It looks decent. I was hoping they'd go full on black and white until he sees color
[YT]iJNNugNe0Wo[/YT]
I haven't read the book but I read somewhere that the boy was supposed to be 11 or 12. It's obvious they aged him up to 16 or 17 because they are trying to reach a certain demographic with the film. Further more the aesthetics look awfully familar as Octoberist just pointed out. I'm not close enough to the material to find the situation to be anything but humorous.
If it's a best selling classic, why not follow the book as closely as possible and differentiate your film from others by having a non teen lead?
Ah the latest attempt to turn a young adult novel into a movie (franchise?), they bagged Meryl Streep and Jeff Bridges at least.
Very low tech. Very Logan's Run was it not
I really should read the book.The fact that he's 12, right at the onset of puberty, is also fairly important to the story and particularly to its themes. Also, aging up the character takes away some of what made the society in the book so interesting, as 12 was when your adult role was assigned.