The Official Green Lantern Review Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not disagreeing with you there. But, just based on the Wonder Con trailer and the 3D trailer, I just don't see this flick as a stinker. It just doesn't feel like it. It doesn't look cheap like Thor ( a film I like a lot...seen it three times).

It feels big.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Probably to reduce cost. Not sure what the total budget for the film was, but I'm sure this was a big consideration.

You're right there was going to be alot of CGI, especially going with the CG costume. I'd venture to say there will probably be twice the amount of CG shots as there were in Thor, because of all the set filming and such, and Thor had alot of CG in Asguard.

In any case, while you don't want them to penny pinch, it is all about the bottom line, the film has to be profitable.

I think they did their cost reductions by outsourcing their visual effects to India. I still don't think that the producers felt that the work of ILM or Weta Workshop was any more or less superior to that of SPI.
 
Not necessarily a review, but a refresher course for the unknowing about "Green Lantern":

'Green Lantern' 101: What you need to know about Hollywood's latest hero

HOLLYWOOD -- The Green Lantern isn't exactly an obscure superhero, as anyone who has seen Sheldon Cooper talk about his favorite comic-book character the CBS sitcom "The Big Bang Theory" can tell you. But as popular as he his among fanboys, D.C. Comics' sci-fi crime-fighter doesn't quite boast the same iconic status as Superman or Batman, either.

The first youn need to know about 'Green Lantern' is this: ring plus lantern equals awesome superpowers.
He's what Donald De Line -- producer of Warner Bros.' New Orleans-shot mega-budget film based on the character -- called a "second-tier" comic book character last week during a press day at the Beverly Hilton.
(The reaction of actor Ryan Reynolds, who plays the Green Lantern and alter-ego Hal Jordan in the film: "Yeah, that hurts. That hurts.")
So with Warner Bros.' eagerly awaited big-screen adaptation set to hit screens on Friday -- the biggest film, in terms of money spent in-state, ever shot in Louisiana, according to state film officials -- here's a quick primer on the emerald avenger, for those who might need a bit of remediation before heading to the theater on Friday.

The Green Lantern boasts some of the most powerful bling in comic-book history.
The ring: Batman has his utility belt. Superman has his cape. The Green Lantern has an alien green ring from which all of his powers derive -- but only when it is coupled with ...
The lantern: Yes, it is green, and it serves as a sort of battery that must be used to recharge the ring every so often.
The oath: The movie trailer has a little fun with it, but it's the noble, Burma-Shave-style rhyme that the Green Lantern traditionally utters when charging his ring: "In brightest day, in blackest night, / No evil shall escape my sight / Let those who worship evil's might, / Beware my power ... Green Lantern's light!" (If you didn't click on the "Big Bang Theory" clip I linked to above, now would be the perfect time.)
The man: Before becoming the Green Lantern, Hal Jordan is a hotshot, daredevil test pilot. Sort of an anti-Clark Kent, he's the kind of super-suave guy who is quick with a one-liner and popular with the ladies. In other words, he's perfect superhero material. In the long-running comic-book series, the ring that gives him his power has been passed on to several other humans who have fulfilled the Green Lantern's duties over the years. The movie, however, focuses on Jordan.

the Green Lantern Corps assembles, in an image from Warner Bros.' New Orleans-shot superhero film 'Green Lantern.'
The backstory: The intergalactic peacekeeping force known as the Green Lantern Corps -- made up of 3,600 Green Lanterns from various other planets -- is struggling to keep peace in the universe, as a powerful, malevolent force known as Parallax has been reawakened and is once again wreaking havoc. That's when Jordan is chosen to become a new, human member of the Corps -- by the ring itself, when its previous holder is mortally wounded. Naturally, Jordan is not sure what to make of all this at first.
The superpowers: Among other things, the ring gives its holder the ability to conjure up anything his imagination desires -- and maintain it as long as his will and strength hold out. That means weapons, force fields, invisibility cloaks and other snatches of emerald awesomeness. Jordan's ability to conquer his fears makes him a particularly strong ring-bearer.

The monstrous Parallax strikes, in a scene from Warner Bros. New Orleans-shot superhero film 'Green Lantern.'
The bad guys: Every good superhero needs a good supervillain or two. For Hal Jordan and his fellow Green Lanterns, it's Parallax, a monolithic alien force that draws its strength from the fear of others; and his Earth-bound surrogate, Dr. Hector Hammond. Played by Peter Sarsgaard in the film, Hammond is a longtime acquaintance of Jordan's but has always been jealous of Jordan's talent -- and his relationship with ...
The girl: Carol Ferris (played by Blake Lively) is a childhood friend of Jordan's, and his longtime romantic interest. She's also an executive with Ferris Aircraft, where Jordan works. In the comic books -- though not in this movie -- she goes on to become the supervillain known as Star Sapphire.

Blake Lively, in a scene from Warner Bros.' New Orleans-shot superhero film 'Green Lantern.'
The supporting characters: Sinestro is the magenta-skinned head of the Green Lantern Corps. Played by Mark Strong in the film, he's not at all convinced that a mere human is worthy of becoming a Green Lantern -- and, in a scene hidden in the film's closing credits -- appears to be ready to fight for that belief in a planned sequel. ... Kilowog (voiced by Michael Clarke Duncan) is a monolithic alien Green Lantern who heads up training for new members of the Green Lantern Corps. ... Another alien Lantern, Tomar-Re (voiced by Geoffrey Rush), helps with the training. ... Abin Sur is the dying alien who gives Jordan his Green Lantern ring ... Dr. Amanda Blake (played by Angela Bassett), is a former government agent and congressional aide -- and a formidable D.C. Comics antihero.
The miscellany: Oa is the fictional planet on which the Green Lantern Corps is based. ... The color yellow, which is "the color of fear," is one of the Green Lantern's few weaknesses. ... The fictional California town of Coast City is the setting for "Green Lantern" ... The Justice League of America is the D.C. Comics superhero alliance that includes Green Lantern, as well as Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Aquaman, the Flash and others -- all of whom may team up for a "Justice League" film as early as 2013.
 
First user review on Imdb: ( I know, not much value in it)

I think we have a new superhero franchise:
All I can say is that I was extremely impressed with this film. Based on the trailers, I was expecting this film to be mediocre, I was wrong. In my opinion, for a superhero film to work, it all narrows down to special effects and the acting. For this movie, both are great. This movie may not have been as good as X-men: First Class or The Dark Knight, but it is an above average superhero movie. Ryan Reynolds is good as always and Mark Strong delivered a strong performance as well. This movie is heavy on special effects and they are SPECTACULAR. The dialogue is nothing new but don't expect it to be excellent given the fact that its a superhero movie. Overall, this movie was very well done and I liked it a whole lot more than I thought it would. Hopefully this may be the first of many Green Lantern movies because this has the potential to become a great movie franchise.
8/10

http://www.imdb.com/user/ur26509556/comments

And this one ( contains spoiler!!, but go see the movie!!)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBEVe4Bo_CM
 
Last edited:
Not disagreeing with you there. But, just based on the Wonder Con trailer and the 3D trailer, I just don't see this flick as a stinker. It just doesn't feel like it. It doesn't look cheap like Thor ( a film I like a lot...seen it three times).

It feels big.

And yet 3 days out, no reviews.
 
Wait for reviews is killing.

Maybe, I will write one myself after I see the movie on 17 th.
 
First user review on Imdb: ( I know, not much value in it)

8/10

http://www.imdb.com/user/ur26509556/comments

And this one ( contains spoiler!!, but go see the movie!!)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBEVe4Bo_CM

"Don't expect it to be excellent given the fact that it's a superhero movie"

What the hell is that supposed to mean? Superhero movies can't have good dialogue?

And spectacular special effects should be the bread and butter. I expect more than that from a movie.

We'll see though. IMDB is the same as **************.com as far as i'm concerned.
 
It could be a number of things.
Last minute tweaking or maybe its not that the studio doesnt have confidence,but they are just not sure what they have.
Its very CGI heavy and maybe they are just a little nervous about it .
 
Today was the premiere of GL in Manila:

Was blessed to watch the premiere of Green Lantern. What an awesome movie.. loved it!!!

http://***********/#!/randelltiongson/status/80292363657949184
 
considering there are big movies that don't get reviewed until they come out (I believe scott pilgrim was one) I'm not worried. They're having screenings and I've disagreed with critics numerous times so I just want to see the movie.
 
I think it's pretty clear at this point that WB is blocking the reviews. I can't see why they would do that if the reviews were good. I don't want to be all doom and gloom, but usually when stuff like this happens it's not good.
 
Well, according to at least one blogger/critic Drew McWeeny, his embargo lifts on Wednesday. So, yes, WB is "blocking" reviews from being published.

The studio has a lot riding on this movie, so I'm not surprised.
 
I believe Green Lantern is going to be a success with audience, but not with critics.

Its the kind of movie critics dont dig it.
 
Well, according to at least one blogger/critic Drew McWeeny, his embargo lifts on Wednesday. So, yes, WB is "blocking" reviews from being published.

The studio has a lot riding on this movie, so I'm not surprised.

It's a matter of WB enforcing the embargo. Usually if the studios trust in the film, they don't enforce the embargo. In fairness, they're not the only one's doing it. Fox is blocking Mr. Popper's Penguins reviews.
 
It's a matter of WB enforcing the embargo. Usually if the studios trust in the film, they don't enforce the embargo. In fairness, they're not the only one's doing it. Fox is blocking Mr. Popper's Penguins reviews.

yeesh, that movie looks TERRIBLE.
 
It's a matter of WB enforcing the embargo. Usually if the studios trust in the film, they don't enforce the embargo. In fairness, they're not the only one's doing it. Fox is blocking Mr. Popper's Penguins reviews.

Well Xmen and Super 8 were only blocked until the
Monday of their release. Blocking it till Weds is not a good sign
 
And it was the same thing with Thor and Paramount ! I think its's just ... normal !
 
No its not. Read my post. Usually studios allow reviews to get published on the Monday of if not a bit earlier if the movie has a good buzz. Like Super 8 and X-Men.

You cannot create buzz when the reviews come out Weds or Thurs. Not saying GL will be bad but this is a weary sign.
 
No its not. Read my post. Usually studios allow reviews to get published on the Monday of if not a bit earlier if the movie has a good buzz. Like Super 8 and X-Men.

You cannot create buzz when the reviews come out Weds or Thurs. Not saying GL will be bad but this is a weary sign.

Yes, but you can kill buzz if they lift the embargo and the reviews are terrible. I'm hopeful for the film, but your right this is a bad sign.

This is a buisness venture, and WB is acting like they're trying to cut their losses.

Again, speculation on my part. Believe me, I hope I'm 100% wrong, but this is not encouraging.
 
Also bloggers and critics were openly liking about movies like Suoer 8, Thor and X-Men during the embargo on twitter. They just mention how they liked it, etc. Not a peep about Green Lantern thus far....
 
Last edited:
Honestly, I just don't see this film stinking because of the director involved. Whether it's a transcendent comic book film or a masterpiece is kind of irrelevant.

This guy is a competent director. This guy can direct high adventure films. The Mask of Zorro. Goldeneye. Casino Royale. The guy has a track record of good work...

It may not be the greatest film of the world. I don't think they phoned this in. I think they tried making the best film they could, considering the character/universe they're working in.

But this I know; it's going to be a solid film, based solely on Martin Campbell. That I do know.

I think Campbell is a good director...but the problem may be the way WB put this movie together, a kind of committee thinking where they hire a good director like Campbell, who can deliver what they want, but doesn't really have a singular vision for the franchise or a vested interest in GL. Then they hire all the top artists and crew etc. So the movie has all great elements but don't really result in something greater than the sum of its parts.

I'm not really worried about lack of reviews or critics. I think WB feel they have a commercial hit and don't want critics to distract from that, so they have pushed the marketing a lot lately to get to their target audience.

My only worry is that it might backfire, that because it is heavily aimed at young people, that merchandising and product placement is so tied in to it all, that it just creates indifference and just does "average" in box office.

I did want to see something maybe more serious, even like X-Men First Class, but it's likely going to be an unapologetic mainstream movie. Maybe that's okay too. But I just hope it gets to keep on going. Harry Potter's first movie was very mainstream and that was allowed to grow and evolve.
 
That is possible Willi Berg. I imagine the likes of Geoff Johns and Dan Didio had a big say in the creation of this movie.
 
I think Campbell is a good director...but the problem may be the way WB put this movie together, a kind of committee thinking where they hire a good director like Campbell, who can deliver what they want, but doesn't really have a singular vision for the franchise or a vested interest in GL. Then they hire all the top artists and crew etc. So the movie has all great elements but don't really result in something greater than the sum of its parts.

I'm not really worried about lack of reviews or critics. I think WB feel they have a commercial hit and don't want critics to distract from that, so they have pushed the marketing a lot lately to get to their target audience.

My only worry is that it might backfire, that because it is heavily aimed at young people, that merchandising and product placement is so tied in to it all, that it just creates indifference and just does ''average'' in box office.

I did want to see something maybe more serious, even like X-Men First Class, but it's likely going to be an unapologetic mainstream movie. Maybe that's okay too. But I just hope it gets to keep on going. Harry Potter's first movie was very mainstream and that was allowed to grow and evolve.

I'm starting to wonder if maybe WB has over promoted this film. The advertising for this film has bordered on desperate at times, it's like they're forcing the hype, that is where it might backfire.
 
I'm starting to wonder if maybe WB has over promoted this film. The advertising for this film has bordered on desperate at times, it's like they're forcing the hype, that is where it might backfire.


The marketing honestly feels at the same level as TDK to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,272
Messages
22,077,982
Members
45,878
Latest member
Remembrance1988
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"