind it.
hmm...Whatever you'd like it to be. You make your Superman.![]()
As little as I know about it, I think my Superman movie wouldn't be that different from Burton's one.
Keep reading and feel free to hate it.
I'd be basing his personality in the first comics. He'd be quite heroic and incorruptible but cocky and sarcastic without being annoying or offensive.
The suit would be almost the same as that Jon Peters' statue.
Clark Kent would be genuinely shy. Not a pretended dork but an actual introvert shy guy. But very professional an all.
If you're not hating it yet, let's hear this: Clark and Superman would have different appearances. Superman would have a different face and body. As if Clark had a muscular handsome brother. Glasses haven't been, are not and never will be a disguise. Of course as Clark, he'd still be having super-powers. He wouldn't be "hatingh" to be Superman at all, he'd be proud of it, but he'd realize the irony behind being Superman and being appreciated by people and girls (specially Lois) but despised as Clark at the same time.
Now, if you're quoting me, please come up with something better than "Too good you're not making a Superman movie" or crap like that because for a starter, nobody in here is directing one.![]()
As little as I know about it, I think my Superman movie wouldn't be that different from Burton's one.
Keep reading and feel free to hate it.
I'd be basing his personality in the first comics. He'd be quite heroic and incorruptible but cocky and sarcastic without being annoying or offensive.
The suit would be almost the same as that Jon Peters' statue.
Clark Kent would be genuinely shy. Not a pretended dork but an actual introvert shy guy. But very professional an all.
If you're not hating it yet, let's hear this: Clark and Superman would have different appearances. Superman would have a different face and body. As if Clark had a muscular handsome brother. Glasses haven't been, are not and never will be a disguise. Of course as Clark, he'd still be having super-powers. He wouldn't be "hatingh" to be Superman at all, he'd be proud of it, but he'd realize the irony behind being Superman and being appreciated by people and girls (specially Lois) but despised as Clark at the same time.
Now, if you're quoting me, please come up with something better than "Too good you're not making a Superman movie" or crap like that because for a starter, nobody in here is directing one.![]()
Well...I hate to ruin your fun but...THANK GOD YOU ARE NOT DIRECTING A SUPERMAN MOVIE and your ideas shines a light on WHY we`ve been discussing Superman and went nowhere. You simply dont respect or know the character at all.THank you for writing this. I wont waste my time with you again. See ya.
cool![]()
Outside of the whole suit thing (IMO Superman's suit shouldn't be radically changed from what it is), that's not a bad set of ideas there. The two-different-appearances thing sounds like what they did in the original MAD Magazine spoof "Superduperman!", where Clark was a four-foot weed with greasy hair and Super(duper)man was seven feet of pure muscle with a crew cut.
you and I may not agree SR wise, but I'm always open to change. I did enjoy the kid angle and Richard.lol
What's with you man?![]()
you and I may not agree SR wise, but I'm always open to change. I did enjoy the kid angle and Richard.
I even got that to work in a MOS storyline I did earlier this year
I can't believe it.
It has been nice to talk to you like this man.![]()
I don't know that I can write this in yet another thread. Matt I'm trying not to sit this thread out cause you're a bud and all but I've participated in this one so many times
Bah shorten it- here ya go cause your MATT lol
Theme of movie=manipulation (lex manipulates Corben for Metallo, Brainiac manipulates Lex)
Man of STEEL=also implying Metallo hidden meaning
Begin with= younger Jor-el 20 minutes backstory leading up to destruction of Krypton incorporating Brainiac (all credit given to TAS) which can be used later in film as a foe to Clark.
Next= 10 minutes of SV Clark growing up. Parents still alive ala L&C btw. Clark gets his job, meets Lois and DP gang for first time. Also introduction to Lex- on a story Clark tags a long with Lois and meets Lex who is successful head of Lexcorp. Superman makes first appearance- Lex takes notice of headlines.
Middle to end- Lex gained tech from Brainiac. Creates Metallo. Metallo fights Superman. Brainiac takes over Lexcorp, Lex plays innocent not taking blame for Metallo fight with Superman. Superman doesn't trust him. Lex finds it funny in an egomaniacal way.