when the USSR launches a nuclear warhead called Coldbringer in response to Superman's presence in Corto Maltese. Superman manages to divert the missile to an uninhabited desert area before it detonates, but damage is done nonetheless. The warhead was designed to disrupt all electronics and communications in the Western Hemisphere as well as throw millions of tons of dust and debris into the atmosphere. Deprived of the sunlight that gives him his powers, Superman is nearly consumed by his own hypermetabolism. Gotham descends almost immediately into chaos as the blackout hits, with rioting and looting rocking the city. An airplane crippled by the electromagnetic pulse crashes into a building, feeding the panic. A few citizens, including Jim Gordon, pull together to fight the fires and retain some semblance of civilization until the power is restored.
Rynan said:My money, he'll be robbing and murdering his way around Gotham, fufilling his peverse desire to propagate crime and terror within the city and causing a backlash among Gothamites toward Batman, whose apperance they blame for this escallation in these "super criminals". Batman(and the law officals who support him) will be forced not only to deal with The Joker's rampage, but also the public as well, not to mention the police's efforts to capture him.
But, of course, The Joker will be the real ringmaster behind the chaos.
lujho said:How about NO grand 'plot', thank you very much.
Real criminal psychos don't have plots - they just do what they do.
Just have Joker killing of numerous individuals for his own perverse reasons. Actually, I think Ledger or Nolan was talking about the comic Joker being the predecessor to the modern serial killer who announces his crimes... someone like the Zodiac killer in the 70s. That sounds good to me.
And he *should* use some kind of "laugh yourself to death" chemical because it's such a horrific image and horrible way to die. Gas, injection, whatever. Not releasing HUGE clouds of it over the whole city but using it on a one-to-one basis. Keep it small.
Remember that scene in Mask of the Phantasm where a guy has been joker-gassed and he's just laughing and crying at the same time? Brilliant animation and voice-acting there - you can see the outright despair and madness in the guy, he so desperately wants to stop laughing but the more he tries the more he laughs. Tears are streaming from his eyes. Not not use that kind of scene would be a damn shame. They can make it that the actual death is caused by not being able to breath or something.
So yeah. No huge, stupid, city-wide plots of mass destruction. It's been ****ing done to death. It's cliched, conventional, we've seen it 5 times before (and that's just in Batman movies... not to mention most other SUperhero movies and lots of other movies). It's silly. Give me a different kind of villain.
lujho said:How about NO grand 'plot', thank you very much.
Real criminal psychos don't have plots - they just do what they do.
Just have Joker killing of numerous individuals for his own perverse reasons. Actually, I think Ledger or Nolan was talking about the comic Joker being the predecessor to the modern serial killer who announces his crimes... someone like the Zodiac killer in the 70s. That sounds good to me.
And he *should* use some kind of "laugh yourself to death" chemical because it's such a horrific image and horrible way to die. Gas, injection, whatever. Not releasing HUGE clouds of it over the whole city but using it on a one-to-one basis. Keep it small.
Remember that scene in Mask of the Phantasm where a guy has been joker-gassed and he's just laughing and crying at the same time? Brilliant animation and voice-acting there - you can see the outright despair and madness in the guy, he so desperately wants to stop laughing but the more he tries the more he laughs. Tears are streaming from his eyes. Not to use that kind of scene would be a damn shame. They can make it that the actual death is caused by not being able to breathe or something.
So yeah. No huge, stupid, city-wide plots of mass destruction. It's been ****ing done to death. It's cliched, conventional, we've seen it 5 times before (and that's just in Batman movies... not to mention most other superhero movies and lots of other movies). It's silly. Give me a different kind of villain.
COMPO said:what do you think Joker's pan will be? Joker being the main villian will have a plan that will destroy Gotham or cause mass chaos? And i have a feeling it'll have something to do with the arms deal? What do you think?
lujho said:"Chaos" is too strong a word for me. It should be the same thing that London experienced with the Ripper, or San Francisco with Zodiac.
Not fun at all... but not exactly "chaos". "Chaos" is such a huge and over-the-top and well... comic-booky motivation for a villain. I think Ra's Al Ghul is the only villain who should want to cause a HUGE chaos-inducing event, and frankly I think they should have built up to that over a few films.
IAmTheKnight said:I really want to see a combination of the escalation and mob war angles. The balance is already upset with Falcone out of commission, and then the Joker comes on the scene and starts trying to take over. And, yes, the laughing gas should be used on a one-on-one basis.
HR-PUFF&STUFF said:this is what the movie will be about.
The Question said:But The Joker isn't a mobster.
The Question said:But The Joker isn't a mobster.