Sequels The "Milo Ventimiglia as Peter Parker" Thread

NinjaCarm

Fantastic
Joined
Nov 28, 2003
Messages
3,341
Reaction score
0
Points
31
450px-Milo_Ventimiglia2C_2006.jpg
[/IMG]

It's time for a change in the Spider-Man movies. Off with Maguire, off with Dunst, off with Raimi. You had a pretty darn good run, but there are other incarnations of Peter Parker / Spider-Man out there in the comics history other than being a puss ass all the time and having an unsarcastic Spider-Man.

I personally believe, this guy has Peter Parker written all over him. No brokeback mountain Jake Gyllanhaul, no weary eyed beaten up face Joseph Levitt whoever, this guy has the look, and I think he can pull off the more confident wise ass Peter Parker / Spider-Man that its time for.

Anyone agree...?
 
Hmmm i'll admit....hes not a bad choice..I could definilty see him in the role. Plus hes a lot better choice than someone like Shia LaBeouf
 
very good idea, i like it.
i was thinking Gyllenhall for teh next spidey-man, but now i've changed my mind, Milo Ventimiglia 4 Spidey.
 
The guy is shooting a TV show 8 months a year. He doesn't have time to do Spidey 4.
 
i dont care, he's my dream choice!
 
Joseph Gordon-Levitt is the best choice.

Milo would make my top 5 though.
 
ya i like JGL too, i also like milo, jake, and scott M.
 
Let me be the first to rain on this parade and say this guy is a terrible actor. Thumbs down for me.
 
He is a bad actor is is "Scott M."

These are Freddie Prinze Jr. acting abilities and y'all want them...why?
 
Jake Gyllenhaal seems like the best choice to me.
 
Isn't it a little late for Ventimiglia to play Peter Parker?
 
Isn't it a little late for Ventimiglia to play Peter Parker?

Not if they recast.

But people are right. He isn't the best actor. But he's one of two actors at all that I've seen that have the right look to play an adult Peter Parker, the other one being Gyllenhaal, who still has to be considered to obvious choice for the role.

I mean, if they bring in a good director, and recast Peter and MJ with Gyllenhaal and MEW, then that's a cast I can be even more excited about than Tobey and Kirsten.
 
yes bring in someone fresh new and young. first things first he needs to builde some muscles
 
yes bring in someone fresh new and young. first things first he needs to builde some muscles

I don't think so. You can't make the characters younger. It'll mess with the pre-established character arcs. And plus, someone who looks like they're in high school, getting married (which I'm pretty sure would happen), would be too weird.

They need to show Peter moving into adulthood.
 
All these actors (other than Jake G) that fans have come up with are bad actors. Especially Scott M. Just because they're handosme doesn't mean they should play Peter Parker. Honeslty, if SM4 has a recast it's a shame Topher Grace is out of the running now.
 
All these actors (other than Jake G) that fans have come up with are bad actors. Especially Scott M. Just because they're handosme doesn't mean they should play Peter Parker. Honeslty, if SM4 has a recast it's a shame Topher Grace is out of the running now.

I had the same thought. I think that, if he hadn't already done Venom, Topher would be my #1 or #2 choice to replace Tobey Maguire.
 
Isn't that sort of what Peter is supposed to look like?

In pre-spider-bite high school days but not now. Peter Parker in college is supposed to look quite fit. Now, thats not to say ne neds to be jacked and ripped like the freakin' hulk though. Parker has a slender, well toned and defined body.
 
All these actors (other than Jake G) that fans have come up with are bad actors. Especially Scott M. Just because they're handosme doesn't mean they should play Peter Parker. Honeslty, if SM4 has a recast it's a shame Topher Grace is out of the running now.

I cried for the entre day the moment it was announced here that Grace was cast as Brock because that meant he couldn't replace Maguire.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"