The visual style of Nolan's two Batman films, are replicas of Batman Year One, and The Dark Knight looks like the contemporary Gotham City found in The Killing Joker, etc.
You know what I mean, LOL ...
It wasn't prominently featured. But when it did the look of the city is very contemporary and realistic. Not full of Gothic structures, Neone lights, etc.
No there isn't. There is some, but not to great extents. And there are Gothic architexture, but it doesn't equate to the ultra stylized version of Burton's Gotham City. That's the point I was making, and I don't understand what you're wanting to argue? The look of Gotham in BEGINS and TDK is similar to the Gotham in B:YO and The Killing Joke. Chicago has alot of Gothic architexture, but it isn't full of gargoyles. I'm saying a contemporary city can represent Gotham. Gotham isn't just represented by stylistic city scapes, with an abundance of Gothic architexture and gargoyles. I'm arguing that Nolan's Gotham certainly looks like different versions of Gotham seen in the comics. The poster I was arguing with said Nolan's Batman look was "off" and wasn't an accurate representation of what Gotham would or ever has looked like in the comics. Which is completely false.
Then why were you replying to me? And specifically refrencing what I was talking about?
Why? There was no point in mentioning any of this ... all I was explaining was that Nolan's visual interp of Batman's city is equivelent to quite a few ways its seen in Batman stories.
