Dread
TMNT 1984-2009
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2001
- Messages
- 21,788
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Hey, that's the jist I got from Newsarama about BLACK PANTHER #21. I haven't read it yet.Not Jake said:Oh so now superheroes have to all get on tv and announce their identities?Has anyone been forced to do that yet? Are you telling me that the press conference reveal is part of the law?
The reason "Not even COPS have to do that" is because not even superhumans have to do that.
And haven't you ever heard of a convict taking revenge on a cop? It's totally a Law & Order staple my man
And any story that makes a headline is a LAW & ORDER staple. Hell, that show has half as many spin-off's as the X-Men now.
My point is that in the MU, a superhero is probably a larger symbol in the public eye than the "official" peacekeepers like cops, soldiers, etc. That was part of why the SHRA was supposedly made, to unite both of those domains. Yes, yes, I know it's a security vs. liberty thing after Stamford, since ShadowBoxing thinks I don't get it. Why am I wrong when I say there are many "parts" to the concept of the SHRA and CW? Those layers help the story out and keep us debatin'. Cops rarely have supervillians that specifically target them the way many heroes do (nearly every hero could claim to have a "revenge squad" or enemy somewhere). Not saying their jobs would be any easier in MU, just stating that a hero is more in the public eye to begin with so demanding they reveal their ID's to the public along with the law places their families in jeopardy. It's still ironic that Spider-Man, and virtually no other major pro-SHRA hero or heroine, has a civilian family.
Has anyone been forced to do that yet? Are you telling me that the press conference reveal is part of the law?


t: