The Infernal
Mky Mk
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2005
- Messages
- 10,984
- Reaction score
- 1,133
- Points
- 103
Where did you read that?
The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technol...misogynistic-tweets-sent-by-women-study-finds
Where did you read that?
I thought you meant they said things that implied they hated women and were in favor of male superiority. This was a bit different then that.
I thought you meant they said things that implied they hated women and were in favor of male superiority. This was a bit different then that.
Yes, but this is not misogyny.I didn't say that. Just that women are (according to the study) around half of those sending aggressive tweets aimed at women.
Yes, but this is not misogyny.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misogynyThe article itself calls it mysoginy and I double checked the meaning in case I was confusing it with something else with a similar meaning. I didn't see a mention of male supremacy.
That isn't how that works.The vast majority of men don't hate women. If they did the entire species would die off.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misogyny
Misogyny is a hatred of women. A teenage girl talking trash about her teacher is not because she hates women, no matter how disgusting the language. A woman fat shaming another woman isn't because she hates women.
Who is using it and the reasoning behind the use of the phrases is kind of important. You know like the long conversation over a certain word used to disparage black people for the entire history of this country.
so the consensus is: "it's fine"
That's what Ive been getting so far
That isn't how that works.
Seems like. Although, interestingly, the backlash seems to be working in the movie's favor. I am reading these reviews and a lot of them almost feel as if the reviewer is looking for something to praise, almost desperately. As if they are conceding it is a bad movie, but don't want to call it one so they are finding hollow praise and calling it average. I think there might be something to be said for the theories that critics are afraid of being labeled misogynistic so they are giving it half-hearted average reviews.
The reviews are also curious because once the movie bombs (and with the way it is tracking, it probably will), I expect a lot of backlash from its makers and more adamant public supporters, basically calling audiences misogynistic.
Yeah the average score so far is 6.6 which is, at least where I went to school, a D. It's like: "You passed but it's nothing to be proud of" but that might change. Really surprised they have the consensus up already though. That seems really really early even with the number of reviews
There gender doesn't necessary exclude them, but if you read the article it shows what it classifies as abusive tweets. They do not read misogynistic.The writer of the article and those publishing the study have no problem as labeling those tweets as misogynistic. Why bother to ask for a source if all you're going to do is reply they're women therefore they can't be misogynistic?
While some may simply be using misogynistic language I don't see how their gender automatically excludes them hating other women. The language used is certainly misogynistic. I've seen some people echo the sentiment that some women don't like female comedians.
I recall a boss of mine years ago saying his Rhodesian landlord preferred letting out to white people because he didn't trust other black people. That still seems pretty racist to me even if it is towards his own kind.
I'm also reminded of this film about a self hating Jew. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Believer_(film)
I'm not saying that the tweets necessarily are from radical self haters, but that some of their actions and some of their views could be called mysoginist.
Edit: I'll make this my last post for tonight. Between not wanting to derail the movie thread any further and needing some sleep I think it's best to take a break here.
The vast majority is not all. And considering the amount of physical, mental and sexual abuse against women, that minority is a small amount. That is before we get into loved ones as those abusers.Hate to tell you but the vast majority of us want to love women.
TheComi[b said:Scott Pilgrim [/b]or Dredd that falls despite hitting the right buttons and spend years in development.
Yeah the average score so far is 6.6 which is, at least where I went to school, a D. It's like: "You passed but it's nothing to be proud of" but that might change. Really surprised they have the consensus up already though. That seems really really early even with the number of reviews
There is a variation of enthusiasm on all sides.Seems like. Although, interestingly, the backlash seems to be working in the movie's favor. I am reading these reviews and a lot of them almost feel as if the reviewer is looking for something to praise, almost desperately. As if they are conceding it is a bad movie, but don't want to call it one so they are finding hollow praise and calling it average. I think there might be something to be said for the theories that critics are afraid of being labeled misogynistic so they are giving it half-hearted average reviews.
The reviews are also curious because once the movie bombs (and with the way it is tracking, it probably will), I expect a lot of backlash from its makers and more adamant public supporters, basically calling audiences misogynistic.
On RT I feel like it is about average.I never said that 6.6 means the movie is terrible or that 6.6 is a terrible score.
I think 6.6 means it's passable. It's fine but nothing to write home about.
The vast majority is not all. And considering the amount of physical, mental and sexual abuse against women, that minority is a small amount. That is before we get into loved ones as those abusers.