KevanG
Pragmatic Villain
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2005
- Messages
- 27,380
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 58
Right, so this isn't an issue with the name at all.
That's why I was confused. Your post made it seem as though it was the name, "Columbian Mammoth," rather than the specific wording of the bill, that was at issue.
No, my issue is that they can't just use the existing name on it but they demand an inclusion of their religion to be a forced addition to it.