Marvin
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2003
- Messages
- 19,564
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
This is typical Paramount bungling, though. The studio isn't very good at marketing films it distributes and as a result has only had one legit $1 billion earner of its own. The Avengers and Iron Man 3 may have the Paramount logo out front, but their stellar marketing jobs were entirely down to Disney's efforts. Contrast the performances of those two films with the Marvel Studios films that Paramount was responsible for marketing and the differences in the quality of of the PR work becomes glaringly obvious.
This is one of the most unfair observations I've seen lately. If I were to follow with an equally obtuse statement it would be that, Avengers and Disney owe their financial success entirely to the work and gamble paramount took early on.
I hope people don't make similar grandiose statements about how much Better StarWars does at Disney than it did during the 70's.
Speaking of Disney, do people here think the failings of John Carter and Tron 3 are above the faults of the marketing? Just seems after Joss Whedon, there has been alot of revisionist history going around.