Love the phalynx Ultron....I just want the goddamn butterfly mouth
^That's pretty awesome.
I haven't been keeping track of every little tidbit of info, I try to stay away from spoilers, but I will ask, is it confirmed that Tony is the creator of Ultron? I don't recall seeing that. Just that Hank Pym would NOT be in the movie. Are we assuming that because Pym is not in the movie, and Tony is the "posterboy" of the MCU (which I do not agree with, Avengers did a fairly good job of showing that every character is important to the team).
I know some people are upset because there is no Pym, and they say it defeats the purpose of having Ultron at all, that Ultron is the crux of Pym's character, and vice-versa.
But concerning only Ultron, wouldn't his origin be just as effective without Pym? He is created by an Avenger, he turns, said-Avenger faces guilt, Ultron inevitably has "Daddy-issues", etc. And wouldn't it be more interesting as a film if the character who is behind Ultron's creation is one we are already emotionally involved in, compared to a character that would have to be introduced just to make "that mistake" that defines him?
I do like those Jarvis ideas, that could be a cool scenario for the movie, but I don't think it will be the final product.
So basically from Iron Man armors to the version that we knowWhedon said that we will see him evolve so he will have more than 1 form. The last one seen in the movie will probably be the classic version.
Don't know why but this sounded REALLY good to meIf they do use JARVIS as the base for ULTRON id love to hear JARVIS say "im sorry sir" with as much emotion as an AI can have and then show a clearly emotionally affected Tony before **** hits the fan
It's not been confirmed, just an educated guess at this point. Though, even if Tony isn't the creator, you can bet he'll have an important role, since he's the "tech guy".^That's pretty awesome.
I haven't been keeping track of every little tidbit of info, I try to stay away from spoilers, but I will ask, is it confirmed that Tony is the creator of Ultron? I don't recall seeing that. Just that Hank Pym would NOT be in the movie. Are we assuming that because Pym is not in the movie, and Tony is the "posterboy" of the MCU (which I do not agree with, Avengers did a fairly good job of showing that every character is important to the team).
Potentially, yes, but IMO he just wouldn't be the same if his "father" doesn't have crippling self-esteem issues. None of the existing MCU Avengers have that (maybe Banner?). The dynamic would certainly be different, or at least, not as intense, but it wouldn't necessarily be bad.I know some people are upset because there is no Pym, and they say it defeats the purpose of having Ultron at all, that Ultron is the crux of Pym's character, and vice-versa.
But concerning only Ultron, wouldn't his origin be just as effective without Pym? He is created by an Avenger, he turns, said-Avenger faces guilt, Ultron inevitably has "Daddy-issues", etc. And wouldn't it be more interesting as a film if the character who is behind Ultron's creation is one we are already emotionally involved in, compared to a character that would have to be introduced just to make "that mistake" that defines him?
I do like those Jarvis ideas, that could be a cool scenario for the movie, but I don't think it will be the final product.
What if J.A.R.V.I.S. is a copy of a REAL Jarvis? How do you think that guy feels lol talk about selling your soul to corporate lolYeah same here. It would get much more emotional if Jarvis was taken over/killed by Ultron. I would probably cry lol.