Isn't he 23?Not sure Lerman counts as early 20s
Your right, in that pic he looks more 13. :/ He looks too young in that old pic.There is no way on this earth this guy looks 15-16. Just look at him for Pete's sakes!

I always thought of the hulk out as just meaning to become hulk. (E.g a large person) But I guess it was more likely talking about the Hulk.There's naturally a lot of Hulking out references. And then there was that one time when Kira was wearing Avengers leggings.

t:
)isn't he 23?
It'll probably be like this...How funny would it be if someone that no one has heard of gets cast... We're all just sitting here like :| ...
and the cycle continues I swear some fans never learn lolIt'll probably be like this...
![]()
No, Steve Weintraub claimed there is an actor in his early 20s though.did someone from marvel come out and say actors in their early 20s can make the cut?
and if wikipedia is correct, logan lerman is younger than o'brien, and even has the same birthday [blackout]as me[/blackout]
No, Steve Weintraub claimed there is an actor in his early 20s though.
that guy came out and said the actor that has been picked is in his early 20s?No, Steve Weintraub claimed there is an actor in his early 20s though.
hearing Drew Goddard is NOT part of Sony's panel today at CinemaCon.
that guy came out and said the actor that has been picked is in his early 20s?
Yes, my bad, some.He claimed there is some, not one.
No, he claimed that he heard they narrowed it own to 5 actors, and some of them are in their early 20s.that guy came out and said the actor that has been picked is in his early 20s?

yeah, I just went and looked at his twitter.No he said he heard of a shortlist that has some actors in their early 20s
yeah, I just went and looked at his twitter.
this is weird. if the redditleaker23456 was supposed to be right all along, then there's no more auditions going on, o'brien was picked and instructed to be hushed.
Steve just posted:
It's probably better that they reveal it in a later time anyways.
lol, the guy's got an answer for everything don'theRL said this is old info thats barely surfacing because of NDA's
I think you're looking too deep into this. Take my advice and prepare for any scenario.I think I'm the only person on here who's rooting against O'Brien. Not a hater at all, but I think that by the time that not only his first solo film is filmed, but the movies after that, he'll be way too old to be playing a 15-year-old kid. And dare I say I find his face pretty punchable? :/
The tweet did say a few in the five shortlisted are in their "very early 20s". If early 20s is between the ages of 20-23, then I suppose that would mean very early 20s is 20-21 or maybe 22.
Maybe I'm looking into this too deeply, maybe I'm going to get attacked by the '#dylan4spidey'-ers now, but at the end of the day, I think we'll be seeing someone in their late teens, that maybe a lot of us don't know, as our new Spider-Man.
And hell, there's nothing wrong with that. The new faces of the Star Wars saga are Daisy Ridley and John Boyega. Daisy Ridley was only in some unknown short films and an episode of Casualty before this, and now she's going to be the main character of the biggest movie franchise of all-time. Boyega was only in a few small-budget films and wasn't very known either, but he's going to be a household name this time next year. At the end of the day, I think we should stay patient and put our confidence in who these movie studios cast. Look at Ben Affleck as Batman. Opinion on Batfleck has turned 180 degrees since the casting was first announced.
To me, this shortlist info that is already being thrown around is of info that is months old. No way they haven't cast if Spiderman is in Civil War, as repeatedly mentioned.