That'd still be an interesting idea to explore, imo. But instead of the brother/sister nonsense, have it be a surviving victim of the Shape that he goes after again in an asylum. Would be perfect.
Each to their own, to this day RZHII is the biggest piece of **** I've ever sat through at the cinema.
Each to their own, to this day RZHII is the biggest piece of **** I've ever sat through at the cinema.
I thought the hospital scene was pretty well done. The rest of the movie got progressively worse until it turned into straight garbage.
Ok....can someone explain to me why everyone is so gaga over It Follows? My goodness, the movie was a CHORE to get through. See, I dont mind slowly paced films, but if you're gonna be slow paced then the actors onscreen better be damn compelling enough for me to wanna watch and follow them. Every actor in this movie was wooden and talked like stilted robots, so i couldnt get invested in them. If they had actually acted like real people, I might have enjoyed watching these characters but damn, the plank wood acting coupled with the pacing made this rough for me.
The score was awesome though. Lol
If Follows has other qualities but there are a lot of indie horror movies that skate by on synth score. People have a Pavlovian nostalgia response and a lot of very lazy movies get a lot of praise.
THANK YOU. I mean, yeah i love 80s synth too and It Follows has a GREAT score but the movie was giving me nothing to work with. Like I said, slow paced films are fine so long as the characters and dialogue are engaging (see: pretty much every Tarantino film). But these actors were literally giving me nothing to make me care about them. Have people become so jaded by modern "jump scare" horror films that they grasp onto literay anything that deviates from it?
Call it weird, but I saw It Follows in a theater, and despite its flaws, enjoyed it. Maybe it was that openness, but it really unsettled me. Not sure home can replicate that feeling.I was massively disapointed with It Follows, I think for me the worst thing was the lack of consistency with whatever 'IT' was. Like if it can disguise itself as anyone why doesn't it always disguise itself as a relative or friend? Or why it doesn't go after that one guy for like a week? Also why does the first guy who has 'IT' following him go on a date to the cinema ? He'd be trapped there, etc. I also found the CG in the film to be some of the wurst I've seen. I'm often quite forgiving of poor effects but I honestly think I could have done some better CG than what they did. Lastly too I was mostly bored, I am all for a slower paced movies but at least give us interesting characters. I didn't see a single interesting character in the film so the slow pace didn't work for me.
Call it weird, but I saw It Follows in a theater, and despite its flaws, enjoyed it. Maybe it was that openness, but it really unsettled me. Not sure home can replicate that feeling.
Yeah that was scene was alright, stick some classic John Carpenter score there and I would probably like that scene more.
Speaking of which, did anyone here bring up the fact that he's said that he's involved in making the next one?
I thought the hospital scene was pretty well done. The rest of the movie got progressively worse until it turned into straight garbage.
Any fans of Creepshow 2 here? I know it's inferior to the original but it's a cult classic and I think the films issues (which come down to budget) are a part of its charm.
Any fans of Creepshow 2 here? I know it's inferior to the original but it's a cult classic and I think the films issues (which come down to budget) are a part of its charm.