The Tomatometer works on a subjective scale based on whether they recommend it or not. So as a critic who is being objective, they gave it a 7/10, but on their subjective side, they don't recommend it, cause they didn't enjoy it, so it gets a rotten.
That makes more sense. Thanks for the info.
Agreed. Dan and Roth are some of my favourite critics to listen to and they had an interesting review that I recommend rest of yall watch.
Wish you guys spoke spanish so you could hear some youtube reviews from some guys i follow. Almost all of them called it 5/5 and said it's an horror movie.
When that review was posted yesterday it was a fresh, but it's been changed to a rotten today for some reason.
A film about being inside the jokers head, I think, needs to feel like a horror film.
Sure it does, which is why I explained how or why it happens. And this isn’t even close to the first time something like that has happened. It’s up the critic on whether they want it fresh or rotten. There’s no objective barometer on RT that says if you review a movie over 6/10, it must be labeled fresh.
) But in this scenario, the two numerical scores would have two separate Tomato designations - one fresh, one rotten. What doesn’t make sense is to have a single numerical score that’s conspicuously at odds with the Tomato.
