• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Superman vs. Captain Marvel

Superman vs. Captain Marvel

  • Superman

  • Captain Marvel


Results are only viewable after voting.
Whirlysplat said:
Your post makes no sense.

- Whirly

What else would you expect.

If he suddenly started making sense I would fall to my knees and beg forgivness for my transgressions as it would surely mark the coming of the end of days
 
Whirlysplat said:
Rites, so its religious am I right?

- Whirly

Well the whole Shazam, power of the gods thing is mostly considered mythology today but originally it was religion.

Don't pick on my spelling or I'll pick on your punctuation:woot:.
 
CanaryFan said:
Well the whole Shazam, power of the gods thing is mostly considered mythology today but originally it was religion.

Don't pick on my spelling or I'll pick on your punctuation:woot:.

Nothing wrong with my punctuation, most of the time. A lot of the time it's an elaborated code on here.

- Whirly
 
I'm 24, and most of my friends are around the same age. When any of us mention Green Lantern, we're referring to Hal. The rest of them are referred to by their first names. Hal's the only one we refer to as 'Green Lantern'. I've never met anyone who said 'Who, that black dude?' when I've referenced GL. Most of them say 'Never heard of 'im.'
My statements are based solely on personal experience, though.
As far as Captain Marvel goes, he and Billy Batson are NOT THE SAME PERSON. If you morons understood the concept of dichotomy, it'd be a lot easier to understand Superman getting owned by Captain Marvel, then nearly crushing Billy's jaw.
When Clark's writing a newspaper, he's still Superman underneath those glasses. When Billy's broadcasting the news, he's just a normal kid, or in Kingdom Come, adult.
Having said that, Spider-Man CANNOT beat the Hulk. He would have his way with Banner, however. Also; Supes CANNOT defeat Captain Marvel, but Billy Batson wouldn't even be a challenge.
 
chuckymack said:
I'm 24, and most of my friends are around the same age. When any of us mention Green Lantern, we're referring to Hal. The rest of them are referred to by their first names. Hal's the only one we refer to as 'Green Lantern'. I've never met anyone who said 'Who, that black dude?' when I've referenced GL. Most of them say 'Never heard of 'im.'
My statements are based solely on personal experience, though.


Exactly, but you state them as fact.
 
and no... the real green lantern is:
A) Alan Scott, since he was the ORIGINAL Green Lantern in the DCU
or
B) Anyone who was chosen to wield a ring created by the Guardians, fueled by the Central Power battery on Oa and shaped by the willpower of the wielder
 
Vic Von Doom said:
What sucks about it? Johns brought back a character that never should have gone away in the first place along with his archenemy, and did it in a way that didn't make people scratch their heads and say whaaaaa like the wacked out way Green Arrow came back, for instance.

But if you were with me til then, that means you enjoyed Jordan in LWAT and New Frontier...do you like the guy or not? Or do you just not like the way his solo book is going right now? Because I hate the Spider-Man books right now, but I don't call Spidey a *****.

Because Rebirth was a load of garbage. They turned Hal into a monster, which was cool, the best becoming the enemy like the man who trained him. Then he was the Spectre (which, sucked, because the only person more emo than him at that time was Kyle.), and then they brought him back? He could've REMAINED the Spectre, or just went out with Barry Allen.
 
Vic Von Doom said:
How did it insult fans intelligence? I didn't feel insulted and I liked the explanation of Parallax. It was a good way to explain Hal's insanity without retconning anything.

And Parralax? That was horrible. I liked the idea that the Guardians of Oa were smart enough to put a failsafe in the ring of lesser minded beings without it having to be some cosmic entity that shared emotions with a color, and made Hal out to be a squeaky clean hero again without it. Hal was better when he was actually human enough to become corruptable. Not when the only thing that could corrupt him was some sort of space god that actually could challenge the Guardians.

And it totally retconned the ring's weakness to yellow.
 
chuckymack said:
I'm 24, and most of my friends are around the same age. When any of us mention Green Lantern, we're referring to Hal. The rest of them are referred to by their first names. Hal's the only one we refer to as 'Green Lantern'. I've never met anyone who said 'Who, that black dude?' when I've referenced GL. Most of them say 'Never heard of 'im.'
My statements are based solely on personal experience, though.
As far as Captain Marvel goes, he and Billy Batson are NOT THE SAME PERSON. If you morons understood the concept of dichotomy, it'd be a lot easier to understand Superman getting owned by Captain Marvel, then nearly crushing Billy's jaw.
When Clark's writing a newspaper, he's still Superman underneath those glasses. When Billy's broadcasting the news, he's just a normal kid, or in Kingdom Come, adult.
Having said that, Spider-Man CANNOT beat the Hulk. He would have his way with Banner, however. Also; Supes CANNOT defeat Captain Marvel, but Billy Batson wouldn't even be a challenge.

First, to the GL thing. Broaden your horizons, and your friends. I don't give a damn what YOU or your FRIENDS think. What you think doesn't make you right, it just means that's what you think. And I hardly believe you guys make up the representative sample of an entire planet. Especially if they've never heard of John Stewart.

As for Captain Marvel. You actually have to be more clear. If you (read:the moron you are trying to issue to others) were thinking, you'd say their POWERS are different. Because Billy's at the wheel under both persona's. And his powers are a PART of him permanantly. So whether he's plain old Billy, or the Captain, he's still BOTH, and the only thing that separates them is a word. When he's at the radio station, he's still Captain, when he's pulling a boulder off a dog, he's still Billy. So even then, being more clear, you'd have to say the basis of their powers.

And I don't know HOW that correlates into the Spider-Man/Hulk fight.
 
Vic Von Doom said:
Pfff. I don't get it. Did you read New Frontier? The Last Will and Testament of Hal Jordan? Rebirth? He socked Batman in the jaw! He's the bravest man on Earth! In a Corps made up of the bravest men and women and whatevers on each planet, he's the greatest of them all, except when he's murdering the other ones...but that was just the one time and he's better now.

Oh! And he sacrificed his life to reignite the SUN! He saved the entire solar system!

punching batman in the jaw doesn't make him that great you know? it's only because some stupid writer let him do that, bats would never allow it, AND bats punched him back. plus, hal killed the whole corps!!! how come everybody keeps forgetting that???? i know i know, i read rebirth too...but i still wouldn't forgive him, i prefer kyle:up:
 
Mistress Gluon said:
First, to the GL thing. Broaden your horizons, and your friends. I don't give a damn what YOU or your FRIENDS think. What you think doesn't make you right, it just means that's what you think. And I hardly believe you guys make up the representative sample of an entire planet. Especially if they've never heard of John Stewart.

As for Captain Marvel. You actually have to be more clear. If you (read:the moron you are trying to issue to others) were thinking, you'd say their POWERS are different. Because Billy's at the wheel under both persona's. And his powers are a PART of him permanantly. So whether he's plain old Billy, or the Captain, he's still BOTH, and the only thing that separates them is a word. When he's at the radio station, he's still Captain, when he's pulling a boulder off a dog, he's still Billy. So even then, being more clear, you'd have to say the basis of their powers.

And I don't know HOW that correlates into the Spider-Man/Hulk fight.

you know, i support you with almost everything you are saying, but as far as i knew, captain and billy aren't the same person, they actually are different persons, it was explained in DKR2
 
DKR2 is out of contuinity. Billy and Captain Marvel are the same, as shown by almost everything but DKR2.
 
Harlekin said:
DKR2 is out of contuinity. Billy and Captain Marvel are the same, as shown by almost everything but DKR2.

Merci, monseiur. ;)
 
well, since billy and captain are the same...then wouldn't clark beating billy mean he also beated captain marvel?
 
Mistress Gluon said:
Merci, monseiur. ;)
Aucun problème, I guess, madame. ;)

And no, beating Billy does not equate to beating Captain Marvel. That's like saying Hal Jordan without his GL ring is the same as beating Hal Jordan with the GL ring.
 
ok...well, then gimme a minute to process this logic
 
incubat said:
ok...well, then gimme a minute to process this logic
Billy Batson = Captain Marvel
Beating Billy Batson /= (does not equal) Beating Captain Marvel

Hal Jordan without GL Ring = Hal Jordan with GL Ring
Beating Hal Jordan without GL Ring /= Beating Hal with GL Ring

Or maybe a Marvel example would be better:
Billy Batson = Captain Marvel
Beating Billy Batson /= (does not equal) Beating Captain Marvel

Chris Powell = Darkhawk
Beating Chris Powell /= Beating Darkhawk
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"