The Avengers The Avengers: News and Speculation - Part 27A sub-se - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Part 50

[Scarlettess]

btw is anyone from here going to the premiere? and when are they usually?

 

[04nbod]

Alexei, have you considered that maybe, just maybe, Natalie might be busy with something else?

Like, oh, I don't know, raising her newborn child? You know, that thing that parents do?

And that maybe that she doesn't necessarily need to be in this story because, god forbid, it might NOT have something to do with her?

What is weird is that they found a way to include Pepper (and I'm glad) but only Jane has been set up to have an actual role -finding Thor and getting him back but they didn't get her for even one scene. A role seemingly given to Selvig despite the fact he had no role in her work or theory.

I agree, but alot of people seem to be obsessed with her for some reason.

People goshdarn like her. Marvel is an absolute failure with Thor's love interests. Sif just doesn't fit the role, she's meant to be this amazing empowered goddess and just comes across as desperate for the love of a guy that isn't as interested in her. Goes to show, you can give a girl a sword, it doesn't make her strong.

Jane needs to find a nice human guy... She's hogging Sif's man.

Wrong way around man!!

Sif needs to step off.

 

[BigThor]

People goshdarn like her. Marvel is an absolute failure with Thor's love interests. Sif just doesn't fit the role, she's meant to be this amazing empowered goddess and just comes across as desperate for the love of a guy that isn't as interested in her. Goes to show, you can give a girl a sword, it doesn't make her strong.

Okay

 

[Scarlettess]

What is weird is that they found a way to include Pepper (and I'm glad) but only Jane has been set up to have an actual role -finding Thor and getting him back but they didn't get her for even one scene. A role seemingly given to Selvig despite the fact he had no role in her work or theory.




People goshdarn like her. Marvel is an absolute failure with Thor's love interests. Sif just doesn't fit the role, she's meant to be this amazing empowered goddess and just comes across as desperate for the love of a guy that isn't as interested in her. Goes to show, you can give a girl a sword, it doesn't make her strong.

not to get back on topic with this again, but the bolded part is exactly why having even a few second cameo i think would have worked. As Heimidall says at the end of Thor 'How is she?" "She's searching for you", I thought having her actually find the way, or at least help in getting Thor back to earth would have been in enough to be tied into the story, without overdoing it or having her there for no reason.

Anyway I don't really care if she's in it or not, The Avengers has plenty enough going on as it is, which I can't wait to see all of that on the big screen in a months time t:

 

[04nbod]

Okay

Desperate not to get into this are't you. Embrace the Foster love BigThor. Stop hating on the pint size, adorable, awkward science lady. t:

 

[Chewy]

What is weird is that they found a way to include Pepper (and I'm glad) but only Jane has been set up to have an actual role -finding Thor and getting him back but they didn't get her for even one scene. A role seemingly given to Selvig despite the fact he had no role in her work or theory.

She was 7-8 months pregnant at the time...

 

[04nbod]

She was 7-8 months pregnant at the time...

And Hawkeye's cameo in Thor wasn't done in principal photography...

 

[BigThor]

Desperate not to get into this are't you. Embrace the Foster love BigThor. Stop hating on the pint size, adorable, awkward science lady. t:

Lol

 

[Scarlettess]

lets not get into this again. Jane will appear in Thor 2....now back to Avengers t:

so....who's EXCITED?!

 

[Whiskey Tango]

so....who's EXCITED?!

me!

 

[Chewy]

And Hawkeye's cameo in Thor wasn't done in principal photography...

Who says Portman didn't have a cameo filmed later? We wouldn't know about it until April if she did

 

[BigThor]

lets not get into this again. Jane will appear in Thor 2....now back to Avengers t:

so....who's EXCITED?!

Trust me, we wont

 

[Chewy]

So apparently Hunger Games is incredible. If Avengers turns out great, and TDKR, and the Hobbit...

What a year for movies t:

 

[Poni_Boy]

OH MY GOD PEOPLE STOP ACTING LIKE YOU KNOW WHAT'S IN THE MOVIE!

The ridiculous statements here are astounding. Why do some of you people think you know what fits into a movie you haven't seen yet better than the production team? They could have cut in unused Thor footage for Portman, she could have recorded a voice over, or maybe they didn't WANT Jane in it at all. So many possibilities that don't fit into what your assumptions are. Jesus. Stop acting like the filmmakers took a misstep until you are absolutely sure what the hell is going to happen. Up until two days ago it wasn't clear if Paltrow was going to be in the film.

And, I'm sorry fellas, Pepper Potts is way more important than Jane Foster to the MCU. You can't have Stark Industries brandished without Pepper showing up.

 

[catgirl18]

thor and jane They would be way more interesting.
I hate sif in the comics and the movie

 

[Poni_Boy]

btw is anyone from here going to the premiere? and when are they usually?

I'll be at the NYC one. It's slated for April 1st

 

[Drummerdude7]

Personally, Jane showing up isn't as important to me as explaining just how Thor gets back to Earth. That's my one curious point.

 

[Poni_Boy]

A movie can only have so many characters in it. They need to add a cosmic level hero to the team for whichever sequel has Thanos in it but otherwise he is a perfectly cinematic villain and a great finale to the Avengers film saga

Absolutely. The only Avengers right now that can even stand a chance against Thanos in a believable cinematic way are Thor and Hulk. They need a handful of cosmic heroes to balance it out.

 

[Chewy]

I'll be at the NYC one. It's slated for April 1st

I hate you

 

[J.Howlett]

OH MY GOD PEOPLE STOP ACTING LIKE YOU KNOW WHAT'S IN THE MOVIE!

The ridiculous statements here are astounding. Why do some of you people think you know what fits into a movie you haven't seen yet better than the production team? They could have cut in unused Thor footage for Portman, she could have recorded a voice over, or maybe they didn't WANT Jane in it at all. So many possibilities that don't fit into what your assumptions are. Jesus. Stop acting like the filmmakers took a misstep until you are absolutely sure what the hell is going to happen. Up until two days ago it wasn't clear if Paltrow was going to be in the film.

And, I'm sorry fellas, Pepper Potts is way more important than Jane Foster to the MCU. You can't have Stark Industries brandished without Pepper showing up.

And you can't have the ending of Thor as it is and not address the situation in the Avengers once Thor sets foot on Earth.

That's how big that ending of Thor was....

...which is the reason why they should've left Thor on Earth at the end of the film. A part of the Avengers film is going to have to explain how he got back and that's time that could be used for something else had they left Thor on Earth at the end of his film.

 

[Chewy]

And you can't have the ending of Thor as it is and not address the situation in the Avengers once Thor sets foot on Earth.

That's how big that ending of Thor was....

...which is the reason why they should've left Thor on Earth at the end of the film. A part of the Avengers film is going to have to explain how he got back and that's time that could be used for something else had they left Thor on Earth at the end of his film.

Here's a thought: they're probably going to address the situation

 

[BigThor]

OH MY GOD PEOPLE STOP ACTING LIKE YOU KNOW WHAT'S IN THE MOVIE!

The ridiculous statements here are astounding. Why do some of you people think you know what fits into a movie you haven't seen yet better than the production team? They could have cut in unused Thor footage for Portman, she could have recorded a voice over, or maybe they didn't WANT Jane in it at all. So many possibilities that don't fit into what your assumptions are. Jesus. Stop acting like the filmmakers took a misstep until you are absolutely sure what the hell is going to happen. Up until two days ago it wasn't clear if Paltrow was going to be in the film.

And, I'm sorry fellas, Pepper Potts is way more important than Jane Foster to the MCU. You can't have Stark Industries brandished without Pepper showing up.

 

[Poni_Boy]

And you can't have the ending of Thor as it is and not address the situation in the Avengers once Thor sets foot on Earth.

That's how big that ending of Thor was....

...which is the reason why they should've left Thor on Earth at the end of the film. A part of the Avengers film is going to have to explain how he got back and that's time that could be used for something else had they left Thor on Earth at the end of his film.

Sorry, but that's a cop out. The ending of that movie was the ending of that movie. Shoulda, woulda, coulda is irelevant to The Avengers. And Thor shouldn't have to rely on anyone to transport him back and forth between Asgard and Earth. THAT is what they will address in this film, and I doubt it'll take more than 2 minutes of screentime.

 

[J.Howlett]

Here's a thought: they're probably going to address the situation

They better...in a satisfactory way.

 

[Poni_Boy]

Here's a thought: they're probably going to address the situation

Common sense. You has it.