Spade
Seeking new challengers
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2006
- Messages
- 9,970
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 58
Disclaimer: This thread isn't for TDK or P:WZ-bashing; it's an observation on the direction of Frank's character in this film.
It occured to me, after watching The Dark Knight, that I found Harvey Dent to be closer to the modern Punisher than this new Punisher movie. I won't spoil any script details, but we all know that the Punisher does something that instigates a manhunt from the press release. During the course of that, Frank tries to find retribution.
My question is this- why? I'll use Dent as an example (without spoiling what comic fans don't already know). In The Dark Knight, we see how a traumatic event makes a certain district attorney more than a little mad. Yes, I get that he has a valid reason for seeking revenge. But we see afterwards that this spirals out of control and he eventually becomes a violent parody of his former self.
I bring this up because that sounds more like the comic Punisher I know than what Lexi's Punisher is. The comic book Punisher lost his family, and God knows what I would do in the same situation. But that was some time ago, and readers have questioned more than once whether Frank's ongoing quest is as justified as he would like to believe. Now contrast this from Lexi's Punisher, who seems to be a more violent Batman.
Some might say the Batman parallels are unavoidable, but are the two really one in the same? One works with the law, albeit bending it, for the greater good and a just world. The other not only breaks the law, but despises its flaws, instead believing that the consequences for evil actions should be absolute. So the whole "one in the same" argument is flawed. Why, then, does there seem to be an attempt to rationalize and/or elevate Frank here? He's practically a villain with minor justifications for his actions.
So, I ask you- is this really in the spirit of the Punisher we know and love, or did Christopher and Jonathan Nolan inadvertedly give us that in their film?
It occured to me, after watching The Dark Knight, that I found Harvey Dent to be closer to the modern Punisher than this new Punisher movie. I won't spoil any script details, but we all know that the Punisher does something that instigates a manhunt from the press release. During the course of that, Frank tries to find retribution.
My question is this- why? I'll use Dent as an example (without spoiling what comic fans don't already know). In The Dark Knight, we see how a traumatic event makes a certain district attorney more than a little mad. Yes, I get that he has a valid reason for seeking revenge. But we see afterwards that this spirals out of control and he eventually becomes a violent parody of his former self.
I bring this up because that sounds more like the comic Punisher I know than what Lexi's Punisher is. The comic book Punisher lost his family, and God knows what I would do in the same situation. But that was some time ago, and readers have questioned more than once whether Frank's ongoing quest is as justified as he would like to believe. Now contrast this from Lexi's Punisher, who seems to be a more violent Batman.
Some might say the Batman parallels are unavoidable, but are the two really one in the same? One works with the law, albeit bending it, for the greater good and a just world. The other not only breaks the law, but despises its flaws, instead believing that the consequences for evil actions should be absolute. So the whole "one in the same" argument is flawed. Why, then, does there seem to be an attempt to rationalize and/or elevate Frank here? He's practically a villain with minor justifications for his actions.
So, I ask you- is this really in the spirit of the Punisher we know and love, or did Christopher and Jonathan Nolan inadvertedly give us that in their film?