JLBats
The boney king of nowhere
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2004
- Messages
- 21,949
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
BatmanRules33 said:
We all do. Did you get Daisy's warning about your trolling?
BatmanRules33 said:
BatmanRules33 said:im not trolling. there fore nobody gave me a warning, cept nukk nukk sending me stupid pm's![]()
JLBats said:Look in the Bale vs. Keaton thread. You got warned.
BatmanRules33 said:good for you, now if your not gonna praise BR, then dont spam here it gets annoying and from all your previous posts i think we ALL know your opinion on things.![]()
snwboarder88 said:yes...its really annoying..no need to bring the argument into every thread. thats spamming.
Keyser Sushi said:It's not an argument, and it's not spam. It's an attempt at intelligent discussion. Why do you people insist on only talking to people who agree with you? I personally enjoy discussing differing viewpoints, and I have yet to have an in-depth discussion with anybody here at the Hype! regarding Batman Returns. I was hoping I would find it in this thread but I guess not.
By the way, if you feel that I am spamming, then why don't you report me to the mods?
Keyser Sushi said:Oh, okay. My mistake. I thought snwboarder88 was supporting BatmanRules33's suggestion that I stop "spamming" this thread. Apologies.
Keyser Sushi said:Right on. There's a lot of cool stuff about the movie - as with any Burton movie, the production design is gorgeous. The costumes were great (Pfieffer's Catwoman, as I say, is "teh secks") and Keaton's Batman suit is much improved. I prefer to natural muscle look of the suit in BATMAN '89 but the armor-plated look is more honest, in a sense - since that's what the suit is meant to be in those movies: armor. I think the cowl in Returns is much better than the cowl in '89.
Even the Penguin - while I don't like what they did the character, he does look cool. I'm also glad they kept the same Batmobile design from '89. I like continuity!
But on that subject, what I think is weird is how Wayne Manor looks totally different in Returns than it did in '89. I heard that the reason was that Burton didn't view "Returns" as a sequel to BATMAN, but as a new Batman movie that was entirely unrelated to BATMAN '89.
Which is an interesting concept. But if that's what he was doing... why did Bruce mention Vicki Vale when he was talking to Alfred?!?!
"Who's the one who let Vicki Vale into the Batcave? I'm working, all of a sudden I look up, 'oh, hey Vick, uh, come on in..."
snwboarder88 said:I agree thats one thing I never really understood...because BR wasnt suppose to be a "sequel" as in continuity, it was just suppose to be like another episode of Batmans adventures. So I didnt get it when Bruces tells Selina that there was a girl...Vicki? Oh well, I actually liked the fact they mentioned her, I dont like it when characters that were in a previous movie and not in the sequel get know mention of at all, they just went on "vacation!"
Keyser Sushi said:"Batman Intimidation" was one of the working titles for Batman Begins. And notice the tagline "Let the legend begin" underneath it? This looks like a fan-made teaser poster for BB before the official title was announced.
Look at the word "Intimidation" and "Let the legend begin" and notice that the letters are much sharper and clearer there than the rest... meaning this probably began its life as a photo of a BR teaster poster scanned into the computer, and the other words were dropped in using a graphics editing program.