Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]318107[/split]
As for Bond 23, seemingly anything is possible now that the Royale-Quantum storyline has seemingly come to a close.
I love the idea of putting Moneypenny in the film, he said. Im dead keen to do it. And Q. However, Craig stressed that there needed to be some characterization to these two MI6 favourites. He said: I work from the premise that there are millions and millions of people out there who never saw one of the earlier Bond movies. So they dont understand the martini gag. Or the Moneypenny gag, which is a gagit had ceased to be a character. So, lets find out who she is. We can have fun doing that. And, dont get me wrong, Im up for a submarine base, as long as the gag works. The problem is that Austin Powers screwed everything up. He exploded the genre. Did I just say that? I did.
According to producer Michael G. Wilson, preliminary script work is scheduled to commence this month, so keep your eyes on CommanderBond.net for all the latest Bond 23 coverage as it becomes available.
Phenomenal first post.The Spy Who Fingered Me Twice
Thats an awesome postThe Spy Who Fingered Me Twice
I've read your response to my comment on Craig playing a thug-like Bond, and like I've said, Casino Royale is a great film and wonderfully acted by Craig, and I would really like it if his character is not named James Bond. Because that's how I feel, that he really doesn't played James Bond at all. Sure, the other actors played a brutal Bond, but the high class, sophisticated part of the Bond character is still there. I just don't see the point why do we need to see Bond without that part, when even in the CR novel, James Bond is not like what Craig portrays in the film.
Why, we have discussed it before and come to the conclusion that you dont like Craigs Bond while the rest of us love him,so why do we need to discuss it again??I'm reposting my comment here from the last thread for discussion's sake:
Further pressed for details she said, "Nothing... my lips are sealed. I can't tell you anything at all!"
"Of course, I'm looking forward hugely to working with Daniel [Craig] again and with Sam [Mendes] who I've only ever worked with in the theatre. So that'll be all good fun to do! I'm so glad it's coming back, it's wonderful."
And if you are wondering, Judi Dench will be back as M.
And if you are wondering, Judi Dench will be back as M.