batman_1989_
Civilian
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
- Messages
- 653
- Reaction score
- 222
- Points
- 28
Nice images but way too similar too Batfleck... plus Pattinson will not be in that shape at all.. which is a huge aspect of how the suit will look
yup, we need to start seeing concepts on models based on Pattison's physique which may be heard to pin down - i feel Kilmer's the most similar so far if we have to compare. Any suit can look great on paper. Otherwise all we are seeing is a cool image.uh...concept drawings aren't ever really a baseline for how the actual costume is to be fitted, unless it's CG.
Kilmer's cowl was greatyup, we need to start seeing concepts on models based on Pattison's physique which may be heard to pin down - i feel Kilmer's the most similar so far if we have to compare. Any suit can look great on paper. Otherwise all we are seeing is a cool image.
They need to ditch the one piece rubber cowl completely imo, even in BvS it clearly was restrictive, I think prosthetics (to allow greater neck mobility as well as allowing the actor's eyebrows and cheeks to emote) or a more mixed material design (think Daredevil with a higher budget) would be better. Same goes for the suit in general, fabric over a lightweight muscle suit is the way to go imo, Spider-Man films have been proving it works for years, just design the fabric suit to look heavier duty and it'd be fine.I hate all the 90's cowl and the Batman Begins one to be honest. I can't respect a cowl that doesn't allow for neck movement lol
They need to ditch the one piece rubber cowl completely imo, even in BvS it clearly was restrictive, I think prosthetics (to allow greater neck mobility as well as allowing the actor's eyebrows and cheeks to emote) or a more mixed material design (think Daredevil with a higher budget) would be better. Same goes for the suit in general, fabric over a lightweight muscle suit is the way to go imo, Spider-Man films have been proving it works for years, just design the fabric suit to look heavier duty and it'd be fine.
Well that's all we're really comparing notes on is what I mean - the design. Leave the nittygritty for the costume & make-up dept. I have no clue what you mean by Kilmer's suit. Had a very Beetle definition to it.yup, we need to start seeing concepts on models based on Pattison's physique which may be heard to pin down - i feel Kilmer's the most similar so far if we have to compare. Any suit can look great on paper. Otherwise all we are seeing is a cool image.
Well that's all we're really comparing notes on is what I mean - the design. Leave the nittygritty for the costume & make-up dept. I have no clue what you mean by Kilmer's suit. Had a very Beetle definition to it.
Pattinson comes across as the lankiest of the actors who donned the cowl and yeah, sure Bale did The Machinist but still the vampire shtick fitted like a glove. We might really be in for a reinvention if it was between him & Nicholas Hoult based on body type.I think he was saying that Val Kilmer and Robert Pattinson will probably be similar in body/build.
This was Kilmer in Batman Forever and yeah, I think that Pattinson's going to look similar:I think he was saying that Val Kilmer and Robert Pattinson will probably be similar in body/build.
Kilmer's physique, he's similar to Pattison - slim, broad.Well that's all we're really comparing notes on is what I mean - the design. Leave the nittygritty for the costume & make-up dept. I have no clue what you mean by Kilmer's suit. Had a very Beetle definition to it.
Eh. No. I could be wrong, but I think Pattinson will be at least as buff as Charlie Cox in Daredevil Season 3 and best case scenario Skarsgard in Tarzan. We're in different times nowadays.
Also, while Pattinson hasn't yet gotten to Bale's levels of transforming himself, he is indeed pretty meticulous in crafting the appearance of his characters. I don't think he'd use his normal physique for Batman, he'll probably try to change his appearance as much as possible to disappear into the character like he tends to like to do.
thing is, definition is fairly easy to get... mass is the tough one. Lean up, hit the weights and before shirtless scenes pump out a few sets.. but to be bulky and still retain that lean edge.. will be tough. Any recent pics of Pattison would be a good indicator, i haven't seen Cox's physique, but i can imagine he is lean with good definition... ok i just took a look, he isn't very broad, good abs tho which create a good illusion. It's all angle work too...
I see that image and think, god damn, they did the impossible in making BTAS Bruce Wayne come to life.Kilmer's physique, he's similar to Pattison - slim, broad.
I hate all the 90's cowl and the Batman Begins one to be honest. I can't respect a cowl that doesn't allow for neck movement lol
Here are some Pattinson pics from last year after training casually for a few months I think.
Assuming he looks like that right now, in 8 months time he should achieve a great physique after the intense physical training and strict diet, something like this:
But even then there's a chance for him to achieve something even more impressive.
This is silly.
Close the thread. Discussion's over.
You've done it again, Watson!This is silly.