Fact is, the trailer needed at least one kick ass looking action scene. The fact that is didn't have one is beyond strange.will there be action?
because this was 100% build up and no money shots.i dont remember the last time a studio was that dumb.
i think i will watch the movie only for the concept(kids fighting) and Jennifer. visuals look boring and i dont know if there is any action
no that is pretty dumbdid you not read the statement by Lionsgate? They specifically said this all footage from the first half of the movie. All the action is in the second half. That is a bold move not dumb.
why would you be bold when marketing a big budget franshise? what would you get out of it ? you lose money and you lose people in the theater.did you not read the statement by Lionsgate? They specifically said this all footage from the first half of the movie. All the action is in the second half. That is a bold move not dumb.
Since the books aren't supposed to be a Twilight type thing I was expecting action in the trailer. If Twilight put "action" scenes in it's trailer in 2008.why would you be bold when marketing a big budget franshise? what would you get out of it ? you lose money and you lose people in the theater.
Hunger Games fans are not going to make a profit. the general public will. i am not saying that you need to show the whole movie. but to not sow anything from the forest fights? that is dumb.
the 60 second summer teaser had more action. do you understand what i wrotte here? a 60 second summer teaser had more action then a 2 minute full trailer .
]Yeah I can't help but to think of Battle Royale while watching the trailer.[/B] Hopefully it turns out good.
we need more well-written female action heroes. so i am happy about this movie.
what brat
are you referring to josh hutcherson?
he looks quite good here