There is only deserving winner at this point....and it is strange to say, but Phillip deserves it. That said, Natalie probably WILL win it (unless Ashley can win another two immunity challenges in a row).
I think we're getting another coattail winner and it will most likely be Natalie. I think too many spite Phil and I'm sure the Zapatera don't have much appreciation for Rob.
Matt or Grant are who I'm rooting for. If they don't return, Phillip, because of the post above.
I do not want to see Rob or the useless girls win or anyone from the old Zapatera tribe that completely gave up on a challenge just to get rid of one person.
You know it. The fact that we haven't gotten as much as one confessional stating that Natalie is a huge threat to sweep the final vote is the proof that she's winning. We had Rob mention every reason why he shouldn't take her to the finals except he seemed oblivious to her good look, sweetness, and innocence being attributes. We haven't heard his reasoning for taking her to the finals. Has there been on moment where Rob M. has stated his plan for taking Natalie to the Finals? I may have missed it.
Personally, Rob appears to be starstruck by Natalie. He's got a little crush on her or something to that effect.
I just wonder how badly Rob will flip out if he loses again...![]()
He confirmed Phil and Nat being final three after Nat told him about Ashley and Ralph's talk. He overreacted and painted Ashley as untrustworthy. I laughed when Rob said to Nat he would never cross her last episode but that might turn out to be true.
I can't root for someone who was voted out. It contradicts the nature of the game too heavily.
Well they are surviving on RI. Besides, they're the lesser of evils when it comes to Rob, useless girls and old Zapatera. Imo ofcourse.
So, basically, what you're saying is that the entire Redemption Island thing is pointless?
Personally, I can't wait for his horrible acting at the final tribal. The man is the worst fake crier.![]()
Yes. Its the same reason that Lil didn't deserve to win despite playing a better game than Sandra. If you're voted out, you do not deserve the million.
I see where you're coming from, but its a new part of the game. Had they been voted out and some producer or someone put them back in the game, then yeah. But atleast they're still doing challenges and surviving.
I don't know maybe its just me, but I see people winning challenges more deserving than coattail riders that never win one single challenge.
Oh well, whoever wins on Sunday I'm sure will not be deserving of the million in most peoples eyes.
Assuming the F4 is
-Phillip
-Rob M.
-Natalie (no immunity)
-Matt/Andrea/Grant
if you're Phillip, do you make the move to eliminate Natalie? She won't be starting any fire over the likes of the three mentioned, so she'd be the last juror. The merits of taking the Redemption returnee over Natalie are:
Matt: Horrendous performance in the game, blindsided twice by the same people, stabbed in the back by his closest ally, and didn't play Survivor. He played Redemption Island. He saw three tribal councils and was voted out at two of them.
Andrea: Again, another person already voted out of the game. Was played by Rob the entire time and then discarded when her usefulness expired. Failed to make a big move with her closest ally and ultimately stabbed him in the back.
Grant: Okay, Grant is the one guy other than Mike that I would consider not taking to F3 and keeping Natalie. He's well-spoken, he was a strong competitor, he makes an emotional connection when he talks about his wife, and he's an attractive guy. That said, he was voted out of the game, he was used by Rob. Rob let him believe that he was calling the shots... until he wasn't calling the shots and he was voted out. He wouldn't even eat fish with Zapatera.
Promos all day have been hyping Rob as 'one of the greatest players ever'. I really don't see it...
Promos all day have been hyping Rob as 'one of the greatest players ever'. I really don't see it...