Spider-Vader
Mercin' & Workin'
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2007
- Messages
- 12,396
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 58
Even if Hulk is the "villain" in this I want to see him do something heroic, like save a civilian or something like that.
Even if Hulk is the "villain" in this I want to see him do something heroic, like save a civilian or something like that.
I got a strong feeling that the hulk will either be in the Avengers movie or he will not be in the Avengers movie.

Ah ha! So THIS is where all the Hulk fans are hiding out now.

That certainly is promising news.
Can't rightfully have Abomination without Hulk, can you?
Or rather, you shouldn't.
I'm not sure how Roth would return even if they did bring back Abomination. I mean, he cant transform back and forth like Hulk, can he? So he's just permanently a giant monster. What's really for Tim Roth to do, other than maybe lend his voice for a few lines.
He can do the motion capture for Abomination or if Marvel decide to use the technology James Cameron helped create for his film Avatar then Roth could be used for the facial and performance capture of Abomination as well as doing the voice.
I would think that his role would be expanded a bit. I mean, anyone can do motion capture for Abom, and even the facial expressions. I highly doubt they would pay Tim Roth just for this. So I'm thinking he will show his face as the human Emil Blonsky.
In the comics, he can´t. That doesn´t necessarily mean, the movie version can´t.Can Blonsky even transform back into a human??
In the comics, he can´t. That doesn´t necessarily mean, the movie version can´t.
Well if you read up on James Cameron's performance capture technology then you will see that it does matter who does the movements and facial expressions.
Zoe Zaldana plays a lead role in the film which is completely CGI and Sam Worthington plays a lead role which is also CGI for a large chunk of the film.
Using this new tech allows a literal performance to be captured so Roth would be needed.