Marvel can eat ****. As much as I was looking forward to The Avengers, I'm not going to reward their ****ty decision-making by paying money to go see it.
This really pisses me off. I loved TIH.

Because neither would consider recasting roles when things don't work out, right?My money is probably better spent on the Spidey reboot and Batman 3.
They did not say "more talented". They said "more collaborative".I don't even know why we bother anymore. It's so frustrating to the fans the follow these movies religiously. Every news, every development, every rumor or scoop... BS or not. Then they slap us in the faces like this. Then to top it off with, "we need a more talented actor... it wasn't about money." How ****ing stupid do you think we are? We gave them every opportunity, I guarantee to anyone that this will be another forgettable, mediocre, popcorn blockbuster.
Thank God comic book fans don't have the nuclear codes.
Seriously, we don't know half the story, from what Norton said about telling Marvel we wanted him in the movie, he was basically saying 'tell Marvel I'm worth the $100million I'm demanding', blaming it all on Kevin Feige is just wrong when it's based on...well nothing.
Either way, I'll still be in the theater the day this movie comes out. And I'm sure you will too.

Really people?!
You just gonna give up on the Avengers just because one actor won't return for a certain role?
So sad!![]()
I will still see the Avengers, regardless of who is the next Banner. As long as he is a great actor.
Welcome to SHH. When disappointing news comes along, suddenly everyone is evil and the entire movie is going to be horrible.Really people?!
You just gonna give up on the Avengers just because one actor won't return for a certain role?
So sad!![]()
Yeah sure i'll be there opening weekend, but like I said, my ticket stub will read something other than Avengers.
Because neither would consider recasting roles when things don't work out, right?
They did not say "more talented". They said "more collaborative".
PresumptuousFlushing a talent like Norton for no reason really cools the fire and will either make fans luke-warm or flat out angry. Not the best of ideas in either case.
Because neither would consider recasting roles when things don't work out, right?
(which isn't nessecarily a bad thing, I like Hugh's Wolverine)