The Dark Knight The Dark Knight Fan Review Thread

How Do You Rate The Dark Knight?

  • 10 - The praise isn't a matter of hyperbole. Get your keister to the theater to see this NOW! :up:

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5 - We had to endure the boards crashing for this? :dry:

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1 - They should have stopped while they were ahead with Batman Begins. :down


Results are only viewable after voting.
great review man, but didnt you like eric roberts as maroni? i thought he did a fantastic job and had quite a few important lines "how many more people are gonna die untill you take off your mask"
 
great review man, but didnt you like eric roberts as maroni? i thought he did a fantastic job and had quite a few important lines "how many more people are gonna die untill you take off your mask"

Thanks. Yeah, he had great lines but delivered them like Wilkinson in Beings in my mind, which was almost mock-Sopranos parody. "...played golf with the mayor and 'tings like that." Made me cringe.
 
I think that this film was great and all but i think its been waay overstated,i know every one is entitled to opinion and respect each and every one...but it's been blown out of proportion..i went last night expecting to be blown away...and i simply wasn't..it was great don't get me wrong and hulk and iron man maybe just popcorn flicks..but i did enjoy hulk and IM more...heck i liked fantastic four 2 more...maybe cos i like the characters more i don't know...for me DC is superman...the others fill in around him (i know that'll be unpopular but its opinion..)i actually preferred superman returns to the dark knight...
That will upset some folk but batman was just too dark and downbeat with no glimmer of hope..i didnt leave with a be jokeresque smile on my face afterward like i did with the others..
 
yea thats your opinion man and i for one aint gonna bash it. but batman is SUPPOSED to be dark and gloomy, hes not really a hero hes a anti-hero. i liked ironman, infact i thought it was awesome but you cannot compare them sorta flicks to the dark knight, they might be based on comic books but to me they are in completely different genres. its like comparing ALIENS to ALIEN, same subject matter but completely different genres. and to be honest i found superman returns sooooo boring, so much can be done with a superhero with unlimited power but they just decided not to.
 
I think that this film was great and all but i think its been waay overstated,i know every one is entitled to opinion and respect each and every one...but it's been blown out of proportion..i went last night expecting to be blown away...and i simply wasn't..it was great don't get me wrong and hulk and iron man maybe just popcorn flicks..but i did enjoy hulk and IM more...heck i liked fantastic four 2 more...maybe cos i like the characters more i don't know...for me DC is superman...the others fill in around him (i know that'll be unpopular but its opinion..)i actually preferred superman returns to the dark knight...
That will upset some folk but batman was just too dark and downbeat with no glimmer of hope..i didnt leave with a be jokeresque smile on my face afterward like i did with the others..
i can see that. i guess that's a side effect of Nolan's hyper-realism, and Batman is a much darker character than everyone you mentioned. personally i was EXTREMELY disappointed in Superman Returns (or what i like to call Superman The Movie Redux) even with my already-mediocre expectations. and i'm suprised ANYONE would like FF2 over Batman.
 
yea thats your opinion man and i for one aint gonna bash it. but batman is SUPPOSED to be dark and gloomy, hes not really a hero hes a anti-hero. i liked ironman, infact i thought it was awesome but you cannot compare them sorta flicks to the dark knight, they might be based on comic books but to me they are in completely different genres. its like comparing ALIENS to ALIEN, same subject matter but completely different genres. and to be honest i found superman returns sooooo boring, so much can be done with a superhero with unlimited power but they just decided not to.

true...but again i love certain scenes in superman like the plane catching scene and just him whizzing around and stuff...i HATED the lois single mom thing and supermans son thing that needs a retcon now.

and i know batman is supposed to be dark and gloomy and does reflect the comics very well..maybe thats why im not as much a batman fan...i need the ray of light and hope thats why i love superman so much.

and as for FF2 i just thought it was a fun movie and i do love the FF alot..the chemistry with the thing and torch is great..the only down side to me for the film was galactus..
 
yea thats your opinion man and i for one aint gonna bash it. but batman is SUPPOSED to be dark and gloomy, hes not really a hero hes a anti-hero.
i dont really think of Batman as an anti-hero. I see Punisher, Jason Todd, maybe the Thunderbolts- people who may be doing "good" but in less than heroic ways or for the wrong reasons. but i don't Batman being compared to any of these people. he just has a tragic origin and its reflected in his actions.
 
I can understand that i watched The Incredibles yesterday and was reminded what an amazing film it is its just the right mix of fun and serious not all films have to be deadly serious and violent to be considered a classic in this genre.
 
and as for FF2 i just thought it was a fun movie and i do love the FF alot..the chemistry with the thing and torch is great..
that was the best part of both those movies. i feel that FF2 was actually an enjoyable popcorn movie, but the only things that make the first tolerable are Chris Evans and Michael Chiklis.
 
Anybody notice the formula that's developing with Nolan's films?
He's sticking to the 2-villains angle, with one villain living & 1 dying. And in every movie, we lose a piece of Batman iconography; first the Manor & the Batcave. Then the Batmobile & Bat-Signal. Kind of like the previous series, where Batman lost a vehicle in every movie.
 
And in every movie, we lose a piece of Batman iconography; first the Manor & the Batcave. Then the Batmobile & Bat-Signal.
im hoping all that means is in the next we'll see the rebuilt Wayne Manor and we'll get a real Batcave, and a sleaker (meaning not so many independent panels) Batmobile. and im willing to bet the Batsignal will return by the end of the next movie.
 
I work for a paper as a critic.
Here was my review as it appeared in print...

Agent of Change
The Dark Knight has changed things, forever

By now you have been told, comic enthusiast or not, to drop everything and see The Dark Knight, director Christopher Nolan’s sequel to his 2005 franchise-reviving Batman Begins. Early excitement for this film was forged not only by a brilliant viral marketing campaign but also by the tragic loss of Heath Ledger, who died in January of this year from an accidental prescription drug overdose. A week before the release, reviews started to trickle in, and the word was one of almost unanimous praise, touting the film as this generation’s Godfather II or Empire Strikes Back.

Although the comparison to the aforementioned films is a hyperbole-fueled stretch, that is not to take anything away from The Dark Knight. To be fair, if one reflects honestly, Coppola’s pacing issues and Lucas’ wooden dialogue reminds us that even Godfather II wasn’t GODFATHER II, nor was Empire the glorious second act that geeks around the globe would have you believe.

Picking up right after its vastly inferior predecessor left off, The Dark Knight shows us a Gotham that is down but not out, hoisting itself up after the wallop it received in the first film with the help of the Batman (Christian Bale). Aligned with Lieutenant Gordon (Gary Oldman) and new district attorney Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart), Batman now sets his sites on eradicating the mob. The crime-fighting trinity enjoys a modest win, even as they continue to feel one another out. Can a two-faced goody-goody from Internal Affairs really be as clean as Dent appears? Can a Lieutenant who hand-picked a questionable assortment of cops to fill his Major Crimes Unit truly be that blissfully ignorant of their past charges? Can a man dressed as a bat be anything other than absolutely out of his mind? Their friendship is a gamble that nearly pays off until the mob turns to a mysterious figure known as The Joker (Ledger).

Once unleashed, the Joker goes on a killing-spree of epic proportions, and the film’s remaining second and third acts jump ship from the sinking comic vessel. There is no microwave emitter that could destroy the city; no mind-altering machines need to be smashed. In fact, The Joker has no master plan. Plans are for schemers. “You had plans,” the Joker quips to a fallen foe. “Look where that got you.” Indeed, the film’s protagonists spend the remainder of the film trying to keep one another from being murdered. This isn’t so much Empire Strikes Back as it is Magnolia with the shark from Jaws unleashed in a melodramatic, self-obsessed world. This is a disaster movie leaps and bounds above The Day After Tomorrow or Armageddon, and Ledger’s Joker is the unparalleled wave of destruction. “This is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object,” he laments to Batman.

Near dissertations are being frantically scribbled about Ledger’s performance as the “agent of chaos,” and deservedly so. It is the performance of a lifetime: a sick and vile psychopath more gripping, more terrifying and perversely more real than Jack Nicholson’s infamous take on the iconic villain. There is only one moment in the entire picture that Nolan lets you remember that you are watching a fallen star. “We’re destined to do this forever,” Ledger says to Bale’s Batman, finally delivering to rabid fans that clear distinction of codependency so celebrated between the two in the comic books. It is impossible, however, to let this settle without thinking that this is the final Ledger-tackled Joker we will see.

Unfortunately, due to the tragedy, Ledger is the only one grabbing headlines, despite impressive turns from the supporting cast (Oldman particularly gives a knock-out performance as the very real Gordon) and Nolan’s impeccable vision. Far removed from Nolan’s own previous styling, this new Gotham is glass-covered, towering, magic-hour lit and heartbreakingly authentic. There is no falsely defaced architecture taking up space on a back lot somewhere in Burbank. This is Bale and Ledger pounding one another to a pulp on Chicago’s cleverly disguised pavements. This is as down and dirty as any episode of “The Wire.”

What has arrived is not the best film ever made, although I thought so moments after seeing the film. Nolan still has yet to master the ability to reel in an actor who is off the mark (such as Eric Roberts as Salvatore Maroni), and Bale’s Batman voice has gotten worse. But these minor infractions are nit-picks in the grand scheme of the unsettling morality play Nolan and company have crafted about the modern fear of terrorism. This is not a film to be easily shaken off. With its thematic struggle for the soul of a populous tittering on insanity and Ledger’s legendary performance, this is truly an experience that will haunt you for days to come.

Grade - A




This film will rank right up there with the other great sequels of all time without doubt... if it isn't already....trust me.

Godfather 2
Empire Strikes Back
Aliens
Terminator 2

and now THE DARK KNIGHT deserves to be named on that same list. No IFS' ANDS' or BUTS' about it!
 
I work for a paper as a critic.
Here was my review as it appeared in print...

Agent of Change
The Dark Knight has changed things, forever

By now you have been told, comic enthusiast or not, to drop everything and see The Dark Knight, director Christopher Nolan’s sequel to his 2005 franchise-reviving Batman Begins. Early excitement for this film was forged not only by a brilliant viral marketing campaign but also by the tragic loss of Heath Ledger, who died in January of this year from an accidental prescription drug overdose. A week before the release, reviews started to trickle in, and the word was one of almost unanimous praise, touting the film as this generation’s Godfather II or Empire Strikes Back.

Although the comparison to the aforementioned films is a hyperbole-fueled stretch, that is not to take anything away from The Dark Knight. To be fair, if one reflects honestly, Coppola’s pacing issues and Lucas’ wooden dialogue reminds us that even Godfather II wasn’t GODFATHER II, nor was Empire the glorious second act that geeks around the globe would have you believe.

Picking up right after its vastly inferior predecessor left off, The Dark Knight shows us a Gotham that is down but not out, hoisting itself up after the wallop it received in the first film with the help of the Batman (Christian Bale). Aligned with Lieutenant Gordon (Gary Oldman) and new district attorney Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart), Batman now sets his sites on eradicating the mob. The crime-fighting trinity enjoys a modest win, even as they continue to feel one another out. Can a two-faced goody-goody from Internal Affairs really be as clean as Dent appears? Can a Lieutenant who hand-picked a questionable assortment of cops to fill his Major Crimes Unit truly be that blissfully ignorant of their past charges? Can a man dressed as a bat be anything other than absolutely out of his mind? Their friendship is a gamble that nearly pays off until the mob turns to a mysterious figure known as The Joker (Ledger).

Once unleashed, the Joker goes on a killing-spree of epic proportions, and the film’s remaining second and third acts jump ship from the sinking comic vessel. There is no microwave emitter that could destroy the city; no mind-altering machines need to be smashed. In fact, The Joker has no master plan. Plans are for schemers. “You had plans,” the Joker quips to a fallen foe. “Look where that got you.” Indeed, the film’s protagonists spend the remainder of the film trying to keep one another from being murdered. This isn’t so much Empire Strikes Back as it is Magnolia with the shark from Jaws unleashed in a melodramatic, self-obsessed world. This is a disaster movie leaps and bounds above The Day After Tomorrow or Armageddon, and Ledger’s Joker is the unparalleled wave of destruction. “This is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object,” he laments to Batman.

Near dissertations are being frantically scribbled about Ledger’s performance as the “agent of chaos,” and deservedly so. It is the performance of a lifetime: a sick and vile psychopath more gripping, more terrifying and perversely more real than Jack Nicholson’s infamous take on the iconic villain. There is only one moment in the entire picture that Nolan lets you remember that you are watching a fallen star. “We’re destined to do this forever,” Ledger says to Bale’s Batman, finally delivering to rabid fans that clear distinction of codependency so celebrated between the two in the comic books. It is impossible, however, to let this settle without thinking that this is the final Ledger-tackled Joker we will see.

Unfortunately, due to the tragedy, Ledger is the only one grabbing headlines, despite impressive turns from the supporting cast (Oldman particularly gives a knock-out performance as the very real Gordon) and Nolan’s impeccable vision. Far removed from Nolan’s own previous styling, this new Gotham is glass-covered, towering, magic-hour lit and heartbreakingly authentic. There is no falsely defaced architecture taking up space on a back lot somewhere in Burbank. This is Bale and Ledger pounding one another to a pulp on Chicago’s cleverly disguised pavements. This is as down and dirty as any episode of “The Wire.”

What has arrived is not the best film ever made, although I thought so moments after seeing the film. Nolan still has yet to master the ability to reel in an actor who is off the mark (such as Eric Roberts as Salvatore Maroni), and Bale’s Batman voice has gotten worse. But these minor infractions are nit-picks in the grand scheme of the unsettling morality play Nolan and company have crafted about the modern fear of terrorism. This is not a film to be easily shaken off. With its thematic struggle for the soul of a populous tittering on insanity and Ledger’s legendary performance, this is truly an experience that will haunt you for days to come.

Grade - A

Nice :brucebat:
 
Yawn!

either debate on the review or dont post at all.

I was giving you some advice on getting people to debate your review's merits, tongue-in-cheek. If I have to decipher your grammar and spelling mistakes to try to understand what you're saying, it's tough to have any sort of meaningful discussion (not being totally sure what was meant).
 
I went and saw The Dark Knight today and I can't believe I almost went to see Hellboy 2 instead. The only thing I could say after seeing this movie to a curious mind was 'you gotta see this.'

I just got home from seeing it so it hasn't fully resonated in my brain yet, so, I'll say what I can while it's still fresh.

I never thought I would see a Batman/Superhero movie that was that serious, that dark, and that wicked. It took Batman Begins and added steroids, nitroglycerin, a jug of moonshine, and anything else flammable and completely blew it out of the water.

The only bad part about this movie was that Heath Ledger will not be able to reprise the role of the Joker in any future movies. I describe his interpretation of the Joker as Nicholson's Joker meets Hannibal Lecter. I won't say it's worthy of an Oscar nomination just yet but it does deserve consideration. I'd like to see it on DVD before I make that decision.

The supporting cast was very good but not great. Aaron Eckhart's supporting role was most outstanding and would have been a great villain in a sequel. The other members of the supporting cast all held their own and took nothing away from the overall presentation.

The only gripe I can see people having with this is the length, maybe it was one sequence too long but still phenomenal none the less. Something probably should have been ommited but I don't know what at this point.
 
I work for a paper as a critic.
Here was my review as it appeared in print...

Agent of Change
The Dark Knight has changed things, forever

By now you have been told, comic enthusiast or not, to drop everything and see The Dark Knight, director Christopher Nolan’s sequel to his 2005 franchise-reviving Batman Begins. Early excitement for this film was forged not only by a brilliant viral marketing campaign but also by the tragic loss of Heath Ledger, who died in January of this year from an accidental prescription drug overdose. A week before the release, reviews started to trickle in, and the word was one of almost unanimous praise, touting the film as this generation’s Godfather II or Empire Strikes Back.

Although the comparison to the aforementioned films is a hyperbole-fueled stretch, that is not to take anything away from The Dark Knight. To be fair, if one reflects honestly, Coppola’s pacing issues and Lucas’ wooden dialogue reminds us that even Godfather II wasn’t GODFATHER II, nor was Empire the glorious second act that geeks around the globe would have you believe.

Picking up right after its vastly inferior predecessor left off, The Dark Knight shows us a Gotham that is down but not out, hoisting itself up after the wallop it received in the first film with the help of the Batman (Christian Bale). Aligned with Lieutenant Gordon (Gary Oldman) and new district attorney Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart), Batman now sets his sites on eradicating the mob. The crime-fighting trinity enjoys a modest win, even as they continue to feel one another out. Can a two-faced goody-goody from Internal Affairs really be as clean as Dent appears? Can a Lieutenant who hand-picked a questionable assortment of cops to fill his Major Crimes Unit truly be that blissfully ignorant of their past charges? Can a man dressed as a bat be anything other than absolutely out of his mind? Their friendship is a gamble that nearly pays off until the mob turns to a mysterious figure known as The Joker (Ledger).

Once unleashed, the Joker goes on a killing-spree of epic proportions, and the film’s remaining second and third acts jump ship from the sinking comic vessel. There is no microwave emitter that could destroy the city; no mind-altering machines need to be smashed. In fact, The Joker has no master plan. Plans are for schemers. “You had plans,” the Joker quips to a fallen foe. “Look where that got you.” Indeed, the film’s protagonists spend the remainder of the film trying to keep one another from being murdered. This isn’t so much Empire Strikes Back as it is Magnolia with the shark from Jaws unleashed in a melodramatic, self-obsessed world. This is a disaster movie leaps and bounds above The Day After Tomorrow or Armageddon, and Ledger’s Joker is the unparalleled wave of destruction. “This is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object,” he laments to Batman.

Near dissertations are being frantically scribbled about Ledger’s performance as the “agent of chaos,” and deservedly so. It is the performance of a lifetime: a sick and vile psychopath more gripping, more terrifying and perversely more real than Jack Nicholson’s infamous take on the iconic villain. There is only one moment in the entire picture that Nolan lets you remember that you are watching a fallen star. “We’re destined to do this forever,” Ledger says to Bale’s Batman, finally delivering to rabid fans that clear distinction of codependency so celebrated between the two in the comic books. It is impossible, however, to let this settle without thinking that this is the final Ledger-tackled Joker we will see.

Unfortunately, due to the tragedy, Ledger is the only one grabbing headlines, despite impressive turns from the supporting cast (Oldman particularly gives a knock-out performance as the very real Gordon) and Nolan’s impeccable vision. Far removed from Nolan’s own previous styling, this new Gotham is glass-covered, towering, magic-hour lit and heartbreakingly authentic. There is no falsely defaced architecture taking up space on a back lot somewhere in Burbank. This is Bale and Ledger pounding one another to a pulp on Chicago’s cleverly disguised pavements. This is as down and dirty as any episode of “The Wire.”

What has arrived is not the best film ever made, although I thought so moments after seeing the film. Nolan still has yet to master the ability to reel in an actor who is off the mark (such as Eric Roberts as Salvatore Maroni), and Bale’s Batman voice has gotten worse. But these minor infractions are nit-picks in the grand scheme of the unsettling morality play Nolan and company have crafted about the modern fear of terrorism. This is not a film to be easily shaken off. With its thematic struggle for the soul of a populous tittering on insanity and Ledger’s legendary performance, this is truly an experience that will haunt you for days to come.

Grade - A

Great review except the the boldface...you can't have this movie without that one and vastly inferior is making it sound like Batman Begins sucked.;)
 
I think that this film was great and all but i think its been waay overstated,i know every one is entitled to opinion and respect each and every one...but it's been blown out of proportion..i went last night expecting to be blown away...and i simply wasn't..it was great don't get me wrong and hulk and iron man maybe just popcorn flicks..but i did enjoy hulk and IM more...heck i liked fantastic four 2 more...maybe cos i like the characters more i don't know...for me DC is superman...the others fill in around him (i know that'll be unpopular but its opinion..)i actually preferred superman returns to the dark knight...
That will upset some folk but batman was just too dark and downbeat with no glimmer of hope..i didnt leave with a be jokeresque smile on my face afterward like i did with the others..

I agree.

I also enjoy SR (and even STM) much more than TDK. I think it has to do with the fact that I'm not really a fan of Batman, I just don't relate to him much. I think the character is too dark and downbeat, like you said, for me as well. The only think that I really loved from this film was Ledger's joker, but several things let me down a bit, such as the generic score like in BB (again), the repetitive and annoying speeches, and the action was better than Begins, but I was expecting more from Batman's fighting skills, which were not exciting or dynamic enough for me. IMO, Nolan needs to learn about subtlety for his Batman films.

Oh, and Magi (Rachel) was to ugly to play Rachel Dawes, imo, and it was distracting.
 
yea while i really really like ironman, it was just a action flick. TDK is soooo much more. and hulk? i was really dissapointed in that, i usually like ed norton and tim roth but neither really put in a great perfomance. and it was just boring i felt.

I'm sorry. I thought this was the "Review Dark Knight" thread, not the "Let's trash every other superhero movie in order to uplift Dark Knight" thread.
 
Oh, and Magi (Rachel) was to ugly to play Rachel Dawes, imo, and it was distracting.

When and where has it been established that Rachel is supposed to be beautiful in order to be portrayed right?
 
Mini review posted in some other thread:

Having Watched Batman Begins I was a little disappointed with how the movie went completely down hill the final third of the movie.
Bale looked very uncomfortable in the Begins suit and the Fighting/action sequences were pretty much garbage.
So I never cared to follow TDK all I knew was Heath Ledger was going to be the Joker but having watched the movie I was pleasantly surprised at how beautiful it is.

For once we got a batman Movie with Batman actually able to move freely without restraint and fight.
The Final scene with Gordon giving that speech and Batman being chased by the police dogs was epic.
I never re watched a movie twice in the theatre.
10/10
It belongs in the top 5 movies ever made.
 
I'm sorry. I thought this was the "Review Dark Knight" thread, not the "Let's trash every other superhero movie in order to uplift Dark Knight" thread.

im not trashing other movies, someone said they prefered hulk and ironman to TDK and im just giving my opinion on why i like TDK more. go eat a toilet brush.
 
The comparisons of THE DARK KNIGHT to SUPERMAN RETURNS is interesting. I do understand the appeal of SR. I just took my dad to see TDK and he didn't seem to like it much, but really enjoyed SR!

SR just didn't work for me. Not like the first couple of Christopher Reeve films, and certainly not like the Nolan Batman films. But I think it has more to do with the fact the sets didn't really look authentic and Kate Bosworth was unconvincing as Lois Lane as well as one or two other problems.

It's too bad my dad didn't like TDK. I kept hearing him sigh a various times during the showing. He later told me he doesn't like Bale. Doesn't think Bale is "right" for Bruce Wayne/Batman. I, of course, disagreed with him vehemently!
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,272
Messages
22,077,858
Members
45,878
Latest member
Remembrance1988
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"