The Amazing Spider-Man The Official ASM THEATRICAL TRAILER Thread! - Part 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's only in select theaters, though. They could if they wanted to.
 
Yeah, true.

And what about Sherlock Holmes 2?

EDIT: Nevermind, The Hobbit and TDKR trailer are attached to that apparently.
 
I'd say our best bet is with TinTin. It's going to be released in 3D and it's probably the right audience to showcase the trailer to.
 
I'd say our best bet is with TinTin. It's going to be released in 3D and it's probably the right audience to showcase the trailer to.

Ah s***. TinTin is already released here since October. Trailer will only be for North-America in theaters then I guess.
 
©KAW;22059533 said:
Oh no, people don't like when I bash Raimi's mediocre Spider-Man movies, get use to it, it ain't stopping any time soon. Oh, and thanks for responding to my post, AGAIN. There's your answer to you question, now if you can only figure out what to do to solve this problem, you'll be good. :dry:
You won't be around here much longer if that's the case. People (such as myself) are tired of you constantly bashing them in every topic.
 
Ah s***. TinTin is already released here since October. Trailer will only be for North-America in theaters then I guess.
Tintin is released where I live as well. Is there any other 3D movies coming out soon that it might be attached to?
 
I liked it. Brought up lots of memories from when I was younger.
I'll put it this way, it's a light hearted version of Indiana Jones.

I'm dying to see it.
That and Sherlock Holmes are the two movies I'm definitely going to see over christmas break.
 
The sony from now to December starts to invest heavily in marketing ASM, we've had the banners, trailer we now probably have some art in the subways of new york
 
©KAW;22059533 said:
I loved The Dark Knight it has every quality you'll never see in a Marvel Studio film. And guess what...I didn't direct it. :word:


to be fair marvel made IM and that is a near perfect superhero movie...I agree with you about the rest of their movies though.


you also call raimi's spidey movies mediocre as if a movie like SM2 comes round every year, it doesn't or rather if it has I must have missed it.
 
One thing I think superhero origin movies don't always do that well is juggle the origin of the superhero and the origin of the villain. This movie is about Spider-Man, not the Lizard and we should be approaching this story through Peter Parker's perspective. That doesn't mean that we can't let Connors have some scenes of his own, but they must only be there because they concern Spider-man's story. I don't want to feel like there are two parallel stories going on here that then meet at the end.

The Lizard's story has usually been portrayed this way anyways, Spidey fights the Lizard and then discovers his past and helps cure him. This will be Spider-Man's victory in this movie after losing Uncle Ben and this victory will convince him to continue being Spider-Man and helping people. Connors' story should be there to show exactly who Spider-man helped and maybe a scene at the end where Spidey sees Curt and his family reunited could pull that off.

They could just kill the Lizard off though. Then I would be just setting myself up for disappointment.

I don't care who the camera focuses on as long as that person/people are compelling. sure, I want to see lots of spidey but if the focus of the movie is conners and I am absolutely gripped with what I'm watching, who cares?

the problem whe the camera focuses on a character/s who aren't the hero and that character is boring or annoying *cough* blade 3 *cough*
 
Isn't the TDKR prologue going to be with MI4?
Only the 70mm IMAX prints, and the TDKR trailer is running with Sherlock Holmes 2. So the ASM trailer could very well could be attached to the regular MI4 prints, I suppose.
 
Says you and many other people who don't get the point of Harvey Dent's role in the film. The film was pretty much about harvey dent and the devil/angel on his shoulders (joker/batman). Two face as you know him in the comic was treated as a plot point, a tragic effect on harvey's life that lead to his death, therefore making joker's point that the best of us is truly corruptable. There was never any plan's to develop two face as an everlasting villain, his whole character was a point in which to illustrate the main themes of the film.


you can put a valid explanation forward and it probably is fair and logical but all I know is when I was watching TDK and 2-face was on the screen, I was like, 'where the hell did THAT come from?' (with regards to his personality shift) the change didn't feel 'earned'. as I said you can explain it away but that's what I felt as I was watching the movie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"