• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

The Naked Fun in The Superhero Cinematic Civil War Thread - Part 61

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey I said it was ripping off Shawshank, too! :highfive:
giphy.webp
 
Man, I know Gunn wasnt responsible for any of these movies but it CAN'T be fun for him to be going in to the office each week after each one of these DC disasters one after the other after the other. It cant feel good knowing you're the head of a studio of a brand thats completely in the toilet as far as the general audience is concerned.

I personally think one of the biggest takeaways looking back on alot of these failures is that there just wasnt any quality control. DC/WBD had no one TO work with these filmmakers and ensure there was quality control, which was the problem. Dating all the way back to the Snyder days, there was no one around to look at the dailies coming in and be like "um, no, you're not doing that, thats not going to go over well." Or be like "ok, we need to rework this part of the movie." I know, i know, we all want filmmakers to be left alone to their own devices but when you're making huge films based on IP like this, it HAS to be a collaborative process and some of these creatives needed to be told "no," when in the process of making some of these things. But it needs to come from someone who knows what they're doing and not an ignorant studio suit who has no creative bone and just thinks about money.

And this is just the latest example, nobody looked at the Joker 2 dailies and said WTF is this and there's no way we're letting Todd do this.
True, in fact going back to Batman Returns and then B v S, WW84, Shazam 2, and now this it seems like anyone who has a hit film with DC then gets absolute complete control of the sequel and most of the time the directors just go bonkers with their "creative instincts".
 
just saw a post on X with a lot of likes saying Heath Ledger was the superior joker.

Nature is healing. :cool:
 

It’s kind of interesting to think about. Evans is a great leading man and can play a good, likable D-bag type. But I feel like he doesn’t really challenge himself in the way that Stan does. Stan plays a lot of scummy abusive husbands but even then, he varies his performances a lot. Evans is kinda stuck either playing the wholesome good guy or the scenery-chewing bad guy. The only thing I’ve seen him in where he played a more subdued and serious character recently was Defending Jacob. He needs to do more stuff like that, and more interesting projects like he did earlier in his career like Snowpiercer and Sunshine.
 
Evans is a talented actor, but I always got the impression that once he got big that he was more interested in enjoying himself than challenging himself for the art.

I think the last real role he had that wasn't Cap was Knives Out but even before that it was probably Snowpiercer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"