saiyanaida
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2009
- Messages
- 175
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Lerman told MTV a few weeks back that he knew nothing about anything and had not been contacted by Sony. Everyone on here got sad then. Now it seems he auditioned.
Aaron yes. Anton looks nothing like Peter Parker.
If Aaron or Lerman get it, I will be happy.
Aaron yes. Anton looks nothing like Peter Parker.
If Aaron or Lerman get it, I will be happy.
In terms of looks AND talent. Lerman doesn't even come close.
lerman said he had heard nothing since, not that he hadn't been contacted
exactly, Tobey for one looked nothing like my image of Parker, i always imagien him with more "edged" features not so much round onesI'll never understand this "Doesn't look like Peter Parker" thing.
Does Peter Parker really have that much of a rigid, defined "look" for one actor to be so much more suited for the part? It's not about look. It's about the characteristics. Peter Parker is supposed to be a geek. A dweeb. The kind of kid who when people insinuate that he may in fact be Spider-Man, it's a joke.
Anton looks enough like Parker for it not to bug me, considering the fact that his personality embodies the character.
Since it looks as if the new films will be based in the Ultimate Universe, yes. One artist defined the look of Peter there.
I'll never understand this "Doesn't look like Peter Parker" thing.
Does Peter Parker really have that much of a rigid, defined "look" for one actor to be so much more suited for the part? It's not about look. It's about the characteristics. Peter Parker is supposed to be a geek. A dweeb. The kind of kid who when people insinuate that he may in fact be Spider-Man, it's a joke.
Then this brings up the Glover for Spider-Man defense again.
Naturally. It's a drastic change from our "classical" interpretation of the character. I wouldn't defend it, though, simply because I don't think Glover can play a high school kid.
So?
Even if they do explicitly go out of their way to base it on USM, who cares if Peter Parker doesn't have the exact same haircut, built, and weight?
"Defined" is a stretch. When people picture Peter Parker as a solitary character, there is no one definitive look. Some like S: TAS Peter, some like Tobey, some like USM, some like ASM, some like Spectacular, and it goes on.
Even if you're doing a straight up adaptation of USM, there's absolutely no reason to go out of your way to make sure the character looks 115% like the exact drawings. IMO, that's an archaic way of thinking through a comic adapation.
Hugh Jackman was significantly taller than comic Wolverine. But now he's the most iconic Marvel movie character to date. Does it really matter?
I lol at the folks who honestly think this will be a page for page adaptation of USM.
Who said this will be a "page for page adaptation of USM?" I LOL at people that can't remember what people actually post before posting themselves.
Yelchin may have been smirky/witty in Charlie Bartlett but he has also played reserved characters and he himself is a very reserved person. Lerman hasn't been in a role that called for him to be smirky/witty so he may be the perfect Peter Parker for all we know. He certainly looks the part. Aaron also is a good Peter Parker and Kick Ass showed that but he is a bit too old and if this series is high school based, will Aaron look that young 9 years from now when he is 30?