Want to bet I can opinions and articles on the net that suggest otherwise?
I can get articles on the net that say the Holocaust is a creation of the Jews.
I measure intelligence not just in terms of education, but in terms of actual accomplishments and I think Bush competence has had more hits then misses. If someone has a great education, but can't run a business, how useful are they?
And Bush has not only an impressive bag of diplomas and success as Governor of Texas and was elected twice as President.
These are merely your pet theories, not facts.
Clinton leaving Bush a recession isn't a theory
The thing people will remember is how bad the state of affairs is at the end of the President's term, that may not be fair.
It's obviously not - but, again, thats why I don't take much stock into the approval rating as they leave office.
Of course I have seen no evidence that Bush is a military genius either.
I never claimed Bush was a military genius, but that's why he has people like Robert Gates and General Patereaus who are.
Considering the amount of political capital Bush was asking for in regards to this war, Bush not having all the pieces of the puzzle put together right away, means that people were going to lose faith in this project in short order and that's what happened. The war becoming unpopular was his fault and only his fault, getting his **** together 3 years later is too little, too late, he missed his chance.
Except that Iraqi is a success now...
Well its impossible to be wrong, all the time, that's just silly.
Not entirely.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
President's aren't clocks.
I never presented my theories as indisputable facts, you did, you treating your theory as indisputable, that's what I didn't like. I hate that kinda of attitude, its self rightous and arrogant and don't care if it comes from a left or right winger.
And I think you actually believe this which makes it doubly amusing.
But its not indisputable like you claimed it was, that makes your original statement arrogant in a unwarrented manner and I don't care that.
When did I call it indisputable?
You actively insulted me and called me an ignortant child, because I disagreed with it, you made it petty and personal, that is why I don't like your statements, that is a childish attitude.
If I insulted you by telling you to grow up, I am sorry, but I would still recommend it.
I didn't start with the personal insults because of it though.
Get some thicker skin.
That departemnt was controlled by Bish's officals when that report was released, still think your theory is an indisputable fact?
Again, as
Para said, the Federal Reserve is guilty of its own sin on the matter and thus there thoughts on the issue are not exactly final.
I never said it was, when did I say that, you did say it.
Frankly if you are going to be rude like, you better be damn sure your theory is fact, which it clearly isn't its theory.
You want me to treat you in an civil manner, act in a civil way, learn some manners and then I wil stop harping on this.
I treat intelligent and thoughtful opinions with the respect that should come with it - you simply have no prove deserving.
Again those are before age of information, now every blooper is on the net forever, that's why I don't think Bush will recover.
Give it time...give it time...
