But what does "Best game" even mean on Survivor?! There's no one set way to play Survivor. How can someone who lost be a better player than the winner? Winning essentially means that you played the best out of all your opponents.
How was Russell's way of making it to the Final Three any better than the way Natalie made it to the Final Three? They made the same alliance on day one, they lost as many challenges as each other, they went to the same amount of Tribal Councils, they even received the same amount of votes at the end of the game as each other.
Her game was just as impressive, moreso since she actually won, than his. She was the last woman standing from Foa Foa after they were all picked off, she convinced the Galu girls to turn on one of their own, she kept true to the same alliance from the first day, she voted out the exact same people as Russell at every Tribal Council yet they still liked her at the end. That is impressive.
I was reading Courtney's post show interviews and she made a great statement about Russell when asked if he ever talked to her. She said something to the effect that if you're not valuable to Russell's game he simply ignores you.
If that's doesn't explain why he didn't win last season or why he probably won't ever win, I don't know what will.