The Great Irony in Smallville

Batgort

Civilian
Joined
Aug 22, 2005
Messages
374
Reaction score
0
Points
11
After watching Shattered, I've been looking back at the seasons of Smallville and how Clark was driven to be a hero, and Lex was driven to be a villian. The irony is not that friends became enemies, but that their fathers were like an inverse of each other and the failings of the other father, created them.

Take Lex, a young man troubled by a father constantly instilling him with distrust and tests to prime him as a CEO figure. Lionel was full of distrust, leaving a void of friendship and family that Lex searched out for and found Clark.

On the other hand, Clark is filled with the family values that Jonathan and Martha instilled in him, but became very distrusting of others in the name of protecting his secret. In this sense, Jonathan is the inverse of Lionel - mostly filled with love and family values, but has a distrusting and paranoid side.

At any point in the entire series where Clark and Lex would converge into a good friendship, neither fully evil nor fully heroic, their fathers almost always result in forging the wedge between them. How many times have you said, "If Clark only told Lex the truth, he could have saved their friendship and brought Lex into the light" and then watched Clark not help Lex due to guidance by Jonathan. Or the reverse, Lex having the capability to do something good, but being selfish in his quest for power, like Lionel.

Whenever Lional acts friendly towards Clark, his distrust (inspired by Jonathan) usually drives him to be more heroic and find out what's going on. Whenever Jonathan acts un-friendly towards Lex, his void of family drives him to be hurt and vengeful, taking him down the path of evil. In the end, Clark strives for good, but often ends up hurting others (e.g. Lana), and Lex does the same (e.g. striving to protect america), but hurting others through his evil means.

So, I submit to you, the great irony in Smallville is how the legacy of a good family can inadvertantly create a villian, and the legacy of an evil family can inadvertantly create a hero, and the ultimate balance between the two.

P.S. Of course at this point, the series has advanced to the point where the characters on the verge of becoming a fully fledged hero or villian. The last glimmers of anything else are quickly vanishing (e.g. the scenes in Nemesis between Clark and Lex).
 
They should change the shows name to

Ironyville

:cwink:
 
What a really interesting post. I love the parallels you discuss in regards to Lionel and Jonathan. The father/son dynamics on this show are clearly purposeful, and I think, very well done. What better way to illustrate why these two men become who they will than by showing the natures of the men who raised them.

At any point in the entire series where Clark and Lex would converge into a good friendship, neither fully evil nor fully heroic, their fathers almost always result in forging the wedge between them. How many times have you said, "If Clark only told Lex the truth, he could have saved their friendship and brought Lex into the light" and then watched Clark not help Lex due to guidance by Jonathan. Or the reverse, Lex having the capability to do something good, but being selfish in his quest for power, like Lionel.

That bit I don't really agree with. I think that Lex always looked at Clark as a light that could save him from himself, and he even put that notion onto a very receptive Clark as well, but IMO, it was nothing more than a futile dream. Lex's nature combined with his upbringing were already set too hard and fast to be changed by the friendship of a good man. It's a great idea, but I don't believe Clark could have saved Lex because the bottom line is that Lex does not WANT to be saved - as evidenced by the choices he makes. Lillian tried to get Lex to make different choices, to take different paths, but he consistently chooses not to.

The notion that Clark could have saved Lex implies a certain amount of blame on Clark's part for not doing so, and I just don't buy that at all. Although, I'm sure Clark does to a certain extent because he's just that kinda guy - he feels responsibility for Lex, just as he does for everyone.
 
I think Jonathan's death was the gateway for Clark to become the hero that we know in the future. As good of a father Jonathan was, he was the major reason why Clark didn't accept his Kryptonian heritage at first.(Even though Jonathan was only protecting Clark due to Jor-el's ambiguous behavior)
 
Great post. Serene has a point even because we don't know for sure if Lex was ever really friends with Clark. Remember in Vessel when he said he wanted everything Clark had from the start ?
 
Great post. Serene has a point even because we don't know for sure if Lex was ever really friends with Clark. Remember in Vessel when he said he wanted everything Clark had from the start ?
I don't really remember the way that line was delivered, but I always bought their friendship (until it began to deteriorate, of course). I think Lex 'wanting everything Clark has' reflects his desire to have had a solid family unit, with loving parents and friends who genuinely liked him for who he was, rather than his last name. Given the type of upbringing he had, that admiration (perhaps even envy) would be natural. Remember the episode (Truth ?) where Lex was talking to Chloe and admitted that he wanted Lionel to say that he loved him? Granted, he inevitably chose to follow a dark path, I believe there was some sincerity there early on.
 
Great post! I believe Lex was doomed from the start. Let's say Clark did reveal his secret, do you think at some point (Senetor, President)Lex would not grow jealous of Clarks world admiration. Lex could be a great man, but he would never be a Superman and that's just not good enough.
 
At any point in the entire series where Clark and Lex would converge into a good friendship, neither fully evil nor fully heroic, their fathers almost always result in forging the wedge between them. How many times have you said, "If Clark only told Lex the truth, he could have saved their friendship and brought Lex into the light" and then watched Clark not help Lex due to guidance by Jonathan. Or the reverse, Lex having the capability to do something good, but being selfish in his quest for power, like Lionel.

Good post, but I don't agree with this statement either. Even at their closest, Lex wasn't someone to be trusted with that information. Even while he was 'good' he was still someone who always tried to get what he wanted, and it would be inevitable that if he knew about Clark's powers, he would almost certainly exploit them at some point. But that's just the vibe I got from him.
 
Good post, but I don't agree with this statement either. Even at their closest, Lex wasn't someone to be trusted with that information. Even while he was 'good' he was still someone who always tried to get what he wanted, and it would be inevitable that if he knew about Clark's powers, he would almost certainly exploit them at some point. But that's just the vibe I got from him.


You only have to look as far as Asylum to understand what Lex would have done with the knowledge of Clark's powers. He wanted to use Clark to help him break out of the Asylum.

Emphasis on the word USE.
 
How dare Lex ask Clark for help in escaping from a mental institution and bring his grand parents murderers to justice. How dare he!

Seriously Asylum is the worse episode to use considering that he knew his father was obsessed by Clark and even hinting that he new his secret would have saved him from being fried, but he didn't. Plus even when he was being dragged to be fried his only concern was Clark.
 
Seriously Asylum is the worse episode to use considering that he knew his father was obsessed by Clark and even hinting that he new his secret would have saved him from being fried, but he didn't. Plus even when he was being dragged to be fried his only concern was Clark.

Yeah, but that was only after Clark agreed to help him escape. When Clark originally said no, Lex was outraged and lashed out at him. Lex only cared for Clark when Clark came back to break him out. As long as Lex gets what he wants, then Lex is your friend. You dont go along with him then he turns on you.

Ask Duncan.
 
Yeah but Clark also said no straight after Lex took his medication, you know the medication designed to make him act crazy and out of character.

As for duncan all Lex actually did was beat him up. I saw plenty of fights just like that when I was in school. A young boy letting out all his rage at being bullied on the wrong person happens all the time. I doubt the all the guys I seen do that will grow up to be heartless killers.
 
Yeah but Clark also said no straight after Lex took his medication, you know the medication designed to make him act crazy and out of character.

He didnt take those pills. He dropped them into the paint.

As for duncan all Lex actually did was beat him up. I saw plenty of fights just like that when I was in school. A young boy letting out all his rage at being bullied on the wrong person happens all the time. I doubt the all the guys I seen do that will grow up to be heartless killers.

What Lex did to Duncan was extremely violent and more aggressive than the usual school yard rough and tumble. However, the point is that Duncan and Lex were "friends" and Lex turned on Duncan when Duncan wouldnt go along with Lex's plan.
 
He didnt take those pills. He dropped them into the paint.

Fair enough but it still an extreme stituation. Is it any different to any time Chloe calls Clark for help, or his mother, father or Pete did it?

What Lex did to Duncan was extremely violent and more aggressive than the usual school yard rough and tumble. However, the point is that Duncan and Lex were "friends" and Lex turned on Duncan when Duncan wouldnt go along with Lex's plan.

Its really not, the guy was able to immediately stand, walk and talk all on his own. In most fights in the schools one guy usually can't do that. Besides how often have we heard Lex refer to Clark as the only real friend he's had, the whole Duncan storyline doesn't seem to fit either Lex's character or his history. Why did he never mention him before? Why did Lionel not? Every other tradegy in his life was mentioned and explored and then they just threw this out there.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"