nickyg641
Mah dogsss are HONGREHHH!
- Joined
- May 11, 2007
- Messages
- 1,807
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Two words:More like, "HAHA our film is better, we respect the source material and don't kill off the most famous villain in the comic book world."
Two-Face
No because only fanboys have to connect everything.
BATMAN WEARS A SUIT!!! IT'S SPOOFING 89!!
Yeah, because rooftop climaxes involving the Joker tumbling off, and Batman shooting a cord around his ankle happen all the time in the comics, right?
That's exactly how I want to see it, withI agree at this point, but I will have to see how it plays out.
Since Two Face is out of the picture, I really like the idea of introducing some new villains to the screen, and possibly using the Joker as some sort of overarching force working from inside Arkham.
the Joker escaping at some point in the film, perhaps in a way reminiscent of Hannibal Lecter's escape.
He doesn't necessarily have to be a villain, more of just a threat that Batman must face, emotionally and literally. I just pray the reports aren't true, or that somehow it's left ambiguous.But he's not a villain in Nolan's world.
Otherwise, I just can't figure out why, after keeping Scarecrow and Joker alive, they would kill off Two-Face after thirty minutes. I can see a lot of potential, involving Batman having to go through the emotional struggle of bringing down someone he considered to be his friend, and trying to rehabilitate him, that's possibly been wasted.