Im really loathe to chime in on something that just boils down to a personality conflict. But it seems like, if both "Azaleas" were signed to Interscope/Def Jam (or whatever branch of that tree that exists under Universal Music) and at one pointfor whatever reason, justified or notthat Ms. Iggy received the priority stamp in terms of marketing and promotion, while Ms. Bankslike various other signed artistsfound her records being shelved for one financial quarter after another, which apparently ended up being years in length. I know that Nicole Scherzinger from the Pussycat Dolls has been promising her solo LP since what, 2009? Fergie just now has a single out after her last solo work was, what, 2008?
Even in this era of people being able to upload singles and albums online for much less in cost than it would take to press up CDs and vinyl, the major labels still often move like dinosaurs, internally. Ill stop short of endorsing any sweeping, inflammatory comments, but I can only speculate that its probably frustrating on some level to be a signed artist but to be more or less forced to bootleg your own material to have something tactile to offer at concerts (aside from T-shirts and whatever else.) Dr. Dre's Aftermath Entertainment (linked to Universal for marketing/distribution) became notorious for having several high-profile signings (King Tee, Busta Rhymes, Raekwon, Rakim), but if your name wasn't Eminem, 50 Cent, or Kendrick Lamar, it probably didn't come out.
I go back to the Beastie Boys and Third Bass, so white rappers are old news to methat is, not shocking, not strange. Of course, Im also mindful that the infrastructure of the recording industry is what it isnot especially diverse, and putting bottom line before social value. So the rise in certain types of rap isnt surprising to me anymore, as infuriating as it often is. The geographic and racial diversity of artists is growing, which is good. The gender diversity has stagnated, which is bad. Thematic diversity remains the final frontier.