• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

The New Ghostbusters - Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hemsworth looks like he could be Egon's son. :up:

lol only if Egon got it on with the goddess Athena or something
tho I'm sure Harold Ramis would've greatly appreciated the comment
 
lol only if Egon got it on with the goddess Athena or something
tho I'm sure Harold Ramis would've greatly appreciated the comment

No I definitely see it.

egon.jpg
tumblrmoaqd2QDoF1rxmw80o1500.jpg
 
suuuuure
I wouldn't be surprised if they did that (wouldn't be their worst creative decision), but that might be a little hard to buy
 
Last edited:
All this needs in it is Amy Schumer playing a fat, drunken, ****ish Ghostbuster and the movie gods will know that they have seen perfection.
 
I was expecting him to be playing an inept musclehead who was only hired for his looks. :o

His role in GB2 will be him playing a hair stylist that is a nanny at night. Paul Feig should do role reversal and not write scripts anymore.
 
All this needs in it is Amy Schumer playing a fat, drunken, ****ish Ghostbuster and the movie gods will know that they have seen perfection.

seriously man?

comments like that are why people who dislike this movie for valid reasons get lumped into the misogynist a-hole category
 
seriously man?

comments like that are why people who dislike this movie for valid reasons get lumped into the misogynist a-hole category

Everyone has seen the movie? Please explain to me how people have seen it already. Explain those valid reasons.

Seriously...all of this movie looks like hot garbage. Hemsworth as a secretary is stupid. Let's make The Rock a phone operator! It's childish humor. It's low brow writing. McCarthy fumbling around is low brow. They remake a classic film and think it's brilliant to gender swap? No.

If the movie is good, I'll eat crow. But, I would bet it bombs and I'll gladly gloat.

Feig should have directed the Point Break remake but made it Thelma and Louise style. Maybe it wouldn't have bombed!?
 
Everyone has seen the movie? Please explain to me how people have seen it already. Explain those valid reasons.

Seriously...all of this movie looks like hot garbage. Hemsworth as a secretary is stupid. Let's make The Rock a phone operator! It's childish humor. It's low brow writing. McCarthy fumbling around is low brow. They remake a classic film and think it's brilliant to gender swap? No.

If the movie is good, I'll eat crow. But, I would bet it bombs and I'll gladly gloat.

Feig should have directed the Point Break remake but made it Thelma and Louise style. Maybe it wouldn't have bombed!?

I don't know if its because of the avatar but I read this post in Donald Trump's voice and his style of speaking and cadence actually fits the words nearly perfectly.
 
Everyone has seen the movie? Please explain to me how people have seen it already. Explain those valid reasons.

Seriously...all of this movie looks like hot garbage. Hemsworth as a secretary is stupid. Let's make The Rock a phone operator! It's childish humor. It's low brow writing. McCarthy fumbling around is low brow. They remake a classic film and think it's brilliant to gender swap? No.

If the movie is good, I'll eat crow. But, I would bet it bombs and I'll gladly gloat.

Feig should have directed the Point Break remake but made it Thelma and Louise style. Maybe it wouldn't have bombed!?

No, people haven't seen the movie, obviously, "valid concerns" I guess would be the better term, my bad
I even agree with a couple things you just said, about it being low-brow in a way the Originals definitely were not
But the point is, when you start calling actresses (even ones not in this movie) a fat drunken *****, you pretty much nullify your arguments as far as the other side is concerned, and ya make yourself look like a clown to boot
but I shoulda known by the Trump avy what your intentions were here
 
I'm not saying people have seen the movie, obviously, "valid concerns" I guess would be the better term
I even agree with a couple things you just said, about it being low-brow in a way the Originals definitely were not
But the point is, when you start calling actresses (even ones not in this movie) a fat drunken *****, you pretty much nullify your arguments as far as the other side is concerned, and ya make yourself look like a f***in' clown to boot
but I shoulda known by the Trump avy what your intentions were here
But that's Amy Schumer's shtick. She calls herself a fat, drunken ****e all the time. That's her entire comedic persona.
 
that's literally irrelevant to the point
if Samuel L called himself a "crazy n***a" we couldn't all start going into the Nick Fury thread and calling him "Marvel's resident n****r"

in a charged conversation, it was clearly a trollish statement, and it was my mistake to feed it

so whatev, convo over
 
It's a reboot ripoff. Actually there's no way to describe it, they're reusing the same logo, basically the same looking proton packs and Ecto-1. But the characters are gender swapped, because reasons.
 
It's a reboot ripoff. Actually there's no way to describe it, they're reusing the same logo, basically the same looking proton packs and Ecto-1. But the characters are gender swapped, because reasons.

Is that really your big problem with the movie? That they used... *gasp*... women instead of men as the main protagonists? Is that all it takes to lose your interest?
 
Is that really your big problem with the movie? That they used... *gasp*... women instead of men as the main protagonists? Is that all it takes to lose you?


No, at first it was, but that's the least of their worries now, the more they show and say about this, the more this looks like this is going to be this summer's Fant4stic and Pixels.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"